DNP-BIO-Y

ACTIVITY 1-

EACH ACTIVITY MUST BE IN A DIFFERENT WORD DOCUMENT

-Select one research paper on a topic of interest to you that reports quantitative research. Summarize the research by answering the following questions:

1. Identify where the steps in the scientific method lie within the paper.

2. Decide whether or not the paper follows the belief outlined in the list of beliefs.

3. Identify the population and the sample being studied. 4. Identify the variables being measured, and state which scale

you think the measurement would be made on. 5. Suggest what measurement and/or design errors have been

made. Discuss how the errors may have impacted the conclusions.

6. Finally, if a replication study was undertaken utilizing equivalent measurements of the same variables would it show the same relationships as in the previous study? Explain your position.


• Your research summary should be a minimum of 2 pages plus your title and reference pages. ◦ It should include at least 2 academic source within the

past 5 years, formatted and cited in APA with IN-TEXT CITATIONS

THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN CAN’T HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OF ARTIFICIAL

INTELLIGENCE DATA . PLEASE ADHERE TO

INSTRUCTIONS , THIS IS FOR THE HIGHEST ACADEMIC LEVEL NEED TO BE ORIGINAL ACCORDING THE REQUIREMENTS.

-CHECK GRAMMAR AND SPELLING AS WELL.

RUBRIC ACTIVITY 1

- Official Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pt

s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Professi onalism Concept Applicat ion

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The student meets less than 70% of the required content

20 pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Gramm ar Written Commu nication

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

20 pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Commu nication Specific Formatti ng

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90 % - 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the

20 pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Critical and Logical Thinkin g Thought analysis process

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well- thought process. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary

20 pt s

Total Points: 100

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Academ ic Literacy Quality of Sources and APA Citation s

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The following criteria would apply, supporting information

20 pt s

ACTIVITY 2- EACH ACTIVITY MUST BE IN A DIFFERENT WORD

DOCUMENT

-Review the scenarios below. For each method, determine if a probability sampling or non probability sampling method is used. For each question, determine if this an effective way to determine patient satisfaction. Why or why not?

1. The CEO of a regional hospital wants to survey patient satisfaction after being discharged from the hospital. 

2. A case manager is sent to the discharge area to interview patients as they are leaving the hospital.

3. You have the nurses on the floor distribute a questionnaire to each patient asking they complete the survey and return it at the discharge counter before they leave.

4. The CEO randomly selects a set of patients about to be discharged from the hospital and questions those that they have selected.

5. The CEO groups the patients by departments and randomly selects a patient from each department and surveys that patient to evaluate the department.
  

Submission Instructions:

◦ Answer each question with a minimum of 2 paragraphs. Your submission must include a properly formatted title and reference pages in APA 7 TH EDITION FORMAT

• It should include at least 2 academic sources within the past 5 years and with IN-TEXT CITATIONS, formatted and cited in APA.

• 2 PAGES

THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN CAN’T HAVE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OF ARTIFICIAL

INTELLIGENCE DATA . PLEASE ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS , THIS IS FOR THE HIGHEST ACADEMIC LEVEL NEED TO BE ORIGINAL ACCORDING THE REQUIREMENTS.

-CHECK GRAMMAR AND SPELLING AS WELL.

- EACH ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED IN A DIFFEREN WORD DOCUMENT.

RUBRIC: - Official Open Answer Questions Rubric - Official Open Answer Questions Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Content

40 to >36.0 pts Excellent Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate complete mastery of the content by including highly appropriate, detailed information and excellent examples. 36 to >32.0 pts Good Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate a good mastery of the content by including basic information and examples. 32 to >28.0 pts Fair Some responses do not answer the question being asked or provide incorrect information. Response(s) demonstrate partial mastery of the content. 28 to >24.0 pts Poor Responses demonstrate lack of mastery of the information. They may be off topic, incorrect, or include poor examples and details.

40 pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Content Quality of Informat ion

30 to >27.0 pts Excellent Response(s) thoroughly identify the problem, situation or issue at hand and provide an adequate conclusion / solution supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples 27 to >24.0 pts Good Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but only partially supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples. 24 to >21.0 pts Fair Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but they are not supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples. 21 to >18.0 pts Poor Response(s) do/does not identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Absent or unclear conclusion / solution.

30 pt s

Total Points: 100

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Commu nication Organiz ation

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Writing is well structured with a clear beginning, a middle and conclusion (as appropriate). Examples and supporting evidence are inserted to strengthen the response. Information and thought process flows logically. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Writing is structured and includes examples and supporting evidence to strengthen the response. Information and thought process flows logically. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Writing somewhat disorganized with limited examples and supporting evidence. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor Writing is disorganized with few examples and

20 pt s

This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Writing Mechan ics

10 to >9.0 pts Excellent Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors. 9 to >8.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 6 to >0 pts

10 pt s