Research Paper - Information Systems Infrastructure

profilespluousp
BA633ResearchPaperGuidelines.pdf

BA633 Information Systems Infrastructure

7

RESEARCH P APER G RAD IN G RU BR IC

Criteria/Categories Indicators/Levels

Score 5 4 3-2 1

Abstract and

Introduction

_____ x 5 =

/25 Introduction

should be clear

with a preview of

the main points

Good

introductory

statement, but

the preview of

the main points

is lacking

Introductory

statement is

vague and main

points are

unclear

Issue not clear

and preview of

the main points

is incomplete

Main Points and

Sub Points

______ x 20 =

/100 Main points are

clearly stated and

developed;

specific

examples/support

ing points are

appropriate and

clearly

developed;

smooth

transitions and

well organized.

Main points are

clearly stated

but

development of

examples/suppo

rting points are

lacking; smooth

transitions

between points.

Main points are

not clear.

Audience has

difficulty

following

presentation

because student

jumps around.

Examples/supp

orting points are

appropriate but

need

elaboration or

are not well

thought out.

Main points are

not clear,

Audience

cannot

understand

presentation

because there is

no sequence of

information.

Examples/supp

orting points are

inappropriate

for issue.

Conclusion

_____ x 5 =

/25 Well-thought out

concluding

statement that

summarizes main

points well.

Well-thought

out concluding

statement but

does not

summarize

main points

well.

Does not have a

well-thought

out concluding

statement, but

summarizes

main points

well.

Has neither a

well-thought

out concluding

statement nor

summarizes

main points

well.

Spelling,

grammar and

punctuation

_____ x 6 =

/30 No more than

two errors in any

of these

categories

combined

No more than

eight errors in

any of these

categories

combined

Eight to twenty

errors in these

categories

combined.

More than

twenty errors in

these categories

combined.

Summary

_____ x 4 =

/20

Very interesting

question.

Evidence that

student has put a

great amount of

thought into the

subject.

A rather

interesting and

challenging

work, but

student doesn’t

show much

excitement in

the subject

matter.

Satisfactory

work, but does

not engage the

reader

Lack of writing

skills seen by

the quality of

work. The

concept was

clearly not well

thought out.