Discussion 7
Lecture 12
The French Revolution: The Moderate Stage,
1789-1792
Beloved and loyal supporters, we require the assistance
of our faithful subjects to overcome the difficulties in
which we find ourselves concerning the current state of
our finances, and to establish, as we so wish, a constant
and invariable order in all branches of government that
concern the happiness of our subjects and the prosperity
of the realm. These great motives have induced us to
summon the Assembly of the Estates of all Provinces
obedient to us, as much to counsel and assist us in all
things placed before it, as to inform us of the wishes an
grievances of our people; so that, by means of the mutual
confidence and reciprocal love between the sovereign
and his subjects, an effective remedy may be brought as
quickly as possible to the ills of the State, and abuses of
all sorts may be averted and corrected by good and solid
means which insure public happiness and restore to us in
particular the calm and tranquility of which we have so
long been deprived.
Louis XVI's letter regarding the convocation of the Estates
General at Versailles (January 24, 1789)
The aim of every political association is the preservation
of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These
rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to
oppression.
Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (August
26, 1789)
After all these facts and the impossibility the king found
himself in to do good and prevent the evil which his
committed, is it surprising that the king sought to recover
his liberty and to get himself and his family to safety?
"Declaration of the King Addressed to All the French
About His Flight from Paris" (June 21, 1791)
It is time to teach kings that the silence of the laws about
their crimes is the ill consequence of their power, and not
the will of reason or equity. . . .
Speech of Marquis de Condorcet (December 3, 1792)
We now come to the Revolution itself. We have already
outlined some of the basic causes of the French Revolution as
well as the general features of the ancien regime. It seems
fairly clear that the closed social structure of 18 th
century
France, administrative inefficiency, bankruptcy and the
example of the American Revolution as well as Enlightenment
thought all had their effect on what would indeed occur in the
last decade of the 18 th
century. Above all, a revolutionary
mentality had been created and this alone, perhaps, is what
drove the revolutionaries forward. Our discussion will suggest
that there were actually two revolutions, or two distinct
stages within the Revolution: the moderate stage of 1789-
1792, followed by the radical stage of 1792-1794 (see
Lecture 13).
For centuries, Frenchmen had met in local electoral
assemblies in order to elect deputies for the Estates General.
This was, in theory, a representative institution. However, the
Estates General had not been called into session since 1614.
In July 1788, and because of its unresolved and mounting
financial crisis, Louis XVI called for a meeting of the Estates
General. After electing deputies, the full body was to meet in
June the following year. For the next twelve months following
Louis’ request, each Estate drew up a list of grievances, the
Cahiers de doléances. Among the lists drawn up by the
deputies of the Third Estate were expressed loyalty to Louis,
loyalty to the Church and the sanctity of private property.
Several lists called for a written constitution as well as an
elected Assembly.
As the Estates General prepared to meet, there was a general
consensus of high hope amongst all concerned Frenchmen.
As yet, no one was talking about revolution. The Estates
General met at Versailles on May 5, 1789 and there ensued
an immediate stalemate over procedure. The nobility argued
that the three Estates meet separately and vote as individual
bodies. Since the First and Second Estates were the
privileged orders, they would stand together against the
Third Estate, 2 votes to 1. The Third Estate recognized this
and instead proposed to the nobility and clergy that all
members of the Three Estates would meet as one body and
vote by head. This is an important consideration. The First
and Second Estates were composed of 300 delegates each.
But the Third Estate consisted of more than 600 solidly
middle class deputies from the ranks of government officials,
lawyers, merchants, property owners and other professionals.
Since the Third Estate had the support of liberal minded
priests and members of the nobility, they were almost
assured of a majority.
On June 10, 1789, the Third Estate broke the stalemate. They
invited the First and Second Estates to join them. Some of the
more liberal-minded members of the nobility and clergy did in
fact come over, but the stalemate continued. On June 17,
1789, the Third Estate began the French Revolution by
declaring itself a National Assembly. This was a profoundly
revolutionary act indeed. Days later, now locked out of their
meeting hall, the Third Estate moved to a tennis court and
took the OATH OF THE
TENNIS COURT, which stated
that they would not disband
until a constitution had been
drafted.
Louis ordered the National
Assembly to disband
immediately. A Declaration
sent to the Third Estate from Louis on June 23 expressed the
following demand:
The King wishes that the ancient distinction of the three
Orders of the State be preserved in its entirety, as
essentially linked to the constitution of his Kingdom; that
the deputies, freely elected by each of the three Orders,
forming three chambers, deliberating by Order . . . can
alone be considered as forming the body of the
representatives of the Nation. As a result, the King has
declared null the resolutions passed by the deputies of
the Order of the Third Estate, the 17 th
of this month, as
well as those which have followed them, as illegal and
unconstitutional . . . .
The Third Estate, stood by their solemn oath and refused to
yield to Louis’ demands.
In an effort to reach some kind of compromise, on June 27,
Louis ordered the clergy and nobility to join the Third Estate.
Of course, some members of both Estates had already done
so but the vast majority refused. I suppose Louis figured that
he could control the Third Estate if it were simply a part of a
larger body, but his plan clearly back-fired. The Third Estate
would not compromise and the First and Second Estate would
not conceive of lowering themselves to the same collective
body as the Third Estate. Instead, the nobility joined with
Louis against the National Assembly. Louis went on to order
the army to station themselves near Paris and Versailles, just
in case. Although not one shot had yet been fired, the French
Revolution had begun.
By the beginning of July, Paris had
reached a high level of tension. After
all, the convocation of the Estates
General had aroused hope for much-
needed reform. But meanwhile, the
price of bread was soaring. For
example, in August 1788, 50%of a
peasant or urban worker’s income
went toward the purchase of bread.
By July 1789, this figure had risen to 80%. To compound the
situation, there was a growing fear of an aristocratic plot
against the National Assembly. On July 14 th
, between eight
and nine hundred Parisians, mostly women, gathered in front
of that medieval fortress, the Bastille. They were looking for
weapons and gunpowder. They stormed the prison – 98 were
killed and 73 wounded. Although the Bastille contained no
hoped-for weapons, the FALL OF THE BASTILLE served, and
has always served, as a great symbol of the Revolution itself.
To many, it seemed there was now no turning back.
As a result of this journee, the aristocrats fled the country
and Louis decided to withdraw his troops from Paris. Keep in
mind, the events that we have been discussing thus far,
occurred in Paris alone. Something very different took place
in the countryside. The peasants believed that the Estates
General would solve some of their more pressing problems.
After all, they had already sent their list of grievances to
Versailles. If Louis only knew their plight, then he would take
care of them. But by June 1789, the peasants had become
restless and violent. As the price of bread continued to soar
and its supply decreased, the peasants began to attack food
convoys on their way to Paris. The peasants also refused to
pay taxes, tithes and manorial dues to their landlords, whom
they held responsible for their economic plight. By the end of
July, the peasants began to burn down the houses of their
landlords and with them, the records of their obligations to
their lords. The ancien regime was being destroyed by the
will of the people. But why did the peasants turn violent? A
rumor began to spread that the aristocrats had organized an
army to kill the peasants. This was only a rumor, but the
Great Fear, as this episode is known, led the peasants to take
arms against an imaginary foe. The Great Fear worked to the
advantage of the Parisian reformers and provided the
National Assembly with the opportunity to criticize
aristocratic privilege. So, on AUGUST 4, 1789, French
aristocrats surrendered their special privileges by decree
(ratified August 11, 1789). This journee marks of destruction
of the remnants of feudalism.
On the night of August 4, several members of the Assembly
drew up a key document of the French Revolution – this was
the DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN AND THE CITIZEN.
On August 26, the Declaration was formally adopted by the
National Assembly. A moral document through and through,
the Declaration outlined man’s natural rights. The purpose of
such a Declaration was to rally the country and to add
support to the National Assembly.
The representatives of the French
people, organized as a National
Assembly, believing that the
ignorance, neglect, or contempt of
the rights of man are the sole cause
of public calamities and of the
corruption of governments, have
determined to set forth in a solemn
declaration the natural, unalienable,
and sacred rights of man, in order
that this declaration, being
constantly before all the members
of the Social body, shall remind
them continually of their rights and duties; in order that
the acts of the legislative power, as well as those of the
executive power, may be compared at any moment with
the objects and purposes of all political institutions and
may thus be more respected, and, lastly, in order that the
grievances of the citizens, based hereafter upon simple
and incontestable principles, shall tend to the
maintenance of the constitution and redound to the
happiness of all.
Barely 300 words in length, it could be printed cheaply on
one side of a single sheet of paper. The Declaration appeared
all over France and was subsequently translated into every
major European language. As a symbol, it became the gospel
of the new French social order.
Louis accepted neither the decrees of August 4 nor the
Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen. However, on
October 5, 1789, several hundred Parisian men and women
marched the twelve miles to Versailles in order to protest the
lack of bread to Louis and the National Assembly. At the same
time, 20,000 Paris Guards loyal to the Revolution set out to
join the mob gathered at Versailles. Louis had no choice but
to promise bread and return to Paris with the protesters. Louis
was now the captive of the people. He promised bread. He
approved the decrees of August 4 including the Declaration of
the Rights of Man and the Citizen.
With the conclusion of the OCTOBER
DAYS the King and the National
Assembly left Versailles for Paris. By
the end of 1789, Louis had made
several concessions to the National
Assembly, none of which he sincerely
intended to keep. The people of Paris and the French
countryside loved their king as a child loves his father. Louis
was not to blame for the misfortunes of France, instead, his
evil ministers were held responsible. So, by bringing Louis to
Paris, it was hoped he would be less influenced by his evil
and corrupt ministers. But on June 20, 1791, Louis XVI did
something which earned him the general distrust of most
French subjects. He planned to raise an army and crush the
revolution. He appealed to Leopold II, the brother of Marie
Antoinette, who promised Louis Austrian troops if Louis could
reach Montmédy and mobilize a sizable French force. Louis
did not intend to leave France except as a last resort.
At ten o'clock on the night of June 20, a berline, or heavy
coach, drawn by four horses, pulled up at the south end of
the Tuileries. At intervals until 11:30,
the coach picked up members of the
royal family, all of whom were
dressed in disguise -- Louis as a valet,
Marie Antoinette as a children's
governess. It had been planned that
as Louis passed through major cities
and towns that his troops would be
nearby. If he kept on schedule, Louis ought to arrived at
Montmédy the following day. But it was not to be. Louis
began to treat this serious occasion as an excursion -- he
ordered extra stops so that he could sup on his favorite meals
and on one occasion he was recognized at Ste.-Ménéhould by
an old soldier, Jean-Baptiste Drouet.
Drouet rode ahead to the small village of Varennes and with
the help of the locals, blocked the bridge across the Meuse
River. At midnight, Louis' berline was stopped at the bridge
and Louis immediately admitted who he was. The royal party
was treated to dinner and treated with utmost respect. Of
course, all the church bells began to ring and by morning,
10,000 peasants were in the streets of Varennes. Finally, at 6
A.M. on June 22, representatives of the National Assembly
arrived on the scene, escorted by the National Guardsmen.
Three day later, the royal family was back at the Tuileries.
Louis was now a prisoner of the Revolution and an enemy of
the Revolution. With the FLIGHT TO VARENNES, the National
Assembly began to wonder just how possible a limited
monarchy really was, or if indeed it was now even necessary.
Regardless, between the October Days of 1789 and
September 1791, the National Assembly busied itself with
reforms meant to dismantle the ancien regime. They
accomplished this with six basic reforms
1. the abolition of special privileges of the nobility through
the legalization of equality (August 4, 1789)
2. they made their statement of human rights with the
Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (August
4, 1789)
3. they subordinated Church to State. In November 1789,
the National Assembly confiscated all Church property.
And in early 1790, they passed the CIVIL CONSTITUTION
OF THE CLERGY which reduced the power of the bishops.
The clergy was now selected and paid by the State
4. in September 1791, the National Assembly drew up a
constitution, something it had been trying to do since
June 1789. The constitution of 1791 specified such liberal
ideas as a limited monarchy and full equality before the
law
5. the National Assembly also made every effort to replace
the inefficient and uncoordinated provinces with 83 new
administrative units nearly equal in size. A standardized
system of courts was introduced, the sale of judicial
offices was abolished, citizen-filled juries were introduced
and torture was abolished
6. in terms of economic reforms, the National Assembly
adopted a uniform system of weights and measures, guild
restrictions were abolished and customs on goods
transported within the country were eliminated
By the end of September 1791, the National Assembly
announced that its work was done. In many ways, the
Constitution of 1791 seemed to fulfill the promises of reform
which had been first uttered by the men of 1789. All
Frenchmen could now be proud that the following rights had
been secured: equality before the law, careers open to talent,
a written constitution, and parliamentary government
With this in mind, there was a sizeable faction within the
National Assembly who were so satisfied that they claimed
the Revolution to be at an end, since its primary aims had
been achieved. But, revolutionary times are unpredictable. By
1792, the Revolution moved in a more radical and violent
direction. This radical direction was neither desired nor
anticipated by the men of 1789. Why the Revolution became
radical is interesting and there are basically two reasons why
it did so. First, a counter-revolution, loyal to Church and King,
was led by the noble and the clergy and supported by
staunch Catholic peasants. Because this counter-revolution
threatened the changes of the revolutionaries, the
revolutionaries had to resort to more drastic measures than
hitherto imagined. Second, the economic, social, and political
discontent of the urban working classes also propelled the
Revolution in the direction of radicalism. These were the
small shop-keepers, artisans and wage earners. These were
the sans-culottes (see Lecture 13), men who defined
themselves not only by their trade but also by the clothes
they wore. They wore trousers or pants as opposed to the
knee-britches of their social superiors. The sans-culottes had
played a role in revolutionary events since 1789, but they
had, as a class, received few gains. As one historian has
written:
The sans-culottes saw that a privilege of wealth was
taking the place of a privilege of birth. They foresaw that
the bourgeoisie would succeed the fallen aristocracy as
the ruling class.
- 1