Final Paper for Legal Environment class

profileGoodwinGrad82
assignmentweek4.docx

Final paper

2

Running head: Final Paper Outline

Outline of Final Paper

J’kiwa T. Goodwin

Legal Environment

BUS670(MOD1923C)

Professor Jennifer Stephens

July 1st, 2019

1. Description of a business situation that presents a legal and ethical issues.

a. A manufacturer who failed to properly test a product that could have caused harm to its consumers and the environment.

b. Negligent torts are not deliberate; however, it is when an individual or entity fails to act as a reasonable person to someone to which they owe a duty to.

1. It is expected that the companies maintain a specific standard when manufacturing and or producing products that are being sold to the public.

2. A description of at least two ethical theories under which the situation will be analyzed.

a. Ethical absolutism an ethical philosophy tied in to the central idea that there are certain universal standards by which to measure morality and justice.

b. Ethical philosophy A set of beliefs about right and wrong that guides decision making both in individuals and in societies at large.

3. An explanation of the specific areas of law under which the situation will be analyzed

a. Strict Liability in Tort – “strict liability is a recently developed theory in law that holds manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers liable for defects in the design or manufacturing of products that render such products unreasonably dangerous to the intended users” (Seaquest, 2012).

Reference

Contributory Negligence as Defense to Actions Based on Statutes. (1912). Harvard Law

Review, 25(5), 463-465. doi:10.2307/1325593

Enderle, G. (2018). How can business ethics strengthen the social cohesion of a society? Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 619–629. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1007/s10551-016-3196-5

Foley, M., & Christensen, M. (2016). Negligence and the Duty of Care: A Case Study Discussion. Singapore Nursing Journal, 43(1), 7–11. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=119422609&site=eds-live&scope=site

Goldberg, J. C. P., & Zipursky, B. C. (2010). Torts : Torts. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy-library.ashford.edu

Goldberg, J. C. P., & Zipursky, B. C. (1998). The moral of MacPherson. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146(6), 1733. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.2307/3312738

Paliwal, M. (2006). Business ethics. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy-library.ashford.edu

PLUNKETT, J. C. (2015). The Historical Foundations of the Duty of Care. Monash University Law Review, 41(3), 716–744. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=116772848&site=eds-live&scope=site

Postema, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Philosophy and the law of torts. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy-library.ashford.edu

Rhee, R. J. (2013). The tort foundation of duty of care and business judgment. Notre Dame Law Review, (3). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbig&AN=edsbig.A330142810&site=eds-live&scope=site

Rosenthal, S. B., & Buchholz, R. A. (1999). Rethinking business ethics : A pragmatic approach. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy-library.ashford.edu

Salvador-Coderch, P., Garoupa, N., & Gomez-Liguerre, C. (2009). Scope of Liability: The Vanishing Distinction between Negligence and Strict Liability. European Journal of Law and Economics, 28(3), 257–287. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/10657

Seaquist, G. (2012). Business law for managers [Electronic version]. Retrieved from

https://content.ashford.edu/

United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (Links to an external site.)Links to an

external site.. (www.cpsc.gov/)