2.2 Multigenerational Background & Significance Paper
Running head: MULTIGENERATIONAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 1
Multigenerational Background and Significance Report Example
Jane Doe
Trevecca Nazarene University
MOL 5800: Special Topics in Organizational Leadership
Dr. David Lomascolo
(Date)
MULTIGENERATIONAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 2
Multigenerational Background and Significance Report Example
Training is an important component of employee development and engagement.
According to Ali, Bashir, and Mehreen (2019), employee engagement through training is not just
a benevolent benefit that an organization can offer to attract high quality candidates, but in turn
employee development strengthens organizational effectiveness, and “organizations should
provide training and development practices to their employees which retain the skilled
employees and generate competitive advantage” (p.75). However, knowing that the current
economic landscape typically encompasses four different generations (Hut, 2020), including
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964), Generation X (born generally between 1965- early 1980s),
Millennials (early 1980s-late 1990s), and the emerging Generation Z (typically born late 1990s-
mid 2010s), and even can include Traditionalists (born before 1945), there is a wide range of
attitudes and preferences for specific training topics and methods of delivery. The larger the
organization, the more likely that the prevalence of generational diversity will draw attention to
these generational differences, and will need to be an important consideration for the efficacy of
training programs.
Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) is a Nashville-based business of over 2,000 team
members focused on hospitality and entertainment, as well as food and beverage, particularly
within the tourism industry. Classified as a REIT (real estate investment trust) for tax purposes,
RHP operates with two distinct divisions of the business (‘About Us,’ 2020). One focuses on the
asset management of the five large convention-style hotels across the nation; while RHP owns
the physical property and assets of these hotels, Marriott International runs the daily operations.
The other segment encompasses both the management and daily operations of its entertainment
venues. In the last three years, the company has expanded from its longstanding legacy music
venues, primarily the Grand Ole Opry and Ryman Auditorium, into the restaurant industry. In
MULTIGENERATIONAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 3
partnership with Blake Shelton, RHP owns and operates Ole Red, the Honky Tonk-style casual
southern restaurant brand that includes multiple stages at each location to marry the dining
experience with live entertainment, spotlighting new artists at the beginning of their journey to
the Grand Ole Opry and Ryman stages. Ole Red includes locations in Nashville, TN;
Tishomingo, OK; Gatlinburg, TN; and the newest location scheduled to open spring 2020 in
Orlando, FL. With the depth and breadth of the organization’s businesses, as well as the size of
the company, there is representation of all five generations, as well as a variety of career tenures.
The business includes examples of traditionalist staff who have built a 50-year career with the
company, as well as Generation Z employees beginning their first jobs as hourly front-line
associates in the newly opened restaurants and the music venues.
In my experience as HR Training Specialist, I have witnessed both the desire of team
members across generations for training that will increase their relevancy in the workforce, and
the difficulty of finding a one-size-fits-all approach to skill building, which Shaw (2013) referred
to as the dual nature of training as a multigenerational sticking point. Noting that RHP has failed
to recruit top candidates for high level leadership positions while also experiencing higher than
industry average turnover, it is worth considering the effect that training (or lack thereof) has had
on these corporate challenges. Objectively, it seems training and development is currently an
extremely low priority within the organization when observing a training budget of less than
$100,000 for a company that had an entertainment income of over $183 million for the fiscal
year 2019 (Ryman Hospitality Properties, 2020). According to the Association for Talent and
Development, the average expenditure per employee on training among companies nationally in
2018 was $1,299 (Ho, 2019); by contrast, RHP’s learning expenditure per employee was $50.
This number plummets when taking into account that half the training budget was earmarked for
a learning initiative focused on a group of 123 executive and managerial leaders.
MULTIGENERATIONAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 4
The goal of this study is to observe the different generational beliefs within RHP
regarding training, and to better understand how these differences impact the effectiveness of a
variety of methods of training on performance and retention. Ideally, in understanding these
different foundational beliefs through this case study, there is opportunity to uncover insights
regarding which training methods are most advantageous for comparatively sized companies,
providing clarity on development topics, delivery methods, and how to maximize the return on
investment from these programs both in terms of employee engagement and retention. There
may be complications to the study in encouraging individuals to provide truthful and relevant
feedback if they worry about organizational retaliation for their honesty, as well as in their own
self-awareness of the difference between their espoused preferences and their actual preferences
in practice. In addition, there could be problems in separating out an individual’s preferences and
attributing them to one’s generation and not their age range, personality, experience within their
specific venue, or other external factors that could cloud their short-term responses as long-term
attitudes.
I believe even a small increase in the expenditures and focus on effective training can
yield an extraordinary return on investment for the organization, provided the training takes into
account learner needs and preferences. By understanding the most effective training methods for
an intergenerational workplace, it becomes easier to make the argument for increased investment
in specific training initiatives, and to begin to build metrics that measure the success of such
programs in terms of improving the company’s competitive advantage.
MULTIGENERATIONAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE REPORT 5
References
About Us. (2020). Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://www.rymanhp.com/about-us/
Ali, Z., Bashir, M., & Mehreen, A. (2019). Managing Organizational Effectiveness through
Talent Management and Career Development: The Mediating Role of Employee
Engagement. Journal of Management Sciences, 6(1), 62–78. https://doi-
org.trevecca.idm.oclc.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1906105
Ho, M. (2019, December 6). Learning by the Numbers. Retrieved from
https://www.td.org/magazines/td-magazine/learning-by-the-numbers
Hut, N. (2020). How to successfully manage multiple generations in the workplace. Hfm
(Healthcare Financial Management), 74(2), 44–45.
Ryman Hospitality Properties. (2020). 2019 Annual Report. Retrieved from
http://ir.rymanhp.com/static-files/37622e68-8725-4ae8-ad83-453600639aa3
Shaw, H. (2013). Sticking Points: how to get 4 generations working together in the 12 places
they come apart. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale Momentum.