hosp

Criteria

(Weight)

Professional (100%)

Thorough

(80%)

Not Fully Developed (50%)

Does Not Meet Requirements (0%)

Professional Format (30%)

Paper was properly formatted as specified in the case. Relevant data was incorporated from the data file in a professional and comprehensive fashion. Paper meets a professional standard.

Paper was generally well formatted, although not all specifications were met and/or data included was not properly formatted. Paper is approaching a professional standard.

Paper had significant formatting issues and/or was missing required information.

Paper had major formatting issues and/or none of the required specifications were met.

Consideration of the Case Facts (30%)

All relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision

Most relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision

Few relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision

Did not complete, or missing significant analytical points which were in the case data.

Decision Rationale (30%)

The decision rationale was well supported based on the facts in the case.

The decision rationale was partially supported based on the facts in the case.

The decision rationale was only barely supported based on the facts in the case.

No recommendations or incorrect, superficial and not measurable.

Format (10%)

Format to given standard, professional language used, no grammatical or spelling errors.

Format to given standard, professional language used, few grammatical or spelling errors.

Format not to given standard, unprofessional language used, grammatical or spelling errors.