Behavior Change
Behavior Change Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBaseline: Behavior, Beginnings, and Goals
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provided a clear operational definition of the behavior you wanted to change and your goal. Provided a detailed measure of where you began. Included at least one quantitative measurement that would be used to assess progress. Writing showed a strong understanding of operational definitions and measurement.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Provided a definition of the behavior you wanted to change and your goal. Provided a measure of where you began. Included at least one quantitative measurement that would be used to assess progress. The definition of the behavior may not have been operational or may have benefited from additional clarity or detail.
2.5 pts
Developing
Additional detail was needed in this section to show an understanding of the material. May have forgotten to include a definition of the behavior, your goal, or your baseline measure, or may have not included a quantitative measurement.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBaseline: Functional Analysis
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Paper included a functional analysis, including the A, B, and C. Functional analysis focused on the initial (unchanged) behavior at baseline. Thoughtfully discussed what you learned from the ABCs and showed a strong understanding of functional analysis.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Paper included a functional analysis, including the A, B, and C. There may have been minor errors in identifying the ABCs or the functional analysis may have focused on the goal behavior, rather than the initial behavior at baseline. Thoughtfully discussed what you learned from identifying the ABCs.
2.5 pts
Developing
There may have been several errors in identifying the ABCs or the functional analysis may have focused on the goal behavior, rather than the initial behavior at baseline. May have forgotten to discuss what you learned from identifying the ABCs or discussion would have benefited from much more depth or clarity.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation: Stages of Change
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Clearly and thoughtfully discussed the stages of change, including the initial stage you were in and any changes that occurred during the semester. Thoughtfully discussed how you used your stage of change to influence your interventions. Writing showed a strong understanding of the stages of change.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Discussed the stages of change, including the initial stage you were in, any changes that occurred during the semester, and how you used your stage of change to influence your interventions. Writing may have benefited from additional clarity or detail to show depth of understanding.
2.5 pts
Developing
Additional detail or clarity was needed to address this criterion. Discussed the stages of change, but may have been unclear in explaining any changes that occurred during the semester or how you used your stage of change to influence your interventions.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation: Interventions Used
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Clearly explained how you used at least three interventions from the course. Interventions were clearly discussed and writing showed a strong understanding of course material.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Explained how you used at least three interventions from the course. Discussion of how the interventions were utilized may have been vague or unclear at times. Writing may have benefited from additional clarity or detail to show depth of understanding.
2.5 pts
Developing
Additional detail or clarity was needed to address this criterion. Discussed interventions, but may have been unclear in explaining them or how they were used. May have chosen vague interventions and not provided enough detail to gauge depth of knowledge.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation: Problems/Challenges
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thoughtfully and clearly discussed problems and challenges that occurred when attempting the behavior change and how you addressed them. Showed a very high level of reflection and critical thinking.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Thoughtfully discussed problems and challenges that occurred when attempting the behavior change and how you addressed them. May have lacked detail or clarity at times but showed good evidence of analysis, reflection, and critical thinking.
2.5 pts
Developing
Briefly discussed problems and challenges that occurred when attempting the behavior change. May have been unclear how you thoughtfully addressed them. Writing would have benefited from additional clarity and reflection.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePost-Intervention: Outcome
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provided a clear operational definition of the outcome of the behavior change project and a thoughtful reflection about your level of success. Included at least one quantitative measurement to assess progress. Writing showed a strong understanding of operational definitions and measurement and a high level of reflection about the success, benefits, and losses.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Provided a definition of the outcome of the behavior change project and a reflection about your level of success. Included at least one quantitative measurement of your progress. Definition may have been unclear or not operational or the paper may have benefited from additional reflection about success, benefits, and losses.
2.5 pts
Developing
Discussed the outcome and your level of success. May have forgotten to include a quantitative outcome or only briefly discussed one's degree of success. May have forgotten to discuss benefits and losses related to the change.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePost-Intervention: Future Considerations
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thoughtfully discussed the future of the behavior, including ways to improve or maintain progress and what you would do differently next time. Showed a very high level of reflection and critical thinking.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Discussed the future of the behavior, including ways to improve or maintain progress and what you would do differently next time. Writing may have benefited from additional reflection and critical thinking.
2.5 pts
Developing
Discussed the future of the behavior, but may not have clearly discussed ways to improve or maintain progress and what you would do differently next time. Writing would have benefited from additional reflection and critical thinking.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePost-Intervention: Implications for Counseling
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thoughtfully discussed what you learned from the behavior change process and how you will take that knowledge into your clinical work. Showed a very high level of reflection and critical thinking.
4 pts
Meets Expectations
Discussed what you learned from the behavior change process and how you will take that knowledge into your clinical work. Writing may have benefited from additional reflection and critical thinking to show depth of insight.
2.5 pts
Developing
Discussed what you learned from the behavior change process and how you will take that knowledge into your clinical work. May have only briefly discussed this section or may have been vague. Writing would have benefited from additional reflection and critical thinking to show depth of insight.
0 pts
Missing
Requirement was not addressed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
APA style was correctly used throughout the paper. This includes the general formatting rules, title page, citations, headings, references, etc. Each time course material was used, it was cited. May have had 1-2 very minor errors (e.g. missing a period or comma).
4 pts
Meets Expectations
APA style was correctly used throughout most of the paper. This includes the general formatting rules, title page, citations, headings, references, etc. Each time course material was used, it was correctly cited. May have had 3+ minor errors (e.g. missing italics in a reference, incorrectly formatted heading in one area).
2.5 pts
Developing
APA style was used throughout the paper. There were significant errors such as using incorrect headings, not citing the course material/lecture each time course material was used, or several errors in the references section.
0 pts
Missing
Paper was not formatted in APA style.
5 pts
Total Points: 45