Analysis of Case study " “Alex Springer: Strategic Leadership of the Digital Media Transformation"

Summative Assessment 1

Presentation BCO 221 – Global Economics Online campus

Professor: Dr. Neus Vila | [email protected]

Description Share the link of a recorded presentation of maximum 10 minutes on the following topic:

Explain the pros and cons of the government of a county of your choice, using the following trade barriers:

1. Tariffs

2. Subsidies

3. Quotas

Justify your answer for each trade barrier with actual data and evidence for specific industries.

Format This activity must meet the following formatting requirements:

• 10 minutes Maximum presentation

• PowerPoint presentation being shown in the recording together with your face or torso while you present

• The power point has to be visually appealing, with just the key sentences or words.

• The presenter cannot read the slides or a document. Has to present in an engaging manner.

• The is piece of work that you must complete individually, it is not a team exercise

• Harvard Referencing System must be used with a referencing section being required in last slide of the PowerPoint presentation

• Submit the link of the recording in the Assessment section in week 7 on the Moodle page of this course

Goal(s) Understand the rationale behind several protection mechanisms used in your country

Due date Date: Tuesday, 16 March 2021

Time: 23:59

Weight towards final grade

This activity has a weight of 40% towards the final grade.

Learning outcomes

• develop a complex understanding of the main concepts of international economics and how to apply them

Assessment criteria

The assessment criteria is based on the below rubric

Rubric: presentation

Criteria Accomplished (A) Proficient (B) Partially proficient (C) Borderline (D) Fail (F)

Visuals Professionally designed. Attractive, relevant and add to understanding. Support the development of the presentation.

Professionally designed but there are too many (some irrelevant) or are missing. Support the development of the presentation.

Visuals are well designed. Generally, they support the argument, but some are irrelevant or unclear.

Visuals are mundane and not always relevant to the presentation development. Fewer than five spelling mistakes.

Visuals are poorly designed, containing only words and are used as notes. More than five spelling mistakes. Relevance is not clear.

Content The content is clear, well developed and interesting. Conclusions are clearly justified. Appropriate language style and shows thorough, in- depth understanding of the subject area.

Competent development of content showing in-depth knowledge of subject area.

The content is clear showing knowledge of the area. Improvements would help to justify conclusions.

The content is generally clear but there are gaps in the development or information which is not relevant is given too much importance.

The content is a simple repetition of written work with no amendments to language or style. The development is confusing and does not justify the conclusions.

Questions and answers

The candidate showed in-depth knowledge, was well prepared for the questions and expanded answers in-depth showing ownership of the subject area.

The candidate was well prepared to answer questions and showed in-depth knowledge of the subject area. Expanded on answers.

The candidate was able to answer the questions but did not expand on question areas.

The candidate attempted to answer the questions but not always appropriately.

The candidate was unprepared and unable to answer pertinent questions.