military history

profileJordanjameire
BattleAnalysisExamplePPT.pptx

)

Pointe Du Hoc, June 6, 1944 Battle Analysis

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Agenda

Step 1: Define the Subject.

Step 2: Review the Setting.

Step 3: Describe the Action.

Step 4: Assess the Significance.

2

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 1: Define the Subject

World War II, Normandy, France

Operation Overlord (encompassed the entirety of the European invasion)

Operation Neptune (the amphibious beach landings at Normandy) 50-mile length of coastline on Hitler’s Atlantic Wall

Utah, Omaha, Gold Juno, and Sword beaches

Omaha Beach

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

D-Day Invasion, Point Du Hoc

Omaha Beach, Normandy France

US, Great Britain, Canada

2nd Ranger Battalion

June 6, 1944

Research material

Omaha Beachhead.

Small Unit Actions. 

James Rudder, After-Battle-Report, Point Du Hoc.  

Christopher Klein, The Weather Forecast That Saved D-Day.

Michael Frederick, D-Day: Interview with Two U.S. 2nd Ranger Battalion Members Who Describe the Attack at Point-du-Hoc.

David Hogan, U.S. Army Special Operations in World War II.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 2: Review the Setting

Strategic/Operational Overview

Identify the War

Objective of principle Antagonists

Campaign Overview

Study Area of Operations

Weather

Terrain/OAKOC

Compare Antagonists/Belligerents

Size & composition

Technology

Doctrine & Training

Logistics

C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance)

Condition & Morale

Leadership

State Mission, Objective & Initial Disposition of Opposing Forces

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Strategic/Operational Overview

Identify the War

D Day Invasion, Point Du Hoc, Omaha Beach, Normandy, France 06 June 1944

Mission

Allies: Secure the beachhead along the Normandy coastline in order for follow on forces.

2nd Ranger Battalion: Remove the threat of the 155mm howitzer (6) in the vicinity of Point Du Hoc that were directed on to Omaha Beach.

Germans: Defend the Atlantic coastline wall against allied invasion force

Campaign Overview

There were over 50 operations in support of (ISO) the D-Day Invasion.

Operation Overlord: Pointblank (allied bombing campaign) Neptune, Torch, Bodyguard (deception plan) Fortitude (beach landing specic), Jedburgh.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Area of Operations - WX & Terrain

Poor weather and rain prior to 6 June was responsible for rough seas and beach landing.

A storm front delayed the planned invasion on the 5th of June. The brief break in weather, allowed the allies to continue with the invasion, much to the surprise of the Germans, who did not expect the attack given the poor weather.

On the 6th the weather was in the 50’s with the water temperature in the high 40’s.

The rough seas were partially to blame for wet gear once on the beach.

The ropes that were brought for climbing the cliffs at the pointe were wet, making it much more difficult to ascend.

Many of the rockets used to “shoot” the ropes over the top of the cliffs failed due to the extra weight of the wet ropes.

The cliffs were muddy and contained a lot of clay, making it difficult to climb, as the ropes became muddy as well.

The biggest advantage that the weather provided was the unexpectedness of the attack for the allies.

OAKOC

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Compare Antagonists/Belligerents

Compare Antagonists/Belligerents

Size & composition

Technology

Doctrine & Training

Logistics

C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance)

Condition & Morale

Leadership

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Ranger

Size & composition: 3 companies of (D, E, and F), of 190 men.

Technology: BAR, Rocket Launcher

Doctrine & Training: Pre-Mission Training in Scotland; cliff climbing, amphibious assault tactics, and physical training.

Logistics: Well supplied

C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance): encrypted radio communications

Condition & Morale: High

Leadership: LTC Rudder

Germany

Size & composition: 125 infantry troops and 85 artillerymen of the 716th Infantry Division

Technology: small arms, hand grenades

Doctrine & Training: less trained and prepared. The more experienced and capable units were fighting in the Eastern Front against Russia.

Logistics: Limited

C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance): encrypted radio communications

Condition & Morale: Low

Leadership

Compare Antagonists/Belligerents

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Mission, Objective & Initial Disposition of Opposing Forces

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 3: Describe the Action

1630 on 05 June, departed Britain for France.

0300 on 6 June, they reached the transport area.

0445 began movement on the DUKW to beach landing site (BLS).

0630 H-Hour (synchronized landings) for Operation Neptune

0705 2nd Ranger BN landed (delayed 35 minutes/navigational error)

the Rangers moved 30 yards to the base of the cliffs under German sniper and machine gun fire, along with a “constant rain of grenades”, where a temporary command post (CP) was established.

0715 Rangers reach the top of the cliffs. 10 minutes after landing.

The allied bombing had effectively destroyed 1 x anti-aircraft gun, 3 x 155mm emplacements and 1of the six 155mm howitzers.

By 1200, they had received at least 7 killed, and 24 wounded. Accountability of only 70 men.

After reorganizing, the Rangers continued mission of finding and destroying the remaining five 155mm’s. The remaining five were discovered a short distance away and destroyed.

D+1, the 2nd Ranger Battalion had been reinforced with the other Ranger elements.

D+2, the Rangers had completed their mission and were relieved.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 4: Assess the Significance

Q: Cause and Effect: Why did events turn out the way they did?

A: Planning, Training, and Execution.

Q: Relevance: What is relevant about this study to current operations?

A: A lesson in Planning, Training, and Execution. The destruction of the 6 x 155 howitzers eased the burden and death toll on

Q: Who won? Who lost?:

A: The Allies quickly won Caen and St Mere Eglise from the Germans and destroyed their Atlantic Wall defensive plan. The Germans would surrender to the Allies in less than a year. The immediate removal of the 155’s eased the burden and loss of life on Omaha Beach, where

Q: What were the constants that affected the outcome?

A: Planning, leadership, speed, and the allied bombing campaign.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 4: Assess the Significance

Principles of War

Objective. Offensive. Maneuver. Mass. Economy of Force. Unity of Command. Security. Surprise. Simplicity.

Warfighting Functions

Mission Command. Movement and Maneuver. Intelligence. Fires. Sustainment. Protection.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Step 4: Assess the Significance: Threads Of Continuity

Internal Threads

Military Professionalism

Tactics

Operations

Strategy

Logistics and Administration

Military Theory and Doctrine

Military Leadership

External Threads

Military Professionalism

Tactics

Operations

Strategy

Logistics and Administration

Military Theory and Doctrine

Military Leadership

Political Factors

Social Factors

Economic Factors

Technology

Military Geography

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

Closing

Review Learning Objectives:

Questions

Book selection due for review and approval

Next Lesson:

The Formative Years, 1783-1812

Cadet Post-Class Assignment

Chapter 5, “The Formative Years, 1783-1812” in American Military History Volume I, pp. 107-129.

Revision Date: Nov2017

MH303 Battle Analysis Lesson

image2.jpeg

image3.jpeg

image4.jpg

image5.png

image6.png

image7.JPG

image8.png

image9.png

image10.jpeg

image11.png

image12.png

image1.png