SRS document on library database

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Unit Code BN209

Unit Title Trimester 1, 2018 – Software Engineering

Assessment Type Assignment 1

Assessment Title Group Assignment

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)

This assignment assesses the below Unit Learning Outcomes; students should be able to demonstrate their achievements in them:

- Define System requirement through requirement elicitation and workshops

- Explain the process for, and execute, verification and validation of system requirements

- Apply use case, data and process modelling techniques to specify system requirements

Weight 15%

Total Marks 75

Breakups of assessment are as follows:

• SRS Document - 50 marks, 10% of the total 15%

• MS Access Database - 25 marks, 5% of the total 15%

Word limit 6-8 A4 Pages

Due Date Friday Week 7: 4th May 2018 23:55

Submission Guidelines

• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.

• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.

• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.

Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:

http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment

Academic Misconduct

Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy- Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

Purpose of the assessment:

The purpose of this assignment is to produce and submit a consolidated FIRST VERSION of the Software

Requirement Specification Document and MS Access Prototype for your chosen project. Projects Selection:

Student can choose/select any website/application/system/software with enabled database component as a

reference for their project from the following domains (industries) to investigate, analyse, and prototype:

o Education

o Shopping

o Library

o Airline

o Financial

o Entertainment

Task

Once student select their project, they need to do in-depth analysis for the project to complete Software

Requirement Specification document and then develop MS Access prototype that relate to their selected

project. Students need approval from lecture / tutor for their selected project.

Students have to submit:

1. The SRS Document (Templates are available on MOODLE):

a) Project introduction b) Project Goals, objectives, stakeholders etc. c) Functional and non-functional requirements d) Technical assumptions and constraints e) An appropriate diagrams e.g. storyboards, mock-ups etc.

Students should also pursue the following steps to complete SRS Document:

a) Required diagrams e.g. Use Case Diagrams, Context Diagram, ERD, DFD-L0 etc. (First Version) b) Proper References. c) Well written, properly formatted, correct grammar, no spelling mistakes etc. document.

d) Length of the document between six to eight A4 pages.

2. The Access prototype should include (Reference, week 01 LAB DB File and available on MOODLE):

a) The prototype will have a splash page at the start.

b) All the tables and attributes properly documented and structured.

c) Enough functionality to see the prototype working.

d) The corresponding reading and writing forms for the tables.

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

3. An up to date copy of the Project Activity Journal where you show the weekly working of the

group.

Team submission:

This is a group assignment hence, only one member from a group will upload the ONE ZIP FILE on

MOODLE.

References and appendices

• Reference sources must be cited in the appropriate section of the document.

• All cited references in IEEE style

• List all the appendices Submission guidelines:

The report should have a consistent, professional, and well-organized appearance.

1. Your report should include the following:

• The cover page must identify students’ (name and number), teaching staff, and assignment.

• The assignment must use 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font with appropriate section headings.

2. The assignment must be submitted in soft (electronic) copy under Moodle. The pages of the assignment must be clear on each page.

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

Marking criteria: Marks are allocated as follows: Assignment #1 SRS Document = 50 Marks (10% of the 15% total)

SRS Description of the section Marks

Introduction Outline of the project 5

General description Description of the project 5

Specific requirements Functional and non-functional specifications, etc., as indicated in the template 10

Analysis models Diagrams, figures, etc., as in the template 15

Goals, objective,

assumptions, constraints

Project goals, objectives, assumptions, and constraints 5

Appendices, references IEEE style 5

Presentation Appearance, grammar, clarity etc. 5

Total 50

Assessment #1 MS Access Prototype = 25 Marks (5% of the 15% total)

During Lab Classes (Week 02- Week 06)

Access DB Description of the section Marks

Splash page DB opening form 5

Data structure DB data and metadata for the project, keys, etc. 5

Functionality Functions implemented 5

Forms All the forms in the project implemented 5

General navigation and

appearance

Appearance, clarity 5

Total 25

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

Marking Rubric for SRS document: Total Marks 50

Grade/Mark HD 80% -100% D 70%-79% C 60%-69% P 50%-59% Fail <50

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Introduction

Project properly

summarized and set

in context

Generally easy to follow, with some deficiencies.

Summary not easy to

follow, context

unclear

Some relevance

and briefly

presented.

This is not

relevant to

the

assignment

topic.

General

Description

All topics are

pertinent and

covered in depth.

Most topics are

pertinent and

covered in depth

Correct, with some

deficiencies

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Specific

requirements

Requirements are

all

covered and

properly

specified

Most

requirements

are covered and

properly

specified

Some

requirements are

missing or not

properly specified

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Analysis

models

All elements and

diagrams are present

and well designed

Most elements and

diagrams are

present and well

designed

Some components

are missing or not

properly designed

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Goals,

objective,

assumptions,

constraints

Very well

defined

Most of the

areas defined

Some areas

defined

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Appendices

References

Excellent use of

sources. Accurate

referencing. Obvious

that outstanding

effort made

Very good

effort

Good effort made

but not

outstanding

Acceptable

Poor, not

acceptable

Presentation

Excellent,

outstanding

effort made

Very good

effort

Good effort made

but not

outstanding

Made some

effort, but only

acceptable

Poor, not

acceptable

Prepared by: Samira Baho Moderated by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail April, 2018

Marking Rubric for Access database: Total Marks 25

Grade/Mark HD 80% -100% D 70%-79% C 60%-69% P 50%-59% Fail <50

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Splash page

Project opens

properly

Project opens

properly, but

not enough

effort

Generally OK,

with some

deficiencies.

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Data

structure

All tables and

attributes have

been included

Most tables

and attributes

have been

included

Some

deficiencies in

the tables and

attributes

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Functionality

All functions are

properly covered

Most functions

are properly

covered

Some functions

are missing or

not properly

covered

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

Forms

All forms are

present and well

designed

Most forms

are present

and well

designed

Some forms are

missing or not

properly

designed

OK, with some

obvious

shortcomings.

Poor, not

acceptable

General

navigation and

appearance

Excellent,

outstanding effort

made

Very good

effort

Good effort

made but not

outstanding

Acceptable

Poor, not

acceptable