expert
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification of Strategic Competitive Situation
18 to >15.0 pts
Advanced
Superior identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes at least 3 environmental factors in the analysis.
15 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
Identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes 2 environmental factors in the analysis.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Marginal identification of strategic competitive situation. Includes only 1 environmental factor in the analysis.
0 pts
Not Present
Substandard identification of strategic competitive situation.
18 pts
Assessment of Strategy Strategic Leverage
18 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
Included a superior assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
Included an assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Marginally included an assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not include assessment of the strategic leverage the organization had over area hospitals.
18 pts
Next Strategic Steps
18 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
Clearly provides at least 3 strategic planning recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
Provides 2 strategic planning recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Marginally provides a recommendation of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.
0 pts
Not Present
Does not provide recommendation(s) of next steps for strategic action grounded in current literature or best practices.
18 pts
Supported by Current Literature and Industry Best Practices
16 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
All 5 supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years.
14 to >12.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.
12 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some of the supporting references, excluding the textbook, are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.
0 pts
Not Present
Less than half of the supporting references are scholarly and/or have been peer reviewed within the last 5 years, or fewer than three references are included.
16 pts
Assurance of Learning Exercise: Case Study of Safety Net Hospital Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Page Length 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Explained in at least 5 pages
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Explained in 3–4 pages.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Explained in 2 pages.
0 pts
Not Present
Explained in 1 or fewer pages.
10 pts
APA Format 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
No APA formatting issues are identified.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
One or two APA formatting issues are identified.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Three to five APA formatting issues are identified.
0 pts
Not Present
Six or more APA formatting issues are identified.
10 pts
Grammar and/or Spelling
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
No grammar or spelling issues are identified.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
One or two grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Three to five grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.
0 pts
Not Present
Six or more grammar and/or spelling issues are identified.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Assurance of Learning Exercise: Case Study of Safety Net Hospital Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230