Fundamental informatic

profileGwadys
BenefitsGainedThroughUseofHighQualityData.docx

Benefits Gained Through Use of High Quality Data

AACSB Standards:  Technical Agility

In today’s world, data is being generated at massive speed. Companies are collecting vast amount of data and need to be able to analyze it quickly to make rapid decisions. To answer this enormous pool of data, some firms are using a new type of database called an in-memory database. In simple terms, this database stores its data in a computer’s memory rather than on disk. The result is very fast processing in real-time. For example, two companies are taking advantage of this database technology to stay ahead of their competition.

Under Armour, the sports clothing and fitness app provider, collects data from a variety of sources. For the clothing line, the management wants to run reports in real-time as sales occur to correctly distribute their product. With the new in-memory database system, Under Armour can run reports to allocate goods to various outlets in an hour. Before the new system, it took an overnight run to see this information. Former CIO and current VP Jody Giles said “It wasn’t just about being faster or running that job faster it is now I can run my business differently. I can optimize for revenue; I can optimize for fill rate. I can run different scenarios, opportunities we never had before”. (Vandervelde)

The company also owns fitness apps such as MapMyWalk and MapMyRun. From those mobile apps, Under Armour also collects a mind-boggling amount of data such as GPS and exercise parameters. Karthik Subramaniam, Under Armour’s data platform lead says that the goal with this data will be eventually to “predict human behavior.” (Campise 2017)

Another company using in-memory databases to collect and then analyze vast quantities of data is the Canadian company Cirque de Soleil. In 1984, two street performers found the performing company that can be described as a human circus. The shows involve performers that juggle, dance, play music and perform extreme movements. “The extravaganza includes colorful costumes, original music and magical lighting, all crafted by local experts and artisans. By 1990, digital technology – especially incredible light shows – were already par for the course. Cirque du Soleil had solidified itself as an international phenomenon.” (Foley 2019)

Cirque de Soleil has grown to a company that produces 40 shows in 60 countries with 11 million spectators. They have two main reasons for collecting and analyzing data.

Firstly, they track their performers during practice using cameras and motion-tracking devices. By collecting and analyzing this data, they can suggest improved training, improve injury avoidance, and identify those performers who could act as a replacement for someone who is injured or ill. Secondly, Cirque de Soleil is capturing audience reactions as the shows play to better understand what the audience enjoys during the show. “We’re prototyping real-time facial response to our shows as they’re happening. The surveys will never tell you that… Also, we have data scientists analyzing based on geographical locations [as] we believe [audience behavior] can differ from Asia to Europe, for instance. It’s the classic [need] to understand our audience better so we can do marketing with more precision and, hopefully, better conversion rates. We want to make data-driven decisions.” says Marc Gagnon, Cirque du Soleil’s director of innovation and enterprise architecture. (Yu 2019)

Critical Thinking Questions:

1. What sort of data can be collected from an app such as MapMyRun? How can that be related to Under Armour’s apparel division?

2. In Cirque du Soleil, what data beyond an audience’s facial expressions can be collected during a performance if the audience is allowed to use their mobile phones to participate in the show?

3. Discuss and debate the ethical use of the data that both Under Armour and Cirque du Soleil collect and analyze.

Sources: Vandervelde, Murphy. “In-memory databases: their rising popularity and Under Armour’s use of SAP Hana. Turbonomic.com. Accessed 7/3/2019 at https://blog.turbonomic.com/blog/on-technology/in-memory-databases-their-rising-popularity-and-under-armours-use-of-sap-hana; Yu, Eileen. 6/11/2019. “Cirque du Soleil Spotlights Visual Data to Better Understand Audience” DTCdaily.com. Accessed 7/3/2019 at https://www.dtcdaily.com/2019/06/cirque-du-soleil-spotlights-visual-data-to-better-understand-audience/; Campise, Kat. 8/17/2017. “How Under Armour manages IoT streaming data” rtinsights.com. Accessed 7/3/2019 at https://www.rtinsights.com/how-under-armour-manages-iot-streaming-data/; Foley, Dan. 3/20/2019. “Cirque du Soleil: at the intersection of technology and live entertainment” AZcentral.com. Accessed 7/3/2019 at  https://www.azcentral.com/story/sponsor-story/cirque-du-soleil/2019/03/20/cirque-du-soleil-intersection-technology-and-live-entertainment/3225527002/Links to an external site.

Submitting your Assignment

1. Click the  Submit Assignment button.

2. Click the  Choose File button and upload your file.

3. Click the  Submit Assignment button to submit.

Rubric

Writing Rubric Template

Writing Rubric Template

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

All required components of the assignment are complete or go beyond requirements. The focus on the assignment directly aligns with the prompt and is appropriately narrow for the scope of the assignment.

9 to >7.0 pts

Fully Meets Expectations

All required components of the assignment are complete. The focus on the assignment mostly aligns with the prompt, with some minor sidesteps. It may be narrow enough for the scope of the assignment, but at times is too broad or vague.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Some required components of the assignment are not complete. The focus on the assignment somewhat aligns with the prompt, with sidesteps. It is often too broad, hesitant to directly address the question, for the scope of the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Many of the required components of the assignment are not complete. The focus on the assignment hardly aligns or does not align with the prompt, with major sidesteps, and is too broad or vague, not directly addressing the question.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The work demonstrates that the student fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

9 to >7.0 pts

Fully Meets Expectations

The work demonstrates that the student, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

The work demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course, but is missing important connections or misunderstanding some aspects of the content.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work does not demonstrate that the student has understood and applied concepts learned in the course.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of main points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.

9 to >7.0 pts

Meets Expectations

For the most part, the work ties together information smoothly with an understanding of connections. Paper flows with only some disjointedness, but ultimately follows logical idea sequences and patterns.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work does not tie together the knowledge learned in the course. It does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships between ideas.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Exceptionally well- presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details.

9 to >7.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Well-presented and argued; ideas are mostly detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Main points are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.

4 to >0 pts

No Marks

Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions & Grammar

5 to >4.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

No spelling or grammar mistakes.

4 to >3.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Minor spelling & grammar mistakes that do not impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

3 to >2.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes that somewhat impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The mistakes severely impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting & Citations

5 to >4.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The work is formatted according to directions. It is professionally presented with clear organization. Outside sources are properly cited with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Meets Expectations

The work is mostly formatted according to directions. It is professionally presented with minor questions about organization. Outside sources are cited with minor errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

The work is somewhat formatted according to directions with obvious inconsistencies. It lacks a professional presentation or clear organization. There is an attempt to cite outside sources, but with many errors.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work is not formatted according to directions or lacks formatting altogether. It lacks a professional appearance. Outside sources are not cited or contain major errors or misleading information.

5 pts

Total Points: 50

Previous Next