CHANGE MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT
BBA313 CHANGE MANAGEMENT Case Study brief & rubrics
Task
Individual document assignment.
Read the following case and prepare a critical analysis. You should:
• Identify skills and personal profile of each of the four department members.
• Evaluate how leadership styles can be adapted in response to the different circumstances.
• Examine the required influence and negotiation strategies to help Jill reach the organization's goals.
o Offer at least one recommendation for each person on the team.
Formalities:
• Wordcount: maximum of 2,000
• Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
• Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
• Text alignment: Justified.
• The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Submission: Week 3 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Sunday 17/10/2021 23:59 CEST
Weight: This task is a 30% of your total grade for this subject.
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
• Outcome 1: understand and apply the competencies and behaviors of an effective change agent
• Outcome 2: formulate and discuss a personal change management theory that is productive and positive
Rubrics
Exceptional Good Fair Marginal Fail 100-90 89-80 79-70 69-60 <60
Summary Word limit criteria met. Writing style is consistent and clear.
Word limit criteria +/- 5%. Writing style is consistent and mainly clear.
Word limit criteria +/- 10%. Writing style is inconsistent and/or sometimes unclear.
Word limit criteria +/- 15%. Writing style is inconsistent and/or mainly unclear.
Word limit criteria exceeds +/-20%. Writing style is inconsistent and mainly unclear.
10%
Relevance
Student selects all key concepts, demonstrating a superior understanding of the reading material and task.
Student selects some key concepts, demonstrating a good understanding of the reading material and task.
Student selects a few key concepts, demonstrating a fair understanding of the reading material and task. Some concepts might be missing or are too generic.
Student selects little key concepts, demonstrating a poor understanding of the reading material and task. Most concepts might be missing and/or are too generic.
Student selects none of the key concepts, demonstrating insufficient understanding of the reading material and task. All concepts might be missing and are too generic.
25%
Analysis & Evaluation Provides excellent
evaluations of each profile. Adds to the proposed topics of discussion.
Provides clear evaluations of question's weaknesses and strengths. Adds to the proposed topics of discussion.
Provides some evaluations of question's weaknesses and strengths. Limited to the proposed topics of discussion or does not cover all but adds other.
Provides poor evaluations of question's weaknesses and strengths. Does not cover all proposed topics of discussion and/or does not add other.
Provides no evaluations of question's weaknesses and strengths. Does not cover all proposed topics of discussion and does not add other.
25%
Conclusion Communicates points across and draws a clear conclusion to the question.
Communicates some of the points across and draws a partial conclusion to the question.
Communicates some of the points across but does not draw a conclusion to the question, or vice versa.
Does not communicate the points across and/or does not draw a conclusion to the question.
Does not communicate the points across and does not draw a conclusion to the question.
15%
Originality Exhibits breakthrough and unique ideas, not discussed in class and not seen in existing literature. Shows creativity and own opinions.
Exhibits some unique ideas, not discussed in class but seen in existing literature. Shows creativity and own opinions.
Exhibits some unique ideas, but most discussed in class and/or seen in existing literature. Shows little creativity and/or no own opinions.
Exhibits at least one unique idea, the rest discussed in class and/or seen in existing literature. Shows little creativity and/or no own opinions.
Exhibits no unique ideas, all discussed in class and/or seen in existing literature. Shows no creativity and no own opinions.
25%