flu paper
HLTH 626
Avian Influenza H7N9 Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Performance |
|||
|
|
Advanced 19-20 |
Competent 16–18 |
Novice 1-15 |
Not Present 0 |
|
Length · 5-page minimum · 12-point Times New Roman · Double spaced |
Student has written 5 full pages, excluding the references. The paper is written using 12-point Times New Roman font with double spacing. Each page is worth a maximum of 4 points. |
Student has written at least 4 full pages, excluding the references, using 12-point Times New Roman font with double spacing. Each page is worth a maximum of 4 points. Points will be deducted for partial pages. |
Student has written less than 4 full pages, excluding the references, using 12-point Times New Roman font with double spacing. Each page is worth a maximum of 4 points. Points will be deducted for partial pages.
|
Paper was not submitted. |
|
|
Advanced 13-15 |
Competent 8-12 |
Novice 1-7 |
Not present 0 |
|
References · 5 minimum · Must be peer-reviewed journal or government publication · Must be current · Websites are not acceptable |
Student has gone beyond the textbooks and supplemental reading supplied in the course, and has used 5 current peer-reviewed or government sources intended for a professional audience. |
Student has gone beyond the textbooks and supplemental reading supplied in the course, and has used 4 current peer-reviewed or government sources intended for a professional audience. |
Student has used 3 or fewer current peer-reviewed or government sources intended for a professional audience. Heavy dependence on the textbook material is evident. |
Paper was not submitted. |
|
|
Advanced 9-10 |
Competent 7-8 |
Novice 1-6 |
Not Present 0 |
|
Current AMA format · Superscript citations · Sequential listing by appearance in text · Proper reference style |
Student has listed, formatted, and numbered all references according to the superscripts used for citation, such that the first citation in the text matches the first reference in the list. |
Student has attempted to list, format, and number all references according to current AMA style for references and citations, but style errors are noted. |
Student has used a style other than the prescribed AMA style, or his or her attempt to list, format, and number all references according to current AMA have significant errors in style.
|
Paper was not submitted. |
|
Criteria |
Levels of Performance |
|||
|
|
Advanced 23–25 |
Competent 19–22 |
Novice 1-18 |
Not present 0 |
|
Mechanics · Spelling · Grammar · Paragraph and sentence structure |
The paper is well-written and reads fluidly. There are no significant spelling or grammar errors. |
The paper is well-written but seems clumsy in spots. There are several significant spelling or grammar errors. |
The paper lacks continuity. There is redundancy and/or disjointed structure. There are many significant spelling or grammar errors. Revisions are necessary to reach a graduate level of writing.
|
Paper was not submitted. |
|
|
Advanced 28–30 |
Competent 23–27 |
Novice 1-22 |
Not present 0 |
|
Assessment of Scenario · Local risk · Geographic spread · Biblical concerns |
The student has accurately assessed the disease risks for the local population and spread to other geographic areas.
|
The student assessment of the disease risks for the local population is incomplete, or the predictions about spread to other geographic areas contain inaccuracies. |
The student assessment of disease risks and spread to other geographic areas is missing key features. |
Paper was not submitted. |
|
Total: Instructor’s Comments:
|
Page 1 of 1