Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Report
Tggri2147
Assingment2Rubric.pdf
2/6/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921356&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881950&groupId=0… 1/4
Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Substandard Fa
Creation of
Balanced
Scorecard
with
assumptions
Creation of
5 points
Formatting and
development of Scorecard
was correct and
comprehensively explained.
Each element of the card
defined the assumptions
made to evaluate the
performance. Conclusions
drawn reflected a highly
accomplished level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and reasoning of
the case material and case
study facts resulting in
accurate, thorough, and
soundly reasoned
conclusions
(4.5-5.0)
4.25 points
Formatting and
development of
Scorecard was correct
and explained. Each
element of the card
defined the
assumptions made to
evaluate performance.
Conclusions drawn
reflected a good level
of analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reasoning of the case
material and case study
facts resulting in
accurate, and logically
reasoned
conclusions. However,
development of one or
two elements and or
assumptions were
not fully explained or
inaccurate.
(4.0-4.499)
3.75 points
Scorecard was
crated and all
elements were
present.
Comments identified
elements
and assumptions
made for
performance of each
supplier. Scorecard
was created but had
3-4 mistakes.
Comments reflect a
satisfactory level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reasoning of the
case material and
case study facts
resulting in partially
correct conclusions
that lack
development or
detail. Comments
tend to be
overbroad.
(3.5-3.999)
3.25 points
Attempt was made to
make a completed
scorecard. Scorecard
was
mostly inaccurate and
assumptions reflected
minimal analysis,
synthesis, evaluation
and reasoning of the
case material and
case study facts,
(3.0-3.499)
0
Sc
at
el
in
su
ju
th
Co
m
sy
an
ca
st
fa
co
(0
5 points 4.25 points 3.75 points 3.25 points 0
2/6/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921356&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881950&groupId=0… 2/4
TCO model
Attention to
Instructions
Formatting and
development of TCO was
correct and
comprehensively explained.
Each element of the model
was defined the
assumptions made to
evaluate the performance.
Conclusions drawn
reflected a highly
accomplished level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and reasoning of
the case material and case
study facts resulting in
accurate, thorough, and
soundly reasoned
conclusions
(4.5-5.0)
Formatting and
development of model
was correct
and explained. Each
element of the card
defined the
assumptions made to
evaluate the
performance.
Conclusions drawn
reflected a level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reasoning of the case
material and case study
facts resulting in
accurate, and soundly
reasoned conclusions
for each of the model
elements. Justification
for the reasoning was
for the most part good
but one or two of the
model step were not
detailed enough.
(4.0-4.499)
Comments generally
identify and explain
the model steps.
Comments reflect a
satisfactory level of
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reasoning of the
case material and
case study facts.
However some step
application
conclusions were in
partially correct and
or the conclusions
reflected a lack
development or
detailed
reasoning Comments
tend to be
overbroad.
(3.5-3.999)
Comments only
minimally identify
and explain the
model elements. The
level of analysis,
synthesis, evaluation
and reasoning of the
case material and
case study facts
however, was
inadequate due to
lack of supporting
class material and
case study facts.
(3.0-3.499)
Co
to
ex
m
or
ev
re
m
st
dr
(0
2 points
Demonstrates exceptional
understanding of
requirements responding
completely to each aspect
of assignment including
minor aspects of the
assignment such as using
1.7 points
Demonstrates
excellent
understanding of
requirements; missed
one minor aspect of
assignment.
(1.6-1.799)
1.5 points
Demonstrates
satisfactory
understanding of
requirements;
missed a key
element or two
1.3 points
Fails to show a firm
understanding of
requirements; missed
two key elements or
several minor aspects
of assignment
(1.2-1.399)
0
Fa
un
as
re
(0
2/6/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921356&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881950&groupId=0… 3/4
Writing
Mechanics
Adherence
to APA
Style (6th
ed.)
third person writing,
required use of course
readings, and assignment
format.
(1.8-2.0)
minor aspects of
assignment.
(1.4-1.599)
1.5 points
Strictly adheres to standard
usage rules of written
English, including but not
limited to capitalization,
punctuation, run-on
sentences, missing or extra
words, stylistic errors,
spelling and grammatical
errors. No errors found. No
contractions or jargon used.
(1.35 - 1.5)
1.28 points
Excellently adheres to
standard usage of
mechanics:
conventions of written
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. One to three
errors found.
(1.2 - 1.34)
1.13 points
Satisfactorily
adheres to standard
usage rules of
mechanics:
conventions of
English, including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. Four to 10
errors found.
(1.05 - 1.19)
0.98 points
Minimally adheres to
standard usage rules
of mechanics:
conventions of
written English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. More than
10 errors found.
(0.9 - 1.04)
0.
Do
st
of
co
En
in
er
to
(0
1.5 points
No APA style or usage
errors; Proper citation of
source material is used
throughout paper;
Reference titles follow APA
with only the first word, the
first word after a colon and
proper nouns capitalized.
(1.35 - 1.5)
1.28 points
Attempts in-text
citations and reference
list but one or two APA
style errors noted or
fails to use APA
citations when
appropriate 1-2 times.
(1.2 - 1.34)
1.13 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; APA
style errors are
noted throughout
document; Fails to
use APA citations
when appropriate 3
times in document.
(1.05 - 1.19)
0.98 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists; Fails
to use APA citation
when appropriate 4-5
times; or presents
only 1-2 in-text
citations and
reference list in a
paper that requires
APA citations
throughout the
document.
(0.9 - 1.04)
0
No
st
ei
or
om
(0
2/6/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921356&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881950&groupId=0… 4/4
Total / 15
Overall Score
Close
Outstanding 13.5 points minimum
Superior 12 points minimum
Good 10.5 points minimum
Substandard 9 points minimum
Failure 0 points minimum
