Help

Please reply to following 2 posts. Reply means read post and provide a reply what is written. Clearly identify your replies (which reply is for which post) in your submission. Please make your reply posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:

· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic

· Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor

· Provide extensive additional information on the topic

· Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail

· Share an applicable personal experience

· Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)

· Make an argument concerning the topic.

At least 1 (scholarly) journal source should be used for each reply. Be your references in correct APA 7 format and cite each reference at least once, but as many times as you rely on it. Citations support each sentence relying on a reference, not an entire paragraph. Do not use direct quotes, rather rephrase the author's words and continue to use in-text citations.

Reply to each post needs to be 250 words minimum, with separate journal reference

Post1:

A security strategy should be structured on a regular, predictable, and repeatable basis. A security strategy should be of high quality and be well thought out. A security strategy should be simple, easy to understand, and easily repeatable. Physical security is the process of collecting, assessing, controlling, and reporting information relating to security risks for a given system or asset. It is the art of using an existing set of known controls, relationships, procedures, and relationships to limit or contain a threat's effects, such as a vulnerability or vulnerability before it is exposed to the target system (Guo et al., 2020). The security posture of the organization can be assessed in terms of objectives and tactics. If a security audit is to be successful, the company must understand and manage its IT security. Without the proper guidance, IT security will likely never be successful. For organizations with many IT security controls in place, this section of the book is perfect for explaining and explaining a security audit. The physical security process is described at the beginning to takes a physical security architecture as the system's architecture was conceptualized based on the assumption that an organization's system management. In simple terms, a physical security threat consists of malicious activities that access data and systems and compromise network-connected hardware and software (Chowdhry et al., 2020).

A physical security threat can be the same or different from a cyber threat. Physical threats, or more accurately, attack surfaces, can include everything from an employee stealing personal information to a malicious program executing over the network. The goal is to get a particular vulnerability exposed and used to exploit it in some way. One aspect of the business is the physical security and the threats that the business faces (Chowdhry et al., 2020). These include security threats that are unique to the business, unique to the organization and not part of the business process. One example is business continuity—when unexpected events occur, such as power failures, unexpected mechanisms fail, or critical data is stolen, the business needs to be prepared to recover the value of that data, even if it takes some time. Although this can happen to many organizations, many managers and leaders find the process of identifying risks very valuable (Chowdhry et al., 2020). The COSO ERM approach to enterprise risk management emphasizes continuous improvement. By monitoring the data that flows between the business interfaces and the various network segments, the security architects can assess the interfaces' weaknesses and vulnerabilities, both to avoid those attacks occurring as expected and to detect the attack patterns before they become a reality. Many threats are not really in the blue but are the result of business or strategic imperatives that are, of course, difficult to disentangle from what might be called core practices (Guo et al., 2020).

Post2:

The usual response is anywhere there are or might be corporate assets involved. Had Brad used a company vehicle stationed at the parking lot for the client. Then maybe Alison might make allowances for an unintentional break-in concerning Brad's things, but even then Alison is not liable for their safeguard. On either side, when major players are also valuable assets (advisory staff at most businesses, cyber-security experts working in critical roles, heads of state, and so on) safeguards and protections typically apply as part of asset protection and risk reduction to include them and their property. Of course, whether the danger to workers or what they are bringing with them becomes a concern, it starts to make sense to protect the parking garage with key cards and install CCTV cameras at each floor. To put it another way, if the risk of enabling break-ins to happen exceeds that of implementing preventive measures, placing them in place is wise (LaPadula, 2019).

A corporation is making a range of policies to protect information and physical resources for the organization. Likewise, legislation should be adopted to protect the assets of employers and staff. The primary goal of physical protection is to safeguard the organization's assets and equipment. So the sole responsibility of physical safety is to protect the workers as they are an essential asset to the corporation. Their protection is the initial priority and the protection of the services preceded (LaPadula, 2019). Examples of physical control involve construction material forms, perimeter safety including fencing and locks, and guards. Retribution, rejection, and then pause are the safeguards used to safeguard the climate (Stallings, 2019).

The security controls that are enforced to maintain physical safety can be categorized into three factions: financial, technological and physical. Because these are the same terms that are used to define access controls, the emphasis on the physical security dimensions of these controls is important. Facility design and selection, facility planning, staffing monitoring, awareness training, and emergency response and protocols provide administrative physical security measures. Professional physical security checks include security controls, network monitoring, detectors, CCTV, monitoring, ventilation, and power supplies; and fire detection and prevention. Safety personnel will be interested in issues related to site and service design. Therefore many essential physical security aspects that are necessary for the survival of logical protection may be ignored. With security staff involved in the development of physical facilities, the user can be confident that the long-term safety priorities of the user as an entity are not only supported by legislation, workers and electronic equipment, but by the building itself (Stallings, 2019).

A company makes a variety of policies to protect the company's data and physical equipment. Similarly, policies should be made to protect employee and employee properties. The hiring of a security guard is the best option for mitigates the risk of physical damage for both sides. A security guard is an individual that a company has hired and paid to protect the property, assets, and staff. Remember in particular that a security guard is quite distinct from a doorman. Whereas a gate-man is someone who manages or manages at the gate. i.e. Gate-man opens and closes the door to incoming and outgoing tourists; a security guard will have certain specific duties (Kaufman, 2019).

If the employee is working on the workplace, then the security of the employee and his property such as a vehicle, laptop, and other gadgets should be the responsibility of the company. For physical security, the help of security guards and security equipment should be taken such as CCTV and other types of alarm equipment (Kaufman, 2019).