Nursing assignment due in 24

profileGurunanak@1
assignmenttoday.docx

I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: ASSESSING THE HEAD, EYES, EARS, NOSE, AND THROAT

This course will require you to complete a series of case studies using the i-Human Patients software application. The i-Human Patients (IHP) Case Player enables you to interact with virtual patients for the purpose of learning patient-assessment and diagnostic-reasoning skills. With IHP, you will be able to independently interview, examine, diagnose, and treat virtual patients and receive expert feedback on your performance. 

APRNs who are conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test. 

Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment. 

For this Assignment, you will examine an i-Human Patients case study. You will then work with an i-Human Patients patient with a condition of the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and/or throat. 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

· By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign an i-Human Patients case for this Assignment.  Note: Please see the  Course Announcements section of the classroom for your i-Human Patients Assignment. 

· Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients with conditions of the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and/or throat. 

· Access and review the assigned i-Human Patients case study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient. 

· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. 

· Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis. 

· Identify  three to five (3–5) possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. 

· Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis. 

· Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with conditions of the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and/or throat. 

Assignment

As you interact with this week’s i-Human Patients patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human Patients, refer to the  i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human Patients platform.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Upload your PDF from i-Human Patients to submit this Assignment. 

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK5Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

By submitting this Assignment, you confirm that you have complied with Walden University’s Code of Conduct including the expectations for academic integrity while completing the i-Human Patients Assessment. 

Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 5_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory: Complete an appropriate health history. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)

20 pts

Excellent

Achieves a score of 90–100%

15 pts

Good

Achieves a score of 80–89%

10 pts

Fair

Achieves a score of 70–79%

5 pts

Poor

Achieves a score of 60–69%

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Achieves a score of 59% or below

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhysical Exam: Complete an appropriate physical exam. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)

20 pts

Excellent

Achieves a score of 90–100%

15 pts

Good

Achieves a score of 80–89%

10 pts

Fair

Achieves a score of 70–79%

5 pts

Poor

Achieves a score of 60–69%

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Achieves a score of 59% or below

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation History of Present Illness: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent

Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good

4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair

3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor

1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation Subjective Data Document Current Medications, Review of System: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent

Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good

4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair

3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor

1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEMR Documentation Objective Data Document Physical Exam Findings: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Objective findings only

10 pts

Excellent

Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good

4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair

3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor

1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Findings: Organize the key findings with the most important first and least important last.

5 pts

Excellent

The key findings are complete and appropriately organized.

4 pts

Good

The key findings are complete but the organization is not correct.

3 pts

Fair

There are 1–2 key findings missing or organized inappropriately.

2 pts

Poor

There are 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

There are more than 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Statement: Document a brief and accurate problem statement using professional language that includes the following: 1.) Name or initials, age; 2.) Chief complaint; 3.) Positive and negative subjective findings; 4.) Positive and negative objective findings.

5 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

4 pts

Good

3 requirements are met.

3 pts

Fair

2 requirements are met.

2 pts

Poor

1 requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement Plan: Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent, comprehensive, evidenced-based management plan. Address the following criteria in the plan: 1.) Diagnostic tests; 2.) Medications (write out a complete order, even for OTC meds); 3.) Suggested consults/referrals; 4.) Patient education; 5.) Follow-up, including time interval and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner; 6.) Provide rationales for each intervention and include references to support your plan. Clinical practice guidelines should be utilized as applicable.

15 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

13 pts

Good

5 requirements are met.

10 pts

Fair

4 requirements are met.

7 pts

Poor

1-3 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Format: Current APA citations for references in management plan. Use of clinical practice guidelines when applicable.

5 pts

Excellent

0–1 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.

4 pts

Good

2–3 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.

3 pts

Fair

4–5 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.

2 pts

Poor

6–7 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors; clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next

image1.jpeg