BlockchainHypeVsReality.pdf

computerweekly.com 10-16 September 2019 21

Industry experts believe blockchain is a technology that has the potential to affect the business of most IT profession-als in the next five years. Analyst Gartner has forecast that by 2023, blockchain will support the global movement and tracking of $2tn of goods and services.

It is regarded by many industry watchers as a disrupting force in the financial world. A PwC global financial technology (fintech) survey found that 56% of respondents recognise the importance of blockchain. At the same time, however, 57% admit to being unsure about or unlikely to respond to this trend.

Start witH tHe HaSH Blockchain is effectively a shared ledger between a group of people – for example, a group of companies that work together to produce a service or product. What makes blockchain differ- ent is the fact that the history of the changes – past transactions, for example – are immutable.

Essentially, the historical entries become read-only and unchangeable. This is due to the fact that each blockchain entry relies on the hash – a computed value including part of a previous block as part of its hashing calculation for the current block. This means that if a previous block is somehow modi- fied or corrupted, its hash value will change and therefore the values after that point become broken, making the tampering evident for all to see.

One example where blockchain technology can be used is where several companies come together to provide or consume

Blockchain: hype vs reality Regarded by many as a disruptive force in finance and beyond, blockchain technology presents a number of complex challenges that must be overcome before it can truly deliver on its promises. Stuart Burns reports

BUYER’S GUIDE TO BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY | PART 1 OF 3

Home

IU RI

IM O

TO V/

A D

O BE

computerweekly.com 10-16 September 2019 22

Home

News

HMRC under fire over ‘scaremongering’ IR35 letters targeting GSK contractors

Ransomware has evolved into a serious enterprise threat

How Defra has been preparing its IT systems for any Brexit eventuality

Editor’s comment

Buyer’s guide to blockchain

Chasing down hackers through security analytics

How councils are using technology to support adult social care

Downtime

services, usually under long-term contracts. It can be complex and cumbersome to manage contracts involving several individu- als, when multiple documents are involved and everyone needs to agree on the same contract versions and details. Over time, changes will occur that also need to be managed and agreed on.

Managing contracts in blockchain, however, means that rather than physical bits of paper being passed around, it becomes possi- ble to mathematically guarantee the contract documents are as intended and the appropriate (digital) sign- off is a part of the chain. That chain can be verified by any of the parties as required. This is a key part of the whole blockchain concept.

an early trial In 2016, Barclays and Wave com- pleted what they described as a “world first” by using blockchain technology to handle the docu- mentation to approve a fund trans- action, which was made through the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Swift). The letter of credit transaction between Ornua (formerly the Irish Dairy Board) and Seychelles Trading Company used distributed ledger technology via the Wave platform to enable all parties involved to see the documents they needed and transmit them where required on a decentralised network. This removed some of

the inefficiencies of traditional international trade and brought completion timescales down from weeks to a few hours. It is not hard to see how the use of blockchain could be extended to include many different types of information, eventually encom- passing the general public.

For instance, an article by McKinsey estimates that using block- chain to sign up new retail banking customers has the potential to

create up to $1bn of savings in oper- ating costs globally and reduce reg- ulatory fines by between $2bn and $3bn. “In addition, we expect block- chain solutions to reduce annual losses from fraud by $7bn to $9bn,” McKinsey stated.

management cHallengeS However, setting up and managing blockchain is a complex process that requires skilled design. As Gartner notes, a distributed ledger requires the recording and replicat-

ing of data in a secure manner. This is a complex mechanism with significant computational load (called mining). As such, blockchain has rather large scalability issues. Verification of blocks can take several minutes, which makes blockchain inap- propriate for real-time transactions.

Each blockchain consumer may need to verify an entire trans- action history, which is very inefficient and requires a high

A distributed ledger requires the recording And replicAting

of dAtA in A secure mAnner. this is A complex mechAnism with

significAnt computAtionAl loAd. As such, blockchAin hAs rAther

lArge scAlAbility issues

BUYER’S GUIDE

computerweekly.com 10-16 September 2019 23

Home

News

HMRC under fire over ‘scaremongering’ IR35 letters targeting GSK contractors

Ransomware has evolved into a serious enterprise threat

How Defra has been preparing its IT systems for any Brexit eventuality

Editor’s comment

Buyer’s guide to blockchain

Chasing down hackers through security analytics

How councils are using technology to support adult social care

Downtime

computational workload. New platforms are being developed that explore alternative approaches to verifying the integrity of blockchain transactions. These include massively diverse public ledgers for verifying historic transactions.

Other ideas include having a random pool of machines that vali- date the blockchain and publicly announce the results of the vali- dation, saving everyone repeating the same compute-intensive functions. The very nature of these random machines and

frequency with which they are rotated means that discovering and trying to attack verification hosts should be extremely difficult.

All current blockchain systems have some limitations in terms of scaling. So, such techniques may not scale to the level needed for blockchain to be a viable replacement to existing payment processing networks. However, there is now growing interest in new distributed processor workload platforms, such as Golam, and the use of hardware-based acceleration, application-specific

BUYER’S GUIDE

IU RI

IM O

TO V/

A D

O BE

All current blockchAin systems hAve some limitAtions in terms of scAling

computerweekly.com 10-16 September 2019 24

Home

News

HMRC under fire over ‘scaremongering’ IR35 letters targeting GSK contractors

Ransomware has evolved into a serious enterprise threat

How Defra has been preparing its IT systems for any Brexit eventuality

Editor’s comment

Buyer’s guide to blockchain

Chasing down hackers through security analytics

How councils are using technology to support adult social care

Downtime

integrated circuits (Asics) and graphics processing units (GPUs), all of which aim to accelerate processing for blockchain.

Beyond BuSineSS contractS There are many uses for blockchain technology in finance and beyond, but currently most of these technologies, with the exception of cryptocurrencies, are aimed squarely at the busi- ness to business market (B2B).

For blockchain to move beyond small-scale trials and experimenta- tion, the whole software and hard- ware infrastructure stack needs to scale to support larger and larger volumes of transactions.

In 2018, a KPMG paper looking at uses for blockchain described the challenges of integrating blockchain into existing, legacy processes. The paper warned that organisations need to be aware that their legacy systems may not be designed to interact with block- chain systems or capitalise on the advantages they offer.

“Comprehensive examination of interoperability and integra- tion is essential,” the KPMG paper stated. “Given the immuta- bility of transactions, it is essential that the proper mechanisms are in place to prevent incorrect data from being written onto the blockchain.”

Another area of concern is the privacy of financial transactions. According to PwC, the business benefits for many players, or even the industry, will not materialise if the “trust issue” is not addressed effectively. For PwC, the hurdles that lie ahead include understanding whether or not the public ledger can be hacked.

From a privacy perspective, if several different organisations are involved in a transaction that uses blockchain, not all group

members should have access to the data held within the blockchain. However, they still need to verify the blockchain’s integrity. Such secrecy flies in the face of the classic block- chain ethos.

Any transactions that go through Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are recorded as part of the block- chain process. Information such as wallet transactions, IP address and other details are collected. Being able to trace all wallet transactions could allow any interested parties to infer not only spending patterns,

but also socio-economic status and similar. It may not give away exactly what is being purchased, but this information can help build an overall picture of someone’s online spending habits.

Today, it is very much an exploration of what is possible. As with any technology, over time blockchain will become more refined and mature, and no doubt privacy capable and expandable as needed. n

BUYER’S GUIDE

the business benefits of blockchAin will not

mAteriAlise if the trust issue is not Addressed effectively.

hurdles include understAnding whether or not the public

ledger cAn be hAcked

Copyright of Computer Weekly is the property of TechTarget, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.