answering questions.

Date: 5/26/2017

IAS Learning Objecting Writing and Communication

Effective communication through writing allows someone to relay his or her intended message to the audience correctly, in a way that facilitates understanding and is unlikely to result in misinterpretation. Practice through writing has contributed highly towards my achievement on communication skills. The paper showed my prowess of communicating through writing.

I was able to define the model of international relations and describe its position in the contemporary world in the introductory part. Moreover, I noted development of technology and globalization as the factors that influence international relations and its policies.

The theory of liberalism is one that proved to be satisfactory and explain the concept of modern world vividly promoting international cohesion. As such, I elaborated the reason that I felt that pragmatism should be a core part in international matters. My reasoning was that negotiation should come before military engagement in international relations.

Realism and liberalism being the main hypotheses that describe international relations were explained explicitly. The first theory supports collaboration of states for mutual benefits, while the latter focuses on every nation having power over others. I gave an in-depth explanation the reason that I opposed the second theory as it was the source of conflict in the current world and can lead to war.

The paper in my words explain on the reasons as to why a world government is important citing its merits and demerits. The merits are several, examples of economic growth, averting inequalities and war that arise due to boundaries established. However, I noted similar to arguments of other scholars, the practicality of the one government system is not feasible. Reasons stated are no single constitution can favor the whole world. Also, poor leadership may eradicate humanity through irrational decisions.

There exist conflicting opinions regarding the establishment of a world government. In my opinion a unified administration is not such a good idea with the complex societies and world diversity. Scholars state that a world government can be best established similar to an international organization. Although, what they don’t understand is that organization such as the United Nations promote co-operation rather than exert authority. I believe that developed couuntries will develop superiority over underdeveloped states. Hence, a world government is not a solution to urban problems. What can promote cohesion is having strong bonds and mutual coexistence.

Even though governance may be centralized, I realized that inequality will still prevail as power sharing will not be entirely fair. A world government may not be appropriate as it is not an ultimate solution towards the inequalities in the society for both male and females. Therefore, I realized that unification is a task that can be best performed at the ground level.

I finalized the paper by discussing the concept of a world government, where I presented various experts’ opinions on the issue. Its supporters feel that it could increase economic growth and end rivalry among nations, while opponents claim that it is unpractical. I supported the latter opinion in the essay.

Such successful writing motivates me to continue writing. I look forward to writing about the UK, as I am interested in understanding the way she handles her economic issues, and life after Brexit.