leadership report
Rust99
BBA322LeadershipTeambuilding-TBRforFinalProject4.docxBBA322 LEADERSHIP & TEAMBULDING – Task brief & rubrics
ACADEMIC ESSAY
Description:
· You have to write an academic essay to critically assess Leadership & Teambuilding in a globalized world.
· In your essay, answer the following question: How can we address Leadership & Teambuilding in a multi-cultural atmosphere?
· Many literacy exists on this topic. You may find it and use it for your arguments.
· You may serve from the different authors, models and theories reviewed in class. You may as well find and analyze a case study dealing with cross-cultural leadership and teambuilding topics. Either way, the outcome must reflect academic insights at all time.
· You must show critical thinking engagement in your essay, analyzing and evaluating the different topics that you talk about.
· This is an academic essay, so make sure to quote relevant publications, such as academic journals and books, to support your arguments. In order to find relevant publications, you may browse through EBSCO (link is on Moodle) and/or Google Scholar, where you’ll find access to many academic publications.
Formalities:
· Wordcount: From 2500 to 3500 words.
· Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
· Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
· Text alignment: Justified.
· The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Assignment Launch: Week 11
Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Deadline is on the same day of your class, by 23:59hrs.
Weight: This task is a 60% of your total grade for this subject.
Outcomes: This task assesses the following learning outcomes:
· Critically understand the importance of the relationship between effective leadership and successful teams.
Rubrics
|
|
Exceptional 90-100 |
Good 80-89 |
Fair 70-79 |
Marginal fail 60-69 |
|
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) |
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. |
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. |
|
Application (30%) |
Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. |
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident. |
|
Critical Thinking (30%) |
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. |
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. |
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. |
Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources. |
|
Communication (20%) |
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities. |
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities. |
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the time limit. Some formalities are missing. |
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit and formalities are not respected. |
