Assignment 3-1

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 89.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

10.0 %Topic Introduction and Summary

The topic introduction and summary section of the paper is not offered.

The topic is not relevant and/or the explanation of research findings regarding customer perception on health care over the past 5 years, along with forecast of trends for the next 5 years, omits relevant material.

The topic is relevant and the explanation of research findings regarding customer perception on health care over the past 5 years, along with forecast of trends for the next 5 years, meets the minimum requirements of the assignment.

The topic is relevant and the explanation of research findings regarding customer perception on health care over the past 5 years, along with forecast of trends for the next 5 years, are offered in detail, enhancing the reader's understanding of the topic.

The topic is relevant and the explanation of research findings regarding customer perception on health care over the past 5 years, along with forecast of trends for the next 5 years, is concise and informative, enhancing the reader's understanding of the topic, while stimulating interest in the topic.

20.0 %Methodology

The methodology section of the paper is not offered.

An overview of the scope or the process for determining the validity and reliability of the data omits relevant information.

The paper's overview of the scope of the study in the chosen article, the explanation of the data collection process as well as the location of the data, and the process used to determine the validity and reliability of the research findings to support evidence-based practices meet the minimum requirements of the assignment.

The paper's overview of the scope of the study in the chosen article, the explanation of the data collection process as well as the location of the data, and the process used to determine the validity and reliability of the research findings to support evidence-based practices are described in detail, enhancing the reader's understanding.

The paper's overview of the scope of the study in the chosen article, the explanation of the data collection process as well as the location of the data, and the process used to determine the validity and reliability of the research findings to support evidence-based practices are accurate and described in detail, while demonstrating a higher level of understanding of the material, as indicated by personal insight.

20.0 %Results

The results section of the paper is not offered.

The paper's differentiation between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article and the evaluation of the information to determine the effectiveness of the study omit relevant information.

The paper's differentiation between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article and the evaluation of the information to determine the effectiveness of the study meet the minimum requirements of the assignment.

The paper's differentiation between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article and the evaluation of the information to determine the effectiveness of the study are offered in detail.

The paper's differentiation between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article and the evaluation of the information to determine the effectiveness of the study demonstrate a higher level of understanding of the material, as indicated by personal insight.

20.0 %Conclusion

The conclusion section of the paper is not offered.

The actions offered for meeting the future needs of health care omit relevant information.

The actions offered for meeting the future needs of health care meet the minimum requirements of the assignment.

The actions offered for meeting the future needs of health care are evidence-based and supported by rationale.

The actions offered for meeting the future needs of health care are creative, evidence-based, and supported by rationale.

25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format and Participation

2.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Format and Participation

3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage