mg week 7
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Chapter 10
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Mission
Objectives
External
Analysis
Internal
Analysis
Strategic
Choice
Strategy
Implementation
Competitive
Advantage
The Strategic Management Process
Corporate Level
Strategy
Which Businesses
to Enter?
• Vertical Integration
• Diversification
• Strategic Alliances
Mode of Entry?
• Mergers &
Acquisitions
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Logic of Corporate Level Strategy Applies
Corporate level strategy should create value:
2) such that businesses forming the corporate whole
are worth more than they would be under
independent ownership
3) that equity holders cannot create through
portfolio investing
1) such that the value of the corporate whole increases
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Mergers & Acquisitions Defined
• two firms are combined on
a relatively co-equal basis
• one firm buys another
firm
• the words are often used interchangeably even
though they mean something very different
• merger sounds more amicable, less threatening
Mergers
Acquisitions
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
• parent stocks are usually
retired and new stock issued
• name may be one of the
parents’ or a combination
• can be a controlling
share, a majority, or
all of the target firm’s
stock
• can be friendly or
hostile
Mergers & Acquisitions Defined
• usually done through
a tender offer
• one of the parents usually
emerges as the dominant
management
Mergers
Acquisitions
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Value?
The Logic
Unrelated M&A Activity
• there would be no expectation of value creation
due to the lack of synergies between businesses
• there might be value creation due to efficiencies
from an internal capital market
• there might be value creation due to the exploitation
of a conglomerate discount
• a corporate raider who buys and restructures firms
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Mergers & Acquisitions Defined
Types of M&A Activity
Vertical
Horizontal
Product Extension
Market Extension
Conglomerate
» suppliers or customers
» competitors
» complementary products
» complementary markets
» everything else
Related
Unrelated
FTC
Categories
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Value?
The Logic
Related M&A Activity
• value creation would be expected due to
synergies between divisions
• economies of scale
• economies of scope
• transferring competencies
• sharing infrastructure, etc.
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Value?
The Empirical Evidence
• this reflects the market’s assessment of the
expected value of the merger or acquisition
• these studies look at what happens to the price
of both the acquirer’s stock and the target’s stock
• thus, we can see who is capturing any expected
value that may be created
Research is based on stock market reaction to the
announcement of M&A activity
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Value?
The Empirical Evidence
Acquiring
Firms
Target
Firms
M&A Activity creates value, on average, as follows:
• related M&A activity creates more value than
unrelated M&A activity
M&A activity creates value, but target firms capture it
• no value created
• value increases by
about 25%
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Value?
Expected versus Operational Value
Wells Fargo: down $0.25 to $39.50
First Security: up $1.19 to $13.38
Stock Price Market Cap.
12/1999 $40.44 $65.7 B
12/2000 $56.69 $95.2 B
12/2001 $43.60 $74.0 B
12/2002 $46.87 $82.0 B
12/2003 $58.89 $100.0 B
12/2004 $62.15 $105.0 B
April 2000: Wells Fargo offers to acquire First Security Bank
for about $3 billion
Stock values were:
Wells Fargo: $43.69
First Security: $15.50
The Deal:
.355 shares of WF for each
share of FS stock
Expected
Operational
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Why is M&A Activity So Prevalent?
If managers know that acquiring firms do not
capture any value from M&A’s, why do they
continue to merge and acquire?
• cash generating, normal return investment
• avoid competitive disadvantage
• avoid scale disadvantages
Survival
Free Cash
Flow
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Why is M&A Activity So Prevalent?
If managers know that acquiring firms do not
capture any value from M&A’s, why do they
continue to merge and acquire?
• managers benefit from increases in size
• managers benefit from diversification
• managers believe they can beat the odds
Agency
Problems
Managerial
Hubris
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Why is M&A Activity So Prevalent?
If managers know that acquiring firms do not
capture any value from M&A’s, why do they
continue to merge and acquire?
• proposed M&A activity may satisfy
the logic of corporate level strategy
• managers may see economies that
the market can’t see
• some M&A activity does generate
above normal profits (expected and
operational over the long run)
Above Normal
Profits
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Can an M&A strategy generate sustained
competitive advantage?
Yes, if managers’ abilities meet VRIO criteria
2
Managers may be good at doing ‘deals’
1
Managers may be good at recognizing & exploiting
potentially value-creating economies with other firms
3
Managers may be good at both
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Recognizing and Exploiting Economies of Scope
$10,000
$12,000
• Firm C’s recognized
value is $10,000
• Firm A can earn a
profit of $2,000
only if the economy
remains private
Bidders
Target
• Firm A sees value
of $12,000 in Firm C
Private Economies
Firm A
Firm B
Firm C
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Recognizing and Exploiting Economies of Scope
$10,000
$12,000
Bidders
Target
• if the economy
between A & C
is costly to imitate,
it doesn’t matter
if other firms know
• Firm A can still earn
a $2,000 profit
Costly-to-Imitate
Economies
Firm A
Firm B
Firm C
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Recognizing and Exploiting Economies of Scope
$10,000
$10,000
Bidders
Target
• Firm C has a market
value of $10,000
• Firm A buys Firm C
for $10,000
• Firm C turns out to be
worth $12,000
$12,000
Firm A
Firm B
Firm C
Unexpected
Economies
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Doing the Deal
Bidding Firm’s
Perspective
Search for
Rare Economies
Limit Information
to Other Bidders
Limit Information
to the Target
Avoid Bidding
Wars
Close the
Deal Quickly
Seek Thinly
Traded Markets
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Competitive Advantage
Doing the Deal
Target Firm’s
Perspective
Seek Information
from Bidders
Invite Other Bidders to
Join in Bidding Contest
Delay, But Do Not
Stop the Acquisition
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Implementation Issues
Structure, Control, and Compensation
• m-form structure is typically used
• management controls & compensation policies
are similar to those used in diversification strategies
• target firm may remain somewhat autonomous
• target firm may be completely integrated
M&A activity requires responses to these issues:
Managers must decide on the level of integration:
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Implementation Issues
Cultural Differences
• combining elements of both cultures
• essentially replacing one culture with the other
• high levels of integration require greater cultural
blending
• cultural blending may be a matter of:
• integration may be very costly, often unanticipated
• the ability to integrate efficiently may be a source
of competitive advantage
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
Summary
M&A activity is a mode of entry for vertical
integration and diversification strategies
M&A activity can create economic value at
announcement, but target firms usually capture
that value
A firm’s M&A strategy should satisfy the
logic of corporate level strategy
M&A activity can create value over the long term
for the acquiring firm
*
Mergers & Acquisitions
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly
*
Mergers and Acquisitions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-*
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall