policy assessment
Nova Southeastern University
Ron and Kathy Assaf College of Nursing 1
NSG 5130: Health Care Policy and Leadership
Online Activities and Assignments
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 1 |
Introduction to Health Care Policy and Leadership
· Policy and politics · Policy models · Policy decision making: consumers, providers, and regulatory bodies · Spheres of influence for nurse leaders
|
Review: Getting Started on Canvas Home Page. Review and print out the Syllabus and Activities & Assignment Note: Each week begins on Monday at 12:01 AM/EST and ends on Sunday at 11:59 PM/EST
*** Note: For all written activities, discussion postings, and assignments, students may use the articles posted in the class only in addition to the required peer-reviewed scholarly journals and references. ***
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapters 1 and 10
Week 1 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 1 content Journal Article(s): Jurns, C. (2019). Policy advocacy motivators and barriers: Research results and application. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 24 (3). Martsolf, G. R. & Thomas, T. H. (2019). Integrating political philosophy into health policy education. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 20 (1), 18-27.
Discussion Board Posting and Meet Your Classmates (3 points): Please introduce yourself to your classmates and, if you wish, attach a picture of yourself. Respond to a few of your classmates’ posts when they become available. Here is some information you may want to include in your post: · Your name · Brief personal background about your interests, hobbies, etc. · Your current courses and major · Future plans · Your picture attachment
Nurses have a large role on the healthcare team and their knowledge of providing care to individuals, groups, and communities is not fully utilized. To effectively lead the public in health care policy one must understand the many different types of health care policies and the political processes. Read Porche (2019); chapter one to better understand policies and political strategies to implement change. Choose one health issue from the past five years that demonstrates how nurses have influenced policy change and discuss the following: · Identify the agenda of the health policy. · Analyze the competing agendas of the stakeholders and the public opinion regarding the policy. · Describe the MSN Essential that supports the master’s prepared nurse leader’s participation in the chosen health policy. · Identify the state and federal initiatives that affect the policy. Assignment 1: Healthcare Policy Bill Selection (5 points): · Review the instructions that follow this grid · Post to discussion board forum Assignment 1: Health Care Policy Bill Selection by Monday of Week 2
|
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 2 |
US Government, Legislative Process, and Nurse Leaders as Policymakers
· Executive, legislative and judicial branches of government · Legislative process · Policy formation, implementation, and analysis · Nurses as policymakers |
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapters 3-5 (pp. 49-99), 9 (153-162), and 15 (pgs. 280 – 290) Week 2 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 2 content) Journal Article(s): Causo, C. C., Baldwin, C. M., Berger, A., Chasens, E.R., Edmonson, J. C. Gobel, B. H., Landis, C.A., Patriciain, P. A., Redeker, N. S., Scott, L. D., Todero, C. Trinkoff, A., & Tucker, S. (2019). Policy brief: Nurse fatigue, sleep, and health, and ensuring patient and public safety. Nursing Outlook, (67) 5, 615-619.
Discussion Board Posting (3 points): Select an institutional policy in your practice setting affecting patients, service, or staff to identify and discuss the following issues: · Discuss the policy initiative and its stakeholders. · Describe the perceived outcome(s) resulting from the selected initiative and how it addresses the health care issue. · Identify pros and cons to the initiative and how these impact stakeholders.
Assignment 2: Policy Brief Paper (19 points): Students will develop a written Policy Brief utilizing the chosen state or federal bill selected in Assignment 1. A policy brief is a “short document providing findings and recommendations to an audience who may not be experts in an area of interest” which serves to give policy advice (DeMarco & Adams, 2014, p. 209). Nurse leaders can utilize a policy brief to explain a perceived problem to an administrator, constituents, and/or legislators. A policy brief provides a quick snapshot of the problem or the issue and a solution. Review the section Policy Briefs pp. 300-302 and Box 15-11, in Porche (2019), the journal articles provided in Week 2, and new resources posted below to assist in understanding the intent and the development of a policy brief. · Review the instructions and grading rubric that follow this grid · Submit paper to Turnitin Direct prior to submitting to Assignment Drop Box · Make any revisions necessary based on the Originality Report · Submit to the Assignment Drop Box by the posted due date
|
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 3 |
Health Care Organization and Health Care Delivery Issues
· Primary, secondary, and tertiary care · Delivery of health care: Health care systems · Policy Institutes · White Papers
|
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapters 14 (pp. 263-271) and 17 (349-358) Recommended Reading: · Bodenheimer and Grumbach: Chapters 5 & 6 (pp. 45-74) Week 3 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 3 content Journal Article(s): Smith, L. B. (2021). The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery. Health Economics, 1-21.
Online Class Activity 1 (5 points): Based on the policy brief that you submitted present a policy speech. This is a recorded 5 minute (maximum) presentation using Kaltura media (reference slide only). · Follow the instructions for using Kaltura located in the Kaltura Resources in the modules · Develop a policy speech in Kaltura utilizing Porche (2019) Box 15-10 Policy Speech Guidelines to organize the presentation · Utilize the Policy Brief Evaluation Criteria found in Porche (2019) Box 15-12 when responding to one peer Initial post due by Thursday and one reply by Sunday. See instructions following the grid Discussion Board Posting (3 points): A Position Paper, also known as a White Paper, is a tool to educate and inform the public on a specific health issue. This authoritative document takes a specific position or recommends a specific approach to solving an identified problem. Choose a White Paper and include the link. In this discussion, students will evaluate the White Paper and consider the quality and source of the message. The post should include: · an overview of the White Paper selected and how it relates to a health care policy effort of interest to the master’s prepared nurse - include its' source and purpose · how the chosen White Paper can advance current health systems, practice, and/or organizations to improve health outcomes · the selected White Papers' impact on economic, legal, and/or regulatory processes
|
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 4 |
Reimbursement and Cost Containment
· Reimbursement methods used in health care today · Health care costs and health outcomes · Strategies for cost containment · Nurse leader’s role in cost containment, reimbursement, and health outcomes
|
Readings: · Bodenheimer and Grumbach: Chapters 2 - 4, and 9
Week 4 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 4 content. Discussion Board Posting (3 points): Hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) affect a healthcare organizations’ economy (bottom line). Choose a HAC and discuss the following: · Describe the selected HAC. · Analyze the economic effects of the HAC supported by data. · Interrupt how the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Non-Payment Policy impacts provisions for providing cost-effective care. · Choose an evidence-based policy that supports reduction of HAC and how the masters prepared nurse can promote it.
Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Scholarly Paper (25 Points): · Review the instructions and grading rubric that follow this grid · Submit paper to Turnitin Direct prior to submitting to Assignment Drop Box · Make any revisions necessary based on the Originality Report · Submit to the Assignment Drop Box by the posted due date |
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 5 |
Nurse Leader Role in Policy and Politics
· Policy, law, and regulation · Political and professional engagement · Advocating for policy change · State and national professional nursing organizations
|
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapter 7 Week 5 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 5 content Online Class Activity 2 (5 points): · Initial post due by Thursday and one reply by Sunday · See instructions following the grid · Many professional nursing organizations engage in the development of health policy. One way nurses participate in health and nursing policy issues is through membership in one or more of these organizations. · Choose one local, state, or national nursing organization other than American Nurses Association (ANA) that has an interest in policy development and advocacy. Include the following criteria in the post: · Describe the organizational status (national / date) · Discuss the vision/mission · Identify the organization’s mandates or objectives/goals · Describe the policy goals (if they have written one) · Discuss policy products (briefs, positions statements, White Papers, social media) · Assess the webpage that outlines their political activity · Describe the mechanisms for nurses to engage in the activity Discussion Board Posting (3 points): The Future of Nursing 2020-2030 under the auspices of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine produced a consensus report through an ad hoc committee that charts a path for the nursing profession to help our nation create a culture of health, reduce health disparities, and improve the health and well-being of the U.S. population in the 21st century. Review the link in the module and choose a chapter that is relevant to your nursing career. (An example it that nurse educators might search for education). In relation to health policy development, identify an advanced practice nurse initiative, policy, law, regulation that is being promoted by a state or federal nursing organization. Research the area of concern and discuss two of the following. · The goals of the goals of the recommended action. · Target possible stakeholders who would benefit from the recommendations and those organizations which may become allies. · Describe tactics that advanced practice nurses could implement to improve political engagement of their coworkers.
|
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 6 |
Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Evaluating Policy
· Policy research and evidence-based regulation · Policy evaluation models · Quality Improvement models |
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapters 12 (pp. 237 – 249) · Bodenheimer and Grumbach (2016): Chapter 10 Week 6 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 6 content Journal Article(s): Sae, S. (2017). CMS Nonpayment policy, quality improvement, and hospital-acquired conditions: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 32, 55-61.
Discussion Board Posting (3 points): Select a peer-reviewed journal that has a research study [ not provided in the course readings] related to quality monitoring (needle stick, falls, etc…) in health care delivery and: · Discuss a brief overview of the article · Describe the process indicator or outcome indicator that is used to measure quality · Analyze whether the indicator effectively measures the problem - why or why not · Discuss the economic, legal, and regulatory processes that affect the quality initiative · Identify a way to monitor and measure one aspect of your current practice (turning patients, time spent collaborating with other health care workers, medication delivery, etc...)
|
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 7 |
Policy Leadership at the Local, State, and Federal Levels
· Board governance · Organizational bylaws and policy decision making · Nursing practice: State Boards of Nursing and Nurse Practice Acts
|
Readings: · Porche (2019): Chapter 13 Week 7 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 7 content Online Class Activity 3 (5 points): Corresponding to legislators is an important way to advocate for patients and the nursing profession. Provide a formal letter to the legislator in your district related to a controversial health topic · the letter should support the specific position or recommended approach to solving the identified problem · initial post due by Thursday and one reply by Sunday · see instructions following the grid Discussion Board Posting (3 points): As nurse leaders, it is necessary to know current issues. Nurses must participate in the policy process and advocate for the nursing profession at the institutional, local, and state levels. The following criteria should be included in this weeks’ post: · Discuss the purpose and goals of the Florida Action Coalition. · Identify two issues and/or challenges facing nursing over the next 10 years with a context of the problem. · Explain how can the nurse become involved in policy and advocacy at the institutional, local, and state levels – be specific. Assignment 4: Policy Issue/Action PowerPoint Presentation (15 points): · Review the instructions and grading rubric that follow this grid · Submit to the Assignment Drop Box by the posted due date |
|
WEEK |
TOPICAL OUTLINE |
ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
Week 8 |
Past, present, and future of health care reform: Conflicts and challenges
· Health care reform · Inequities related to health care access · Tensions in health care · Nurses’ role as leaders in changing policy decision making
Complete the course and instructor evaluations! Thank you
|
Readings: · Bodenheimer & Grumbach (2016): Chapters 15,16 and 17 Week 8 Content · Go to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 8 content Journal Article(s): Manchikanti, L., Helm II, S., Benyamin, R. M., & Hirsch, J. A. (2017). Evolution of US Health Care Reform. Pain Physician, 20(3), 107-110. Nickitas, D. M. (2016). Policy, politics, and the presidential campaign: What's at stake for nursing? Nursing Economic$, 34(5), 213-254.
Assignment 4 cont’d: Policy Issue/Action Power Point Presentation: · Create a thread and submit the Kaltura presentation to discussion board by Monday of Week 8 · Critique and comment on two classmate’s presentations by Friday of Week 8 · Responses may be on the same day; no references needed · A total of two points are attached from Assignment 4 and will be reflected on final grade of the assignment. Please review Grading Rubric for Assignment 4.
Online Instructor and Course Evaluations · Please complete the Course and Instructor Evaluations · Link sent in the NSU Email · Thank you!
|
Discussion Board Instructions and Rubric for MSN Online and Hybrid Courses
The purpose of the Weekly Discussions is to develop a scholarly and dynamic exchange between students, faculty, and other students in the course promoting an active and engaging online learning community. Your success, and the success of your classmates in a positive learning environment, are dependent on discussion participation and timely completion of assignments.
Use these guidelines and rubric for all discussion board postings. Each week begins on Monday at 12:01 AM/EST and ends on Sunday at 11:59 PM/EST. ***Initial postings cannot begin until Monday 12:01 AM/EST of each week. The instructor will delete any posts (initial postings and/or responses) made prior to the start of each week (Monday at 12:01 AM/EST).
Tips for Posting
· All writing and references must follow current American Psychological Association (APA) standards
· Points will not be deducted for font, italicizing, and indentation in the discussion board
· There are no “make-ups” for not posting to the Weekly Discussions
· Avoid postings that are limited to 'I agree' or 'great idea', etc. If you agree (or disagree) with a posting, then say why you agree (or disagree) by supporting your statement with concepts from the readings or by bringing in a related example or experience
· Address the questions as much as possible
· Synthesize the readings into your own words (you may use quotes and paraphrasing from the articles as needed) to support your postings. Expand on your insights and reflect on the material. Be sure to follow APA standards
· Build on other responses to create threads
· Go back and look at the responses posted to your Initial Post. Your peers or the instructor may ask questions of you that you can answer as a Peer Response Post
· Bring in related prior knowledge (work experience, prior coursework, readings, etc.)
· Use proper etiquette (address your peer by name, use professional language, etc.)
|
Requirement |
Description |
Comments |
|
Weekly Discussion Posting |
· Consists of one initial posting by Wednesday of each week (1 point each) and three responses to other student’s due by Sunday (0.5 points each) · Students are to be on the discussion board a minimum of four (4) days per week as evidenced by initial and response postings · All initial and response postings are to be on separate days · Use the reply button for all postings |
· Students are expected to participate in weekly discussions on at least four separate days out of seven in the week.
|
|
Initial Post |
· One initial post required each week · Due by Wednesday at 11:59 PM/EST · Support initial posting with two professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references properly cited in American Psychological Association (APA) format · The articles provided in the course may not be used as the required reference · The course textbook and/or articles may be used in addition to the required two journal references |
· The initial posting should be substantive demonstrating critical thinking and thoughts delving deeper into the discussion topic and course content
|
|
Response Post to Peers |
· Three responses to peers on three separate days required each week · Begins Monday at 12:01 AM/EST, ends Sunday at 11:59 PM/EST · Each response must include one reference properly cited in APA format from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journals · The articles provided in the course may not be used as the required reference · The course textbook and/or articles may be used in addition to the required one journal references |
· Responses are substantive interactions that build on the ideas of others and delving deeper into the discussion questions and course content in response to colleague’s postings · I Agree is not an appropriate response for any postings
|
|
Responses to the Professor |
· Considered a reply to a peer · Same requirements as those to a peer · In some instances, the professor will ask the student to elaborate on the initial posting, in this case, the student’s response will not be considered a reply to a peer |
|
|
References |
· Internet documents including Google references, blogs, Wikipedia, .com, or other non-scholarly documents should not be used for references · Creditable Internet websites include .org, .edu, .gov or Health On the Net (HON) approved sites · Scholarly professional online journals retrieved from the library using bibliographic databases or national professional organizations are acceptable · All articles must be within a five-year timeframe unless otherwise stated by the instructor or a classic/historical source as defined by APA · Citation of an article/source/reference implies that the student has personally retrieved and read the cited work · Complete citations within the body of the postings and the reference list according to APA format |
· Responses over the required number can be made without references
|
|
APA Format/Writing Quality |
· All writing and references must follow current APA standards · All discussion posts must reflect proficient writing skills consistent with your educational preparation. For example, a student is expected to spell words correctly, avoid using slang or text messaging language, punctuate and avoid syntax errors · Spelling, grammar, and organization should reflect scholarly writing · Focused on proper format for references and citations |
· Versions of Microsoft Word do not always allow the formatting [font, italicizing, and indentation] to be carried over to the Canvas forum · Points will not be deducted for font, italicizing, and indentation
|
|
Discussion Group |
· Groups may not be used in all courses · If utilized, participate in the assigned group |
· Groups may not be used in all courses |
MSN Online and Hybrid Discussion Board Grading Rubric
|
Initial Post |
1 point |
0.5 points |
0.25 points |
|
|
The initial posting is substantive demonstrating critical thinking and thoughts delving deeper into the discussion topic and course content and includes a minimum of two professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The initial posting is somewhat substantive and/or includes only one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or completed by Thursday at 11:59 PM/EST. |
The initial posting is not substantive or submitted after Thursday at 11:59 PM/EST. The initial post does not include a reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. Posted on same day as a response posting. |
|
Response 1 |
0.5 points |
0.3 points |
0 points |
|
|
The response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.
|
The response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting. |
|
Response 2 |
0.5 points |
0.3 points |
0 points |
|
|
The response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting. |
|
Response 3 |
0.5 points |
0.3 points |
0 points |
|
|
The response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. |
The response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting. |
|
Clarity, APA |
0.5 points |
0.3 points |
0 points |
|
|
Posting and responses are clear, concise, and in proper APA format for citations and references. No grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds worth to the dialogue and the comments build on the previous statements of others. |
Posting and responses are somewhat clear. Proper APA format for citation and reference noted in some areas but some APA infractions are apparent. Minor grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds to the dialogue, but some repetition and/or unclear thought is noted. |
Posting and responses are unclear. APA format not followed. Grammatical errors are noted. The entry does not build on previous dialogue. |
|
Total Points |
3 points |
|
Updated 5.22.18 DTH/SH/LS/TMP |
Online Class Activities (5 points each)
Students will engage in individual class activities on the discussion board. All activities and YouTube videos (if required) are located on the discussion board for each week.
Activity Criteria:
Students must include the following criteria for each individual activity:
1. One initial posting by Thursday at 11:59 PM/EST.
0. Include one scholarly peer-reviewed reference for the initial posting
1. Minimum of one response to other students by Sunday at 11:59 PM /EST.
0. Include one scholarly peer-reviewed reference for response postings
1. All posts need to be on two separate days.
1. The textbook assigned to the course may be used in addition to the required references for posting for this class.
Online Weekly Activities Grading Rubric (5 points)
Assignment 1: Health Care Policy Bill Selection (5 points)
Read “Nurses’ Stages of Political Engagement” in Porche (2019) pages 280-281.
Assignment Criteria:
1. Research and choose a state or federal bill related to a health care policy issue of interest.
· This bill will be used for all course assignments
· The issue can be a bill that was passed in a recent legislative session, an issue currently in the legislature, or an issue presented in the legislative session but ‘died’ in committee
· No duplicate bills unless approved by the instructor
2. Place the title of the bill in the subject line of the discussion post.
3. Post a brief description of the bill on the discussion board. Use bulleted format.
· Identify if it is a state or federal bill
· Include the bill’s number (H.R.# or S#), title, purpose, intended group/population, and outcome (if already determined)
· Identify the bill’s legislative sponsors
· Explain the reason for selection
4. Post to the discussion board forum Assignment 1: Health Care Policy Bill Selection by Monday Week 2 at 11:59 PM/EST.
Assignment 1: Health Care Policy Bill Selection Grading Rubric (5 points)
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
Assignment If you need help in these sections (Amount and Quality), please consult the library or your professor. Information |
Assignment is explicit, focused, and includes all assignment criteria |
Assignment is not clear nor maintains focus throughout. Major lapses in focus or relevance to assignment criteria |
|
Total |
|
|
Assignment 2: Policy Brief (19 Points)
Students will develop a written Policy Brief utilizing the chosen state or federal bill selected in Assignment 1. A policy brief is a “short document providing findings and recommendations to an audience who may not be experts in an area of interest” which serves to give policy advice (DeMarco & Adams, 2014, p. 209). Nurse leaders can utilize a policy brief to explain a perceived problem to an administrator, constituents, and/or legislators. A policy brief provides a quick snapshot of the problem or the issue and a solution.
Review the section Policy Briefs pp. 300-302 and Box 15-11, in Porche (2019), the journal articles provided in Week 2, and new resources posted below to assist in understanding the intent and the development of a policy brief.
Reference
DeMarco, R., & Adams, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219-224.
Assignment Criteria
Students will develop a written Policy Brief addressing the following:
1. Introduce the selected state or federal bill used in Assignment 1.
2. Provide a summary of the issue or problem related to the chosen state or federal bill selected in Assignment 1.
3. Describe the background information related to the issue or problem.
· Include key regulatory and legislative history and any related data.
4. Explain policy options or alternatives.
· Include pros and cons of any policy option or alternative, timetable of action, political perspective with policy option and alternative, and political vote count for each policy option if known.
· If not available, please note in the brief.
5. Discuss various stakeholder perspectives on each policy option or alternative if available.
· Provide recommended actions.
6. The Policy Brief should be in narrative format and two to three pages in length excluding the title and reference page.
7. No introductory paragraph, purpose statement or conclusion is needed for this Policy Brief Assignment.
8. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the Policy Brief Assignment.
9. Include three professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and should be less than five years old.
10. APA format required (attention to spelling/grammar, title page, reference page, and in-text citations).
11. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
12. Submit by the posted due date.
Additional Resources
Policy Briefs
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/policy-briefs/ (Links to an external site.)
Health Policy Brief Series
https://nursing.gwu.edu/health-policy-brief-series (Links to an external site.)
Examples of Policy Briefs
Please note, if this relates to your issue or problem, you cannot use the information in these examples.
A Matter of Conscience: Examining the Law and Policy of Conscientious Objection in Health Care
https://gwu.app.box.com/v/Policy-Brief-Fry-Bowers (Links to an external site.)
Ensuring Access to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
https://gwu.app.box.com/s/kj1wb8le4ub6ibl9lpatrrds1j1ll0pf (Links to an external site.)
Lack of Payment for Dental Services Leading to Poor Oral Health
https://gwu.app.box.com/s/1y4cx8u6srwl3e0iyrtp2hnzbk2y0ji9 (Links to an external site.)
Child Mental Health: A Time for Innovation
Assignment 2: Policy Brief Grading Rubric (19 Points)
|
Assignment Criteria |
8 points |
6 points |
4 points |
2 points |
|
|
All topics/criteria addressed, and all questions fully answered |
All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions fully answered. |
One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered |
One or more topics /criteria not addressed, and most questions partially answered |
|
Quality/Accuracy of Information |
5 points |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
|
|
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given. |
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria. |
|
Organization |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
|
|
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. |
Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. |
There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist. No levels of heading. |
The information or overall structure appears disorganized. |
|
Sources |
2 points |
1 point |
0.5 points |
0 points |
|
|
All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source. |
The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source. |
Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. |
Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. |
|
Earned Points |
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar. |
||||
|
Final Total |
Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Scholarly Paper (25 points)
In this assignment, students will examine the selected bill from Assignment 2 and critically analyze and evaluate the context in which the area of concern or issue relates to the policy making process.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. State the selected bill including the bill number and title.
2. Identity the area of concern or issue clarifying the underlying and related concerns.
3. Describe the background of the area of concern or issue - assess economic, legal, and regulatory processes that prompted the writing of the bill
4. Identify all direct and/or indirect stakeholders and stakeholder position on the area of concern.
5. Identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to the bill.
6. Evaluate how issues in the bill will affect stakeholders at an institutional, local, state, and/or federal level.
7. Using the Essentials of Master’s Education, propose two ways the master’s prepared nurse leader can act as a change agent, contribute to the policy-making process, and advocate for quality, cost-effective care.
8. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages excluding the title and reference page.
9. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.
10. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
11. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
12. Include a minimum of five (5) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old. Instructor can revise these guidelines to include websites.
13. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
14. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the Originality Report, and make any needed changes.
15. Submit to the Assignment Thread by the posted due date.
Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Scholarly Paper Grading Rubric (25 points)
|
Assignment Criteria |
10 points |
8 points |
6 points |
4 points |
|
|
All topics/criteria addressed, and all questions fully answered. |
All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answered. |
All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions partially answered |
One or more topics /criteria not addressed or completely answered |
|
Quality/Accuracy of Information |
8 points |
6 points |
4 points |
2 points |
|
|
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given. |
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria. |
|
Organization |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
|
|
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. |
Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. |
There is an attempt at organization but errors exist. No levels of heading. |
The information or overall structure appears disorganized. |
|
Sources |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
|
All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source. |
The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source. |
Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. |
Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. |
|
Earned Points |
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar. |
||||
|
Final Total |
|
|
|
|
Assignment 4: Policy Issue/Action PowerPoint Presentation (15 points)
Students will utilize Assignment 3 and develop a PowerPoint (PPT) and Kaltura presentation on the selected policy/issue. The Kaltura presentation is a method to get the issue/action message across to those who make the decisions.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:
1. Introduce the bill and reason for selection
2. Overview of bill: Number, title, sponsor, and brief background area of concern or issue
3. Identify all direct and/or indirect stakeholders and stakeholder position on the area of concern
4. Identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to the bill
5. Explain how issues in the bill will affect stakeholders at an institutional, local, state, and/or federal level.
6. List two ways the masters prepared nurse leader can act as a change agent, contribute to the policy-making process, and advocate for quality, cost-effective care.
7. Develop a recorded PowerPoint presentation/PPT using Kaltura in the form of a scholarly presentation. Follow the instructions for using Kaltura located in the Canvas Course Menu under APA Documents/Resources.
8. After making the PPT, utilize Kaltura media to present the PPT with voice over (use computer and microphone).
9. For presentation clarification, include presenter’s notes in the click to add section to explain the slide.
10. The PowerPoint presentation should not be more than 8-10 slides ( excluding the title slide and reference slide) and ten (10) minutes in length. Be complete and concise. Use bulleted statements not complete sentences or paragraphs.
11. Use APA format for PPT, which always includes a title slide, a reference slide, and APA requirements. Resources found in APA Documents/Resources.
12. A minimum of five (5) references will be required for this assignment. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (check Ulrich's Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
13. Post the Kaltura presentation to the discussion board by Monday of Week 8. Critique and comment to two classmates by Friday, responses may be on the same day, no references required.
14. Submit the PPT AND the Kaltura presentation to the Assignment Thread by the posted due date.
Include the following slides:
· Slide 2: Introduction - For the Kaltura presentation, introduce yourself and give a brief overview on why you chose this bill
· Slide 3: Purpose statement
· Slide 4: Overview of bill: Number, title, sponsor, and brief background on the bill’s legislative history
· Slide 5: Identify all direct and/or indirect stakeholders and stakeholder position on the area of concern
· Slide 6: Identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to the bill
· Slide 7: Explain how issues in the bill will affect stakeholders at an institutional, local, state, and/or federal level.
· Slide 8: List two ways the masters prepared nurse leader can act as a change agent, contribute to the policy-making process, and advocate for quality, cost-effective care.
· Slide 9: Conclusion
· Slide 10: References in APA format (include in-text citations on slides).
Assignment 4: Policy Issue/Action PowerPoint Presentation (15 points)
|
Assignment Criteria/ Quality/Accuracy of Information |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
|
All criteria addressed. Information provided relates to the topic and includes supporting details, rationale, and/or examples. |
1-2 criteria omitted and/or information provided did not relate to the topic or include supporting details, rationale, and/or examples. |
3-4 criteria omitted and/or information provided did not relate to the topic or include supporting details, rationale, and/or examples. |
Greater than 4 criteria omitted and/or information provided did not relate to the topic and did not include supporting details, rationale, and/or examples. |
|
Organization/Headings |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
|
Headings present and wording readable from 3 feet away design layout is neat and attractive; citation(s) present on slide, information logically organized according to the assignment criteria utilizing well-constructed bullet points. |
Headings not present and/or wording is not readable from 3 feet away and/or design layout is not neat and attractive and/or information not logically organized according to the assignment criteria utilizing well-constructed bullet points. |
Headings not present and wording not readable from 3 feet away. There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist.
|
Headings not included and/or design layout is not neat and attractive and/or information not logically organized according to the assignment criteria utilizing well-constructed bullet points. |
|
Slide Requirement |
3 points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
|
Adhered to required number of slides and includes a title slide, purpose statement slide, introduction slide, conclusion slide, and reference slide |
Adhered to required number of slides but omitted a title slide or purpose statement slide or introduction slide or citation(s) present on slide or conclusion slide or reference slide |
Did not adhere to the required number of slides and/or did not include a title slide, purpose statement slide, introduction slide, a conclusion slide, and reference slide |
Did not adhere to slide requirement or instructional rubric
|
|
Sources |
2 points |
1 point |
0.5 points |
0 points |
|
|
All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source. |
The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/historical source. |
Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5 years. |
Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5 years. |
|
Responses to Presentations |
2 points |
1 point |
|
0 points |
|
|
Final presentation posted on time and responded to the required number of presentations (not own) on the discussion board. |
Final presentation not posted and/or did not respond to the required number of presentations on the discussion board. |
|
No responses |
|
Kaltura Media |
2 points |
|
|
0 points |
|
|
Kaltura Media utilized |
|
|
Kaltura Media not utilized |
|
Earned Points |
||||
|
A reduction of up to 20% of the total points of assignment from the earned points is possible (instructor decides) for errors in APA (title slide, reference slide, citations, format, spelling, or grammar). |
||||
|
Final Total |
|
|
|
|
5.2.19