I need it within 24 hours from now ,only computer Science expert need

Prepared by: Mr. Naveed Dilber Moderated by: Dr. SM Farhad, December 2018

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Unit Code BN321

Unit Title Advanced Network Design

Assessment Type Individual written report – T3 2018 (Assignment 2)

Assessment Title Network requirement analysis and design

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)

After successful completion of this assignment, students should be able to:  Apply concepts and theories of human factors as related to network design

and implementation  Compare performance metrics and dimensions according to specifications

Weight 15% of the total assessments

Total Marks 50

Word limit 1200 - 1500

Due Date 30th January, 2019 (23:55)

Submission Guidelines

 All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.

 The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.

 Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.

Extension  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, on academic reception level. You must submit this application within three working days of the assessment due date. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures- and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment

Academic Misconduct

 Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 2 of 3

Prepared by: Mr. Naveed Dilber Moderated by: Dr. SM Farhad, December 2018

Assignment Description

Objectives:

You are a Network Engineer with a computer systems integration company named ‘Skillforce IT’. You have

been tasked with designing a new network implementation for a new medium size client “ABC IT Institute” in

Melbourne. You will use your newly gained knowledge to design and manage the network infrastructure in

order to facilitate a successful outcome for Skillforce IT and the client which can accommodate their network

load now and for another five years.

Task 1:

It's difficult to build a solution if you don't know the requirements. Your task is to gather requirements (User,

Application, Device and Network) to complete this project with the help of techniques such as Questionnaire,

interview from Users or staff. Students must discuss questionnaire/interview with tutor before finalizing all

requirements.

Furthermore, with the help of diagram’s and flow charts, categorize and discuss all requirements in groups

and create an Assessment plan for the network.

Task 2:

Your task is to come up with a logical, efficient and scalable network design that is suitable for ABC IT Institute.

Analyze all requirements gathered in Task 1 and proposed suggestions accordingly. Create network

performance metrics including (Bandwidth, Delay, Jitter, Packet loss, Utilization, uptime or responsiveness etc)

and justify your proposed solution.

Your report should also include suggestions for a network analyzer for network diagnostics, monitoring and

troubleshooting. Make sure you provide enough information that will allow IT technicians to build network

infrastructure from scratch. The Company has allowed an adequate budget to purchase any networking device

such as routers, switches, IP phones, access points, network cables etc yet obviously does not want to spend

more than necessary.

Marking criteria:

Sections to be included in

the report

Description of the section Marks

Task 1

Requirements Gathering

Requirements Gathering from for Users, Devices, Application

and Network.

15

Technique used for collecting

requirements in Task 1

Clarity of Technique used in a way to collect maximum

requirements.

5

Task 2

Network Design

Include a diagram of your designed network, and write

justifications of your design

15

Performance Metrics Network performance metrics defined and justified 10

Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5

Total 50

BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 3 of 3

Prepared by: Mr. Naveed Dilber Moderated by: Dr. SM Farhad, December 2018

Marking Rubric

Grade Mark

HD 40-50

DI 35-39

CR 30-34

P 25-29

Fail <25

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Task 1 Requirements Gathering /15

Requirements gathered are concise and specific to the project

Requirements gathered are moderately concise and specific to the project

Requirements gathered are somehow relevant to the project.

Some relevance but not well presented.

This is not relevant to the assignment topic.

Technique used for collecting requirements in Task 1 /5

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and relevant to Assessment requirements

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but few material used is not relevant

Demonstrated good ability to think critically and relevant to Assessment requirements

Demonstrated satisfactory ability to think critically and relevant to Assessment requirements

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and not relevant to Assessment requirements

Task 2 Network Design /15

Network Design logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

Network Design logic is clear but not clearly presented with arguments

Network Design logic is moderately clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

Network Design logic is not clear however some arguments are satisfactory

Network Design logic is not clear and not presented appropriately

Performance Metrics /10

Performance metrics is concise and well related to assessment requirements

Performance metrics is moderately concise and well related to assessment requirements

Performance metrics is concise however arguments are not related to assessment requirements

Performance metrics is not concise but some arguments are related to assessment requirements

Performance metrics is not concise and not related to assessment requirements

Reference style /5

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

Clear referencing style

Generally good referencing style

Sometimes clear referencing style

Lacks consistency with many errors