Book Review & Application
Book Review & Application
Instructions
This project is worth 100 points, or 10% of your final grade. It is due Saturday, March 13th at 11:59PM via Blackboard (see the “Assignments” section). Like all written assignments, follow both the “Written Assignments Policy” and the “Reference Citation Policy”. This report should be 4-5 pages, double-spaced, not including the reference page. Use subheadings for each of the categories.
It is very important to cite your sources. If you use content from another source without citing it, that is considered plagiarism (even if it was not your intent). I check for plagiarism via “Safe Assign” in blackboard. Any plagiarized work will automatically receive a “0”. To help you properly cite your work, below you will find some examples and tips. I use APA formatting and this is formatting that I want you to use as well. The examples below are in proper APA formatting.
There are two types of citation: direct and indirect. Direct citation refers to when you are quoting something or someone directly. For example, if you were to directly quote the book in your reflection paper, this direct quote would need to have quotations around it and include the page numbers. Below are examples of two ways you might directly quote something.
“Another strength, more conceptual in nature, results from the way the trait approach highlights the leader component in the leadership process” (Northouse, 2018, p. 30).
As Northouse (2018, p. 30) states, “Another strength, more conceptual in nature, results from the way the trait approach highlights the leader component in the leadership process”.
In comparison, indirect citation (which is preferable in most cases – only quote something if there truly isn’t another way to phrase something), involves you paraphrasing the author. In this case, no quotes are needed but you still need to cite the author. Below is an example of the above quote paraphrased.
The trait approach has many strengths as a theory of leadership, including the fact that it is more conceptual in nature as a consequence of it highlighting the leader component in the process of leadership (Northouse, 2018).
In both cases, you would need to provide the full citation in the reference page at the end of the paper. All elements of your written project will need to incorporate sources (except possibly the leader interview) and should have both citations and a reference page.
My quick tip for creating references: go to scholar.google.com and search the title of the article or book. If you click the ” button, a full citation will already appear for you to copy and paste into your reference page (although you will need to adjust the font and make sure the references are “hanging”). See the picture below.
REFERENCES
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win – Jocko Willink & Leif Babin (book selected)
Content Areas
· Book Synopsis & Selection Choice
· Approximately 1 page
· Discuss why you chose this book and what you hoped to learn by reading it
· Provide a brief synopsis of the book (in your own words) – what is the book about? What key lessons or takeaways does it provide?
· What I Learned
· Approximately 1 page
· Discuss what you learned from the book, perhaps include a meaningful quote or lesson
· Course Overlap & Divergence
· Approximately 1 page
· In your opinion, how does what you learned from this book line up with what you have learned in the course? Discuss similarities and differences. In this section, you will need to cite the textbook as well as the book you chose
· Personal Application
· Approximately 1 page
· How will you apply the lessons learned from the book to your personal life, college career, and/or professional life?
Rubric
|
Content Area |
Above Average |
Average |
Below Average |
|
Book Synopsis & Selection Choice |
18 – 20 Points
Book choice was discussed thoughtfully and the synopsis was written in own words. |
13 – 17 Points
Both topics were discussed well, but both could have been more authentic or thoughtful. |
< 13 Points
Surface-level or boiler-plate discussion of book synopsis or selection choice (i.e., “This book is about leaning in/I also wanted to lean in”). |
|
What I Learned |
18 – 20 Points
Through and detailed discussion of one or two key lessons from the book, including citation. |
13 – 17 Points
Good discussion, with citation, but could have been more detailed or specific. |
< 13 Points
Surface-level or boiler-plate lessons (i.e., “I learned the importance of leaning in”). |
|
Course Overlap & Divergence |
18 – 20 Points
Thoughtful discussion, with strong citations, on the similarities and differences. |
13 – 17 Points
Good discussion, but this discussion could have been richer or more thorough. |
< 13 Points
Surface-level or boiler-plate differences (i.e. “both talked about gender in some way”). |
|
Personal Application |
18 – 20 Points
Meaningful, authentic, and thoughtful personal applications were made. |
13 – 17 Points
Good applications were made, but these applications could have been deeper. |
< 13 Points
Surface-level or boiler-plate applications (i.e., “I will lean in in life”). |
|
Writing Quality, Referencing, & Formatting |
18 – 20 Points
The paper is very well-written, with no typos, grammar problems, and all formatting and referencing is done correctly. |
13 – 17 Points
The paper is well-written, but there were a few errors. Formatting and referencing were also done well, but maybe not perfectly. |
< 13 Points
There were several noticeable problems with the writing and/or there were serious problems with the formatting and referencing. |