Articles summary
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=lesa20
Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A
ISSN: 1093-4529 (Print) 1532-4117 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lesa20
Biogenic vocs emissions and its impact on ozone formation in major cities of China
Min Shao , Meiping Zhao , Yuanhang Zhang , Lxin Peng & Jinlong Li
To cite this article: Min Shao , Meiping Zhao , Yuanhang Zhang , Lxin Peng & Jinlong Li (2000) Biogenic vocs emissions and its impact on ozone formation in major cities of China, Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 35:10, 1941-1950, DOI: 10.1080/10934520009377089
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520009377089
Published online: 15 Dec 2008.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 163
View related articles
Citing articles: 15 View citing articles
J. ENVIRON. SCI. HEALTH, A35(10), 1941-1950 (2000)
BIOGENIC VOCS EMISSIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON OZONE FORMATION IN MAJOR CITIES OF CHINA
Key Wordy: Isoprene, monoterpene, biogenic emission, dependence, ozone
Min Shao*1, Meiping Zhao2, Yuanhang Zhang1, Lxin Peng1, Jinlong Li3
1 State Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Center for Environmental Sciences; 2 Department of Chemistry;3 Department of Technical
Physics; Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
ABSTRACT
A measurement campaign was performed in two large cities in China, Beijing
and Guangzhou, to investigate biogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) using a GC-FID system and the enclosure chamber technique. Four typical
types of trees, namely pine, cypress, poplar and Chinese-scholar tree were studied.
The influences of temperature and light intensity on VOC emissions were analyzed
using algorithms derived from what is currently understood about VOC emission
mechanisms. Biogenic VOC emission fluxes in these two cities were estimated. A
2-D air quality model was developed to assess the role of biogenic VOC emissions in
the ground-level ozone formation in Beijing and Guangzhou.
INTRODUCTION
Within last decade, due to rapid economic development, urban air quality in
China has increasingly worsened. The air pollution is shifting from the problems
Corresponding author; email: [email protected]
1941
Copyright © 2000 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com
1942 SHAOETAL.
associated with coal-burning to photochemical smog, caused by vehicle emissions in
both Beijing and Guangzhou (Zhang et al., 1998). As the ambient O3 concentration
has dramatically increased, the photochemical smog is becoming a serious air
pollution problem in the city and the surrounding areas. Being one of the major
precursors of atmospheric O3, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) data are essential
for knowing the chemical processes of smog formation. Studies on Biogenic volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), which are much more active in the air than those from
anthropogenic sources, are urgently required for understanding the trends of
atmospheric oxidation potential.
Mechanisms of VOCs emissions from plants have recently been studied
intensively (Sharkey, 1996; Lichtenthaler et al., 1997). Algorithms quantifying the
influence of temperature and light intensity on VOC emission rates were developed
( Guenhter et al., 1993; Schuh et al., 1997) and were employed to estimate VOC
emissions in many regions worldwide (Guenther et al., 1995; Ciccioli et al., 1997). In
China, a measurement campaign has been performed since 1991 to investigate VOC
emissions from the four main genetic types of trees, which are pine (Pinus
Tabulaeformis), cypress (patycladus orientalis), poplar (Populus sp.) and
Chinese-scholar tree (Sophora japonicd). The VOC composition of the emissions
from these trees, the emission rates and the influence of temperature and light were
investigated. By using a two dimensional air quality model, the roles of biogenic
VOC emissions in ground-level ozone formation in Beijing and Guangzhou were
studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
VOCs emitted from trees were analyzed using Varian-3400 gas chromatography
with flame ionization detector (GC-FID, fused silicon capillary column: DB-1, 60 m
x 0.3.15 mm i.d.). A chamber enclosure technique was used for sampling, by
wrapping one to several branches or whole plants, depending on the size of the tree.
During sampling, necessary environmental parameters, such as ambient temperature
and light intensity, were also measured. A 1.5 m3 polyethylene polymer bag was used
as the enclosure chamber. Air samples were compressed by a grease-free pump into 4
VOCs EMISSIONS AND OZONE FORMATION 1943
L stainless steel canisters to a pressure of about 2 bar. The canisters were then
connected to sample loading loop of GC-FID, which was kept in a cold trap at
temperature of-80 °C. Air samples were injected under their own pressure into the
loop to be pre-concentrated. Then the frozen samples were programmatically heated
at a speed of 6 °C/min until the temperature reached 200 °C. Under the experimental
conditions, C4-C10 VOCs were sufficiently separated and quantified.
By measuring the concentration differences after a period of time in the
enclosure chamber, the emission rates of VOCs were calculated by:
VmxAxAt K)
where Ovoc is emission rate of the VOC species (ug cm'2 hr'1); ACvoc is
concentration difference (ppb) in chamber during a time period of At (hour); V is the
volume of enclosure chamber (m3), Vm is molar volume (Vm =24 L/mol); A is leaf
area (one side) of enclosed plant (cm2) and M is molecular weight of VOC species.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
VOCs Composition and Emission Rate
VOCs emitted from pine, cypress, poplar and Chinese-scholar tree include
isoprene, monoterpene as well as some alkanes and alkenes. The predominant VOCs
species emitted from coniferous species, like pine and cypress, were monoterpenes,
while 90% of the total VOCs released from deciduous trees as poplar and
Chinese-scholar, was isoprene (Table 1). The composition of VOCs from these trees
did not change significantly with the season except for Chinese-scholar tree. It is very
interesting that from the measurements Chinese-scholar trees emitted considerable
amounts of monoterpenes while in blossom, but the monoterpenes emissions were
below detection limits during the non-blossoming stage.
Chinese-scholar is quite a rare species, emitting different VOCs during different
season. It is well known that production of isoprene and monoterpene in plants, are
all compounds-specific enzyme involved processes (Sharkey, 1996). Plants release
different VOCs because they have different internal enzymes. Therefore, the
blossoming of Chinese-scholar trees might also be a process that activates enzymes
1944 SHAOETAL.
TABLE 1 VOCs Species from Emission of Various Trees
( in Parentheses, its Percentage Lower than 1% of Emissions) Tree VOCs species _ _ Pine a-terpiene, a-pinene, d-Iimonene, A3-carene,
isoprene Cypress a-terpiene, a-pinene, d-limonene, A3-carene Poplar isoprene (a-pinene) Chinesescholar tree Non-blossoming: isoprene (n-pentene, n-pentane,
n-nonane) Blossoming: isoprene, a-terpiene, a-pinene, d-limonene, A3-carene
for monoterpene production. Detailed studies are needed for more a complete
understanding of biogenic VOCs emission mechanisms of Chinese-scholar trees.
Not only were the compositions of the VOCs emissions from the four types of
trees different, but also the absolute emission rates differed greatly as well. Table 2
lists emission rates of typical VOCs at constant temperatures and light intensities (25
°C, 300 lux, hereafter set as standard condition). The standard emission rates given in
Table 2 did not show systematic seasonal variation in our measurements.
Chinese-scholar tree had a relatively wider range of standard emission rates for
isoprene because of the blossoming.
Influence of Temperature and Light Intensity
Temperature and light intensity are believed to be the most important factors for
short term biogenic VOCs emissions (Schuh et al., 1997). For conifers, the influence
of light on monoterpene emissions, from pine and cypress, was neglected, so that
only temperature dependence following the pool evaporation process was considered:
CT (2) î T • Ts
where O,erpene is the emission rates of VOC (ug cm" 2 hr"1) at leaf temperature T (K),
and Osterpene is Standardemission rate); Cy/R is an empirical constant.
Figure 1 shows the measurement results for pine which fit the above algorithm.
The CT/R value for a-terpinene was 19980 ± 8500. The value for Cypress
VOCs EMISSIONS AND OZONE FORMATION 1945
TABLE 2 The Emission Rates of VOCs Emitted from Typical Types of Trees
Types
Typical compounds
'ï'voc (Hg/cm2-hr)
Pine
Monoterpenes
0.14-0.34 i
Cypress
Monoterpenes
>.7xl0'4-28.2xl0'4
Poplar
Isoprene
0.10-0.14
Chinesescholar tree
Isoprene
0.016-0.11
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
S 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5
0.00330 0.00335 0.00340 0.00345 0.00350
l/T (IC1)
FIGURE 1 Temperature dependence of a-terpinene emission rates from pine.
-
- lnE = -19980/T + 68. 686 r2 = 0.9294
1 i 1
monoterpene emission rates obtained from the fitting was 18750 ± 7400. This was
generally in agreement with the results reported by Goldan et al. (1995).
The isoprene emission rates, of the two deciduous trees, were both temperature
and light sensitive. Guenther et al. (1993) developed an algorithm to describe
biogenic isoprene emissions:
<b iso prene = «5 isoprene • C L a • I
exp R
T - Ts
\ + a 2 • I2 1 + exp - T2
R
T - T M T - 7 \
(3)
where Ojs o p r e n e is the isoprene emission rate at leaf temperature T (K) and light
intensity 1 (lux). OSjSOprene is the standard emission rate; CL, a and CTI and Cj2 are
empirical constants; TM is optimal enzyme temperature. Since the leaf temperature T
1946 SHAOETAL.
is normally much lower than TM, which is generally around 318 K, the denominator
of the temperature term can be set as 1.
The fit for poplar isoprene emission rates obtained the parameters CL, a and CTi.
The result of the fit is shown in Figure 2, when leaf temperature T was 302+2 K.
It is noteworthy that isoprene emission rates of pine showed a very similar
diurnal variation as the monoterpenes (Figure 3). The plot showed that monoterpene
emission rates were nearly constant at the same temperature, whether during the day
or at night, but the nocturnal isoprene emission rate was nearly 1/3 of the daytime
emissions, under similar temperatures. This result suggested that the algorithm (3)
cannot explain isoprene emissions from pines. The algorithm of Schuh et al. (1997)
was proved as a tool to describe the behavior. The algorithm assumed that biogenic
VOC emissions were due to two independent processes: pool evaporation and
biosynthesis related activities.
In field measurements, it was difficult to investigate the influence of temperature
and light intensity on VOCs emission rates independently. To make an estimate with
reasonable precision of the VOC flux on a city scale, we adopted algorithm (2) to
describe monoterpene emissions from pine and cypress trees, and used algorithm (3)
to simulate isoprene emissions form poplar and Chinesescholar trees.
Emission Flux Estimate
The seasonal variations of both isoprene and monoterpene emissions were
assumed here to be due to temperature and light intensity changes. In our estimation,
an annual mean temperature was chosen to be 11.5 °C. Effective isoprene emission
time in a year was estimated to be 2100 hours, because nocturnal and winter
emissions were under the detection limits. Isoprene emissions from pine were
excluded, because the total amount was negligible at the city scale. Monoterpene
emissions from Chinese-scholar trees were not taken into account because its quantity
was unavailable.
Based on the data and assumptions above, the isoprene and monoterpene
emission flux in Beijing was calculated and listed in Table 3.
By integrating the data of forest area information into VOCs emission rates, the
flux of biogenic VOCs in Beijing was estimated. The VOCs emissions from
VOCs EMISSIONS AND OZONE FORMATION 1947
~ 0.150 JZ
% 0.140
0.130
cd S 0.120 o "3 0.110
CO
w 0.100
-Emission rate (measured) Emission rate (modeled))
250 300 350 400
Light intensity (Lux)
450
FIGURE 2 Isoprene emission rates from poplar fit to algorithm of Guenther et al. (1993).
0.500
0.400 cd j a u f 0.300 c N co g
CD
•- 3- 0.200
0.100
0.000
-a-terpinene •isoorene (xlOO)
b-pinene temperature
35.0
25.0
5.0
-5.0
15.0 £ cd
eu
eu
- v v <b-
Time (measured in May 8-9, 1993)
FIGURE 3 Diurnal variation of isoprene and selected monoterpene emission rates of oil pine.
TABLE 3 Isoprene and Monoterpene Emission Flux in Beijing
Species Pine Cypress Poplar Chinesescholar Compounds Forest area * (106 m2) Emission flux (Ton/Year)
monoterpene monoterpene isoprene isoprene 163 163 492 492
5100 51 1500 3000
* The specified forest areas for individual tree species are not available, it was assumed that pine and cypress has the same sharing in area of conifer, poplar and Chinese-scholar tree has the same sharing in area of deciduous forest.
1948 SHAOETAL.
VOCs Emissions in Sources
Beijing Guangzhou
Industries
2.91 6.11
Beijing TABLE 4
and Guangzhou Area Vehicular source emissions 0.42 0.44
5.07 7.88
Cities (104 ton Biogenic emission 4.97 12.15
C/year) Total
13.37 26.60
TABLE 5 The Influence of VOCs Emission on Urban Ozone Concentration
Beijing
Guangzhou
Biogenic sources
1* 0 1 1 0 1
Manmade sources
1 1 0 1 1 0
Ozone concentration (daily average,
ppb) 44.6 37.0 8.6 63.1 30.9 41.4
Change of ozone
concentration (%)
Current -17.0 -80.7 Current -51.0 -34.4
* 1 means 100% of current emissions.
anthropogenic sources were investigated in the UNDP CPR96/305 project. The same
procedure was implemented for Guangzhou city (Table 4). For use in the air quality
model, isoprene and monoterpene data were summed up. Both were considered as
double-bond molecules in the CBM-IV chemical mechanisms.
The Role of Biogenic VOCs in Ozone Formation
A 2-D Eulerian air quality model was developed to simulate the ozone formation
in Beijing (Peng, 1999). This model has two dimensions at horizontal level, and
vertically ranged from the ground to the mixing layer height. It adopts the CBM-IV
mechanism for chemical reactions. The inputs of the model were the wind field, the
diffusion coefficient, the mixing layer and the source inventory.
To assess the influence of VOCs emissions in urban ozone formation, two
scenarios were set for both Beijing and Guangzhou, in which biogenic VOCs and
anthropogenic VOCs were assumed to be zero. From the model run, the
corresponding ground-level ozone reductions were obtained (Table 5).
VOCs EMISSIONS AND OZONE FORMATION 1949
The 2-D air quality model showed that ground-level ozone concentrations were
sensitive to VOCs in both cities. The results in Table 5 demonstrated that
anthropogenic VOCs emissions played key role in the control ozone concentrations in
Beijing. But in Guangzhou, biogenic VOCs emissions were more important than
manmade sources in ozone formation, indicating that ozone abatement in Guangzhou
would be a very hard task.
CONCLUSION
The isoprene and monoterpene emissions from the four main tree species were
investigated. The deciduous trees Poplar and Chinese-scholar trees were found to be
big isoprene emitters, and light intensity was the most important environmental
parameter affecting the emission rate. The Chinese-scholar tree emits monoterpene
during the vegetative stage of blossoming. Further studies are required to examine the
detailed plant physiology of this process and determine the methodology to quantify
the monoterpene emission rates, if the emissions are locally important.
The monoterpene emission from conifers can be modeled following a pool
evaporation process and hence only leaf temperatures are dependent. Isoprene
emissions of oil pine are quantitatively less important though, it has been revealed
that both light intensity and temperature may have influence on its emissions from the
two independent processes: pool evaporation and processes in parallel with
biosynthetic activities.
Biogenic VOCs emission fluxes in Beijing and Guangzhou were estimated.
Together with investigations of other VOC emission sources, a 2-D air quality model
was employed to simulate ground-level ozone concentrations in both cities. It is
revealed that in Guangzhou biogenic sources contribute slightly less than
anthropogentic emissions, but have a more important role in ozone formation. The
ground-level ozone concentration in Beijing was mainly controlled by VOCs from
manmade sources.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research work was partly supported by UNDP project CPR/96/305. The
1950 SHAO ET AL.
authors would like to express gratefulness to Dr. Juergen Wildt for the valuable
discussion about biogenic emission mechanisms.
REFERENCES
Ciccioli, P., Fabozzi, C , Brancaleoni, E. et al., J. Geophys. Res., 102(D19). 23319-23328 (1997).
Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C , Fehsenfeld, F. C , J. Geophys. Res, 100(D12), 25945-25963 (1995).
Guenther, A., Zimmerman, P. R. et. al., J. Geophys. Res., 98(D7), 12609-12617 (1993).
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D. et al., J. Geophys. Res 100(D5), 8873-8892 (1995).
Lichtenthaler, H. K., Rohmer, M., Schwender, G., J. Physiologia Plantarum, 101, 643-652(1997).
Peng, L. X., "Studies on Photochemical smog in Typical cities of China" Ph. D. dissertation, Peking Univeristy, Beeijing, China (1999).
Schuh, G., Heiden, A. C., Hoffmann, T. et al., J. Atmos. Chem., 27, 291-318 (1997).
Sharkey, T. D., Endeavour, 20(2), 74-78 (1996).
Zhang, Y. H., Shao, K. H., Tang, X. Y., Acta Scientiarum Natualium Universitatis Pekinensis, 34(2-3), 392-400 (1998).