expert

profiletulip78
AssuranceofLearningExercise-CaseStudyofSafetyNetHospitalGradingRubric1.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Strategic Competitive Situation

18 to >15.0 pts

Advanced

Superior identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes at least 3 environmental factors in the analysis.

15 to >14.0 pts

Proficient

Identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes 2 environmental factors in the analysis.

14 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Marginal identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes only 1 environmental factor in the analysis.

0 pts

Not Present

Substandard identification of strategic competitive situation.

18 pts

Assessment of Strategy Strategic Leverage

18 to >16.0 pts

Advanced

Included a superior assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.

16 to >14.0 pts

Proficient

Included an assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.

14 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Marginally included an assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not include assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.

18 pts

Next Strategic Steps

18 to >16.0 pts

Advanced

Clearly provides at least 3 strategic planning recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.

16 to >14.0 pts

Proficient

Provides 2 strategic planning recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.

14 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Marginally provides a recommendation of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.

0 pts

Not Present

Does not provide recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.

18 pts

Supported by Current Literature and Industry Best Practices

16 to >14.0 pts

Advanced

All 5 supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years.

14 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

Most of the supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Some of the supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.

0 pts

Not Present

Less than half of the supporting references are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.

16 pts

Assurance of Learning Exercise: Case Study of Safety Net Hospital Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Page Length 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

Explained in at least 5 pages

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Explained in 3–4 pages.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Explained in 2 pages.

0 pts

Not Present

Explained in 1 or fewer pages.

10 pts

APA Format 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

No APA formatting issues are identified.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

One or two APA formatting issues are identified.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Three to five APA formatting issues are identified.

0 pts

Not Present

Six or more APA formatting issues are identified.

10 pts

Grammar and/or Spelling

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

No grammar or spelling issues are identified.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

One or two grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Three to five grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.

0 pts

Not Present

Six or more grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Assurance of Learning Exercise: Case Study of Safety Net Hospital Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230