Project management case study
amado7
BBA222ProjectManagement-ResitAssignment.docx
BBA222 PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Resit Assignment Task brief & rubrics
GRADUATION CEREMONY 2021 PROJECT
Description:
· You have to create your proposal on
Option 1) EU business school student gym;
Option 2) EU business school student residence.
· In your proposal you have to use all material discussed in class to assess the future role of professional Project Manager.
· You must show engagement with the topics learned in class, in particular: formulate the proposal, prepare matrix responsibilities, create WBS & RBS, make estimations of time duration demonstrable in AON, make resources and budget proposals, identify sensitive activities/risks, prepare risk matrix, demonstrate your project on Gantt chart.
· You should make references to real names/people/places, etc. to elaborate your work.
· You are not limited to any budget but try to obtain real numbers from real suppliers (if not possible, estimations are accepted).
· You may quote relevant publications, such as academic journals and books, to support your arguments of conclusions.
Formalities:
· Wordcount: From 1500 to 2500 words.
· Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
· Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
· Text alignment: Justified.
· The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Outcomes: This task assesses the following learning outcomes:
· Describe the need for a project-based approach inside organizations.
· Understand the role of project management as a strategic element inside organizations.
· Critically assess the roles and responsibilities of a Project Manager.
· Evaluate how to select, develop, plan schedule and measure its outcomes and risks.
Submission: SUNDAY 11th APRIL 2021, 23:59HRS ON MOODLE
Weight: Resit – worth 100% of the overall grade – Please remember resits are capped at 70%
Rubrics
|
|
Exceptional 90-100 |
Good 80-89 |
Fair 70-79 |
Marginal fail 60-69 |
|
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) |
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. |
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. |
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. |
|
Application (30%) |
Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. |
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. |
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident. |
|
Critical Thinking (30%) |
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. |
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. |
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. |
Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources. |
|
Communication (20%) |
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities. |
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities. |
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the time limit. Some formalities are missing. |
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit and formalities are not respected. |
