Organizational Environment - Case Study
Beth Israel Hospital Case #2 Organizational Environment, p. 89-90.
B E T H I S R A E L H O S P I TA L
Boston ’ s Beth Israel Hospital is a restructuring effort in health care that
sought to move toward greater autonomy and teamwork. When Joyce
Clifford became Beth Israel ’ s director of nursing, she found a top - down
structure common in hospitals:
The nursing aides, who had the least preparation, had the most contact
with the patients. But they had no authority of any kind. They
had to go to their supervisor to ask if a patient could have an aspirin.
The supervisor would then ask the head nurse, who would then
ask a doctor. The doctor would ask how long the patient had been
in pain. Of course the head nurse had absolutely no idea, so she ’ d
have to track down the aide to ask her, and then relay that information
back to the doctor. It was ridiculous, a ludicrous and dissatisfying
situation, and one in which it was impossible for the nurse to
feel any satisfaction at all. The system was hierarchical, fragmented,
impersonal, and [overmanaged] [Helgesen, 1995, p. 134].
Within units, the responsibilities of nurses were highly specialized: some
assigned to handling medications, others to monitoring vital signs, still
others to taking blood pressure readings. Add to the list specialized
housekeeping roles — bedpan, bed making, and food services — and a
patient witnessed interruptions from a multitude of virtual strangers. No
one really knew for sure what was going on with any individual patient.
With the support and cooperation of Mitchell Rabkin, Beth Israel ’ s
progressive CEO, Clifford instituted a major structural change, from a
pyramid with nurses at the bottom to an inclusive web with nurses at
the center. The concept, called primary nursing, has each primary nurse
monitor the care of a specific patient. The nurse takes information
when the patient is admitted, develops a comprehensive plan, assembles
a team to provide round - the - clock care, and lets the family know
what to expect. A nurse manager sets goals for the unit, deals with
budget and administrative matters, and makes sure that primary nurses
have ample resources to provide quality care.
As the primary nurse assumed more responsibility, connections with
physicians and other hospital workers had to be revised. Instead of simply
carrying out physicians ’ orders, the primary nurse became a professional
partner, attending rounds and participating as an equal in treatment
decisions. Housekeepers reported to primary nurses rather than to housekeeping
supervisors. The same housekeeper was assigned to make a
patient ’ s bed, attend to the patient ’ s hygiene, and deliver trays. Laundry
workers brought in clean items on demand rather than making a once -
a - day delivery. Beth Israel ’ s inclusive web was further strengthened by
sophisticated technology that gave all network points easy access to
patient information and administrative data.
Primary nurses learned from performing a variety of heretofore
menial tasks. Bed making, for example, became an opportunity to
evaluate a patient ’ s condition and assess how well a treatment plan
was working. Joyce Clifford ’ s role also was transformed from top - down
supervisor to a web - centered coordinator. Rather than telling people
what to do, she focused on keeping everyone informed:
At the center of all patient care at Beth Israel, Joyce Clifford linked
the various intersecting points of the inclusive web: “ A big part
of my job is to keep nurses informed on a regular basis of what ’ s
going on out there — what the board is doing, what decisions are
confronting the hospital as a whole, what the issues are in health
care in this country. I also let them know that I ’ m trying to represent
what the nurses here are doing — to our vice - presidents, to our
board, and people in the outside world . . . to the nursing profession
and the health care field as a whole ” [Helgesen, 1995, p. 158].
Beth Israel ’ s primary nursing concept, initiated in the mid - 1970s, produced
significant improvement in both patient care and nursing morale. Nursing
turnover declined dramatically (Springarn, 1982) and the model ’ s success
made it highly influential and widely copied both in the United States and
abroad. But even successful change won ’ t work forever. Over the years,
changes in the health care system put Beth Israel ’ s model under increasing
pressure. More patients with more problems but shorter hospital stays
made nurses ’ jobs much harder at the same time that cost pressures forced
reductions in nursing staff. Beth Israel chose to update its approach by creating
interdisciplinary “ care teams. ” Instead of assembling an ad hoc collection
of care providers for each new patient, ongoing teams of nurses,
physicians, and support staff were created to provide interdisciplinary support
to primary nurses (Rundall, Starkweather, and Norrish, 1998).
2