HLSS502Wk7
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING YOUR WORLD NEWSLETTERS PRESS DONATE MY ACCOUNT CONTACTED BY US?
Read our research on: World Leaders | Artificial Intelligence | Affirmative Action
Search pewresearch.org...
RESEARCH TOPICS ALL PUBLICATIONS METHODS SHORT READS TOOLS & RESOURCES EXPERTS ABOUT
Home Research Topics Politics & Policy Leaders More Leaders George W. Bush
JUNE 7, 2013
Balancing Act: National Security and Civil Liberties in Post-9/11 Era BY CARROLL DOHERTY
The revelations that Obama administration secretly collected phone records and accessed the internet activity of millions of Americans have raised new questions about the public’s
willingness to sacrifice civil liberties in the interests of national security. Since 9/11, Americans generally have valued protection from terrorism over civil liberties, yet they
also have expressed concerns over government overreach and intrusions on their personal
privacy.
Security First. Since shortly after 9/11, Pew Research has asked whether people’s greater
concern is that anti-terror policies will go too far in restricting civil liberties, or that they won’t go far enough in adequately protecting the country. The balance of opinion has
consistently favored protection. Most recently, in 2010, 47% said they were more
concerned that government policies “have not gone far enough to adequately protect the country,” while 32% said they were more concerned that “they have gone too far in
restricting the average person’s civil liberties.”
But Fewer See Need to Sacrifice Civil Liberties. Yet fewer Americans think it will be
necessary to sacrifice civil liberties to combat terrorism than did so shortly after the 9/11
attacks. In a poll conducted in 2011, shortly before the 10th anniversary of 9/11, 40% said that “in order to curb terrorism in this country it will be necessary for the average person
to give up some civil liberties,” while 54% said it would not. A decade earlier, in the
aftermath of 9/11 and before the passage of the Patriot Act, opinion was nearly the reverse (55% necessary, 35% not necessary).
Track Terrorists – Not Me. The public has never liked the idea of the government monitoring their personal phone calls or emails. In the 9/11 anniversary survey, just 29%
favored “the U.S. government monitoring personal telephone calls and emails” in order to
curb terrorism. It drew less support than the other anti-terror tactics asked about in the survey.
Bush’s Domestic Surveillance Program. In late 2005, news that President George W. Bush authorized the National Security Agency to monitor phone calls and emails –
without court permission – stirred intense civil liberties concerns, especially among
Democrats. From early 2006 through early 2009, public support for the program ranged from 48% to 54%. The question asked if it was generally right or wrong “for the
government to monitor telephone and e-mail communications of Americans suspected of having terrorist ties without first obtaining permission from the courts.” There were
consistently wide partisan differences on views of this program: in February 2008, nearly
twice as many Republicans (74%) as Democrats (39%) favored the phone and email
monitoring.
Privacy Concerns: It’s Not Just Government
What is often overlooked in the debate over government surveillance of private
communications is the widespread public concern over the amount of personal information businesses are collecting. In our 2012 political values survey, 64% said they
were concerned that “the government is collecting too much information about people like
me.” Yet 74% expressed this concern about business corporations.
Concern that business corporations are collecting too much personal information crosses
party lines. In addition, Republicans have become much more concerned about possible privacy intrusions by the government than they were during Bush’s presidency (72% in
2012, 39% in 2007).
Topics George W. Bush, Defense & National Security, Terrorism, Privacy Rights, Online Privacy & Security
Carroll Doherty is director of political research at Pew Research Center. POSTS BIO TWITTER EMAIL
SHARE THIS LINK: http://pewrsr.ch/19PkS1L
Sign up for our weekly newsletter Fresh data delivered Saturday mornings
Enter email address... SIGN UP
RELATED
FACT SHEET | APR 29, 2021
Bhutanese in the U.S. Fact Sheet
FACT SHEET | NOV 20, 2017
Facts on Foreign Students in the U.S.
FEATURE | JAN 10, 2017
How America Changed During Barack Obama’s Presidency
SHORT READ | JUL 16, 2014
Obama viewed as more caring than Bush, but no more effective
SHORT READ | DEC 19, 2013
Obama, Bush and the ‘second-term curse’
TOPICS
Online Privacy & Security
Terrorism
Defense & National Security
George W. Bush
Privacy Rights
MOST POPULAR
Large Shares See Russia and Putin in Negative Light, While Views of Zelenskyy More Mixed
Majority of Americans say TikTok is a threat to national security
5 facts about the QAnon conspiracy theories
A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married
1
2
3
4
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Copyright 2023 Pew Research Center About Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy Feedback
Careers
How U.S. adults on Twitter use the site in the Elon Musk era5
1615 L St. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
USA
(+1) 202-419-4300 | Main
(+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax
(+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
RESEARCH TOPICS
Politics & Policy
International Affairs
Immigration & Migration
Race & Ethnicity
Religion
Age & Generations
Gender & LGBTQ
Family & Relationships
Economy & Work
Science
Internet & Technology
News Habits & Media
Methodological Research
Full topic list
FOLLOW US
Email Newsletters
YouTube
RSS