short essay
hahahaha
BloggingRubric.docxBlogging Rubric
|
Title |
Catchy, clever title
5 points |
Great title
4 points |
Good Title
3 points |
Decent Title
2 points |
No Title
0 points |
|
|
|
Abstract |
Excellent
5 points |
Great
4 points |
Good
3 points |
Average
2 points |
Missing
0 points |
|
|
|
Discussion of Research |
Excellent discussion of research question, methods, and findings
15 points |
Great discussion of research question, methods, and findings.
14 points |
Good discussion of research question, methods, and findings
13 points |
Average discussion of research questions, methods, and findings
12 points |
Poor discussion of research questions, methods, and findings
11 points |
Discussion of Research methods mostly missing
10 pts |
No discussion of research methods
0 points |
|
Connecting Course Materials |
Student makes excellent connections to course readings. They critically evaluated their article using class materials.
15 points |
Student makes great connections to course readings. They evaluated their article using class materials.
14 points |
Student makes good connections between their article and course readings. Connections, however, were not fully discussed.
13 points |
Student makes average connections to course material. The connections were brief or superficial
12 points |
Student makes poor connections to class material. They do not explain how their article relates to class.
11 points |
Student hardly connects with course materials at all.
10 pts |
Student makes no reference to course readings at all.
0 points |
|
References |
Excellent citations in ASA style.
5 points |
Great references with few errors
4 points |
Used incorrect style or had many errors.
3 points |
Poor references.
2 points |
No references.
0 points |
|
|
|
Style |
Paper is well-written, well-organized and free of errors.
5 points |
This is a great paper that could be improved with some minor adjustments
4 points |
This is a good paper that would benefit from some editing and organization.
3 points |
This is a paper that requires some heavy editing.
2 points |
This paper is full of errors, rendering it nearly unreadable
0 points |
|
|
