BEL-HEALTH PROMOTION 2

• INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE • • Excellent The paper demonstrates that the author understands and

has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. All questions are answered thoroughly.
 
 25
 
 
 SatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.
 
 20
 
 
 UnsatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. There is a lack of development of questions.
 
 15
 
 
 UnacceptableThe paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. Cursory integration of knowledge and development of questions.
 
 10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TOPIC FOCUS
 
 Excellent The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this

assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.
 
 25
 
 
 SatisfactoryThe topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.
 
 20
 
 
 UnsatisfactoryThe topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
 
 15
 
 
 UnacceptableThe topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
 
 10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DEOTH OF DISCUSSION AND COHESIVENESS
 
 ExcellentIn-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.



 25
 
 
 SatisfactoryIn-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
 
 20
 
 
 UnsatisfactoryThe writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the submission, but not both.
 
 15
 
 
 UnacceptableCursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.
 
 10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


SOURCE AND REFERENCE COMPLETE WITH DOI#
 Excellent At least 6 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. All references complete without DOI number.
 
 8
 
 
 SatisfactoryUsed 5 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 1 reference incomplete without DOI number.
 
 6.4
 
 
 UnsatisfactoryUsed 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 2 references incomplete without DOI number.
 
 4.8
 
 
 UnacceptableFewer than 4 current sources are used which are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. More than 2 references incomplete without DOI number.
 
 3.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 APA ADHERENCE AND CITATION IN TEXT
 
 Excellent Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and

APA format errors. APA level headings incorporated throughout the submission.
 
 5
 
 
 SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/ or quotations, and APA format errors. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.
 
 4
 
 
 UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.
 
 3
 
 
 UnacceptableThe citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. No headings incorporated other than the title heading.
 
 2
 
 
 
 
 SPELLING AND GRAMMAR
 
 
 
 Excellent Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met. Similarity index and AI index 20% or lower.
 
 12
 
 


SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 25% or lower.
 
 9.6
 
 
 Unsatisfactory More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index 30% or lower.
 
 7.2
 
 
 UnacceptableAn unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count. Similarity index and AI index above 30%.
 
 4.8