impact of emerging technologies to the luxury in relation to digital marketing
RIta.
BIN3025-NModuleAssessment-proposalform2020-21.docx
TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL
Module assessment proposal Form 2020-21
|
External Examiner Dr Peter Watt |
||||||||||||||||
|
Module Leader Glyn Davis |
||||||||||||||||
|
Module Title : Emerging technologies for the Enterprise |
Module Code BIN3025-N |
|||||||||||||||
|
Level 6 |
Credits 20 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Mode of assessment
* Please indicate against each assessment component the learning outcomes, (for example: 1, 2, 3 etc….), which the assessment addresses.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Checklist |
Tick if included |
|||||||||||||||
|
Module guide or UTREG (including learning outcomes) |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Assignment brief |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Assessment criteria |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Marking scheme |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Resit assessment |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Module Leader (signature)
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Moderator (signature)
|
Yasser Iqbal
|
|||||||||||||||
|
TUBS PL (Programmes) (signature)
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
External Examiner comments
|
Emerging Technologies for the Enterprise
BIN3025-N
Module Assessment
The assessment of this module will take the form of:
a. Group presentations (weeks as scheduled) - weighting 20%
This mark is split into 2 parts: (a) your contribution to the presentation(s), and (b) evidence of the quality of your research. Please see student mark sheet for further details.
Each group presentation should last for not more than 20 minutes with a maximum of 4/5 students per group.
You will be preparing 4 group presentations which will all be assessed but you will only deliver to the students and staff 2 group presentations.
Please upload a copy of the topic presentations to Bb before completing the presentation to the module tutors and students.
b. Individual report - weighting 80%
You are required to write an individual report that explains the impact of emerging technologies on organizations from the perspective of your chosen topic.
The report should be approximately 3000 - 3500 words and in a suitable format appropriate to satisfy the general level 6 UG descriptors and the specific criteria for this assignment.
See assessment marking criteria and feedback grid and the assessment feedback form in appendices.
Please submit the individual report to Blackboard VLE by the end of week 13.
ICA (20%) - Module assessment feedback for group topic presentations
|
Presentation Group: |
|
|
Topic Presentation |
|
|
Student Name: |
|
|
Criterion |
Weighting % |
Topic 1 |
Topic 2 |
|
Student Topic Presentation (60%): |
|
||
|
1. Working title = |
5 |
|
|
|
1. Aims and objectives = |
10 |
|
|
|
1. The business applications = |
20 |
|
|
|
1. Practical examples and cases = |
20 |
|
|
|
1. References = |
5 |
|
|
|
Topic presentation mark TPM = X/60 =
|
Max 60% |
|
|
|
Topic research & participation mark TRP = Z/10 = |
Max 10% |
|
|
|
Overall Presentation Mark = (TPM+TRP)/70= |
|
|
|
|
Moderator confirmation: |
|
|
|
|
Group mark = (Topic 1+Topic)/2 = |
|
|
Feedback on topic performance:
|
|
|
Staff name |
Date |
|
First marker:
|
|
|
|
Moderator (if required) |
|
|
"This feedback is being given for purposes of advice and guidance and to assist your learning and development in this module. References to standards or marks are entirely provisional and subject to confirmation following University procedures. Only University Assessment Boards are able to issue confirmed, definitive marks”
ECA (80%) - Module assessment mark sheet and feedback for individual report
Please note that this is replaced by a more detailed VLE rubric marking scheme
|
Student Name:
|
ETE Assessment Report Marking Scheme |
|
Criterion
|
Weighting* % |
1st Marker % |
2nd Marker (if required) % |
|
Identification of topic and related issues =
|
15 |
|
|
|
Research/ review/supportive material =
|
20 |
|
|
|
Analysis of issues =
|
30 |
|
|
|
Structure of report =
|
15 |
|
|
|
Evidence of Learning from the module and own research & critique =
|
20 |
|
|
|
Total mark =
|
100 |
|
0% |
|
Feedback on report performance:
See attached assessment criteria map for further details |
|
|
Staff name |
Date |
|
First marker:
|
|
|
|
Moderator (if required) |
|
|
"This feedback is being given for purposes of advice and guidance and to assist your learning and development in this module. References to standards or marks are entirely provisional and subject to confirmation following University procedures. Only University Assessment Boards are able to issue confirmed, definitive marks”
Page | 1
Page | 5
Assessment marking criteria & feedback grid for report
|
|
85+ |
70-85 |
60-69 |
50-59 |
40-49 |
< 40 |
|
Criterion |
A+ |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
Identification of topic and related issues |
Critical issues clearly identified and expressed: links between issues highlighted, where relevant |
Key issues clearly identified and expressed: links between issues highlighted, where relevant |
The key issues identified and some links highlighted |
A picture of the more obvious issues presented; issues presented; little development of links |
Some gaps in the identification of issues but sufficient for potential action |
Inadequate identification of issues |
|
Research/Review/Supportive Material |
Significant evidence of extensive research |
Evidence of extensive research |
Good research |
Research good but sometimes misunderstood |
Little research, poor application of knowledge |
No research |
|
Analysis of issues |
Considerable insight into nature of problem; clear links to theory to enable understanding |
Sound insight into nature of problem; clear links to theory to enable understanding |
Some insight shown in clear analysis; some use of theory to enable understanding |
Attempts to analyse issues; understanding shown but without depth; some reference to theory |
Some lack of understanding in analysis. Limited use of theory |
Major gaps in understanding in analysis. Minimal use of theory |
|
Structure of report or essay |
Clearly structured; clear flow and integration of analysis and strategy |
Rational structured; clear flow and integration of analysis and strategy |
Clear structure; rational progression and links between sections |
Clear structure; sections tend to be compartmentalised |
Structure tends to lack flow and rationale |
Significant lack of structure and rationale |
|
Evidence of learning from the module, recommended texts, and students own research |
Considerable evidence of reading beyond basic texts. Imaginative ideas resulting from texts/research. |
Solid/extensive evidence of reading beyond basic texts. Imaginative ideas resulting from texts/research. |
Identifies key texts with clear learning outcomes |
Key texts identified with some lack of clarity in learning outcomes |
Some references cited. Gaps in learning outcomes |
Inadequate grasp of learning from the module |
