Essay question due in 24 hours
Chapter 2
Claims
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 1
Claimsmakers attempt to persuade others that
something is a social problem.
What are some examples of this?
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 2
Rhetoric is the study of persuasion.
Constructing social problems is rhetorical.
Three fundamental components of
persuasive arguments:
Grounds
Warrants
Conclusions
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 3
Grounds: identifying the troubling condition
Grounds often follow a rhetorical recipe with
three ingredients.
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 4
1. Grounds often start with a typifying
example of the problem.
These stories do not always reflect
“typical” cases.
2. The problem is named and given an
orientation.
Type of medical condition, abuse, etc.
3. Statistics imply how bad the condition is.
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 5
More rhetorical devices used to establish
grounds:
Claiming that the problem is getting
progressively worse
Categorizing the problem as a recognizable
type, such as crime or disease
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 6
More rhetorical devices used to establish
grounds:
Painting the groups involved as either victims
or villains
Claiming that many different kinds of people
are hurt by the troubling condition
Challenging preexisting ways of constructing
the social problem
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 7
Warrants: explaining why people should care
A claim’s warrants justify doing something.
Claims utilize values.
Since different people have different values,
claimsmakers use multiple warrants to cover
the reasons why people might care.
Rhetoric of Claims Slide 8
Conclusions: what should be done
The proposed solutions must be in line with
the grounds and warrants.
Conclusions can include both short-term and
long-term goals and policy changes.
Claims and Audiences Slide 1
Valence issues:
Conditions that nearly everyone will agree are
significant social problems
Position issues:
Divisive, controversial topics
It is more difficult to find agreement, so
claimsmakers target sympathetic audiences.
Claims and Audiences Slide 2
Audiences for claims can be segmented.
Segmented audiences may have different interests and ideologies.
Certain demographic groups worry more about certain social problems than others.
Claims and Audiences Slide 3
Audiences are not passive.
They may seek out some claims and reject
others, picking and choosing social problems.
Successful claimsmakers pay attention to how
audiences respond to their claims.
Claims and Audiences Slide 4
Social problems marketplace
Audiences hear claims about many problems.
Claimsmakers struggle to get and keep the
attention of the audience.
Even if an issue is well-established,
claimsmakers need to keep refining claims.
They risk losing the attention of policymakers, the
media, and the general public.
Claims and Audiences Slide 5
How do claimsmakers refine claims?
Domain expansion: claimsmakers broaden
the definition of the problem, adding in more
victims to help and villains to confront.
Piggyback: claimsmakers can rely on
established problems and allow newer claims
to build upon older ones.
Claims and Audiences Slide 6
Most claims inspire counterclaims.
Counterclaims often involve disputes over
grounds or warrants.
“Stat wars” focus on which statistics are true.
Debates over ideologies are usually linked to
warrants.
Both sides modify claims as a response to
counterclaims.
Cultural Resources Slide 1
Claimsmakers can make any kind of claim.
However, their claims need to make sense to
the intended audiences.
Claimsmaking requires an understanding of
the cultural context in which claims are made.
Cultural Resources Slide 2
Claimsmakers tap into cultural resources, the
well of words, ideas, and images that most
people (of that culture) respond to.
Cultural Resources Slide 3
Culture is constantly changing.
Claimsmakers are not always consistent in
the cultural resources that they use.
They might frame the same issue in many
ways to appeal to a variety of audiences.
Cultural Resources Slide 4
Cultural resources both enrich and limit the
claimsmaking process.
They provide a broad range of words, images,
and ideas to use.
They constrain claimsmakers by making them
ground claims.