NU560-8D-Unit 5 Discussion 2

profileForeveryng
AssignmentRubricDetailsclose.docx

Assignment Rubric Detailsclose

Rubric

NU560 Discussion Rubric 5.2

NU560 Discussion Rubric 5.2

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

NU560-CO1; NU560-CO2

6 pts

Level 5

Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates an exemplary understanding of course content and topic.

5.5 pts

Level 4

Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of course content and topic.

5 pts

Level 3

Initial post is missing one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a basic understanding of course content and topic.

4.5 pts

Level 2

Initial post is missing more than one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a limited understanding of course content and topic.

4 pts

Level 1

Initial post does not address discussion prompt elements, and/or does not demonstrate understanding of course content and topic and/or initial post is poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.

0 pts

Level 0

Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU560-CO1; NU560-CO2

6 pts

Level 5

The analysis of the topic includes breadth and depth, is aligned to the unit topic, relates to the course content and personal analysis is supported by exemplary references and examples.

5.5 pts

Level 4

The analysis of the topic is justified, and aligned to the unit topic, and personal analysis is supported by comprehensive references and/or examples.

5 pts

Level 3

There is a basic analysis of the topic and personal analysis is supported by basic references and/or examples.

4.5 pts

Level 2

There is minimal evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is supported by limited references and/or examples.

4 pts

Level 1

There is no evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is not supported by references and/or examples.

0 pts

Level 0

Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or analysis had no relationship to the topic and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaboration

6 pts

Level 5

Collaborates with fellow learners at an exemplary level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.

5.5 pts

Level 4

Collaborates with fellow learners at a comprehensive level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.

5 pts

Level 3

Collaborates with fellow learners at a basic level relating the discussion to some course concepts and extending the conversation with basic content and/or postings are not submitted on a minimum of 3 separate days.

4.5 pts

Level 2

Limited collaboration with fellow learners and makes little connection to course content and/or does not extend the conversation.

4 pts

Level 1

Collaborates with fellow learners but only one response post was submitted and/or response post(s) are poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.

0 pts

Level 0

No response posts were submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or there is no relationship between the response posts and the discussion prompts and/or one or more response posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-E

1 pts

Level 5

Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating exemplary scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent.

0.9 pts

Level 4

Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating comprehensive scholarly writing and/or have 1-2 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

0.8 pts

Level 3

Posts in this discussion are basic examples of scholarly writing and/or have 3 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

0.7 pts

Level 2

Posts in this discussion are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more errors in mechanics and/or grammar.

0.6 pts

Level 1

Posts in this discussion lack evidence of clear, organized scholarly writing. Errors interfere with reading and/or understanding of content.

0 pts

Level 0

Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-I

1 pts

Level 5

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style and formatting.

0.9 pts

Level 4

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

0.8 pts

Level 3

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 3-4 APA errors.

0.7 pts

Level 2

Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 5-6 APA errors.

0.6 pts

Level 1

Posts in this discussion do not provide sufficient in-text citations and/or references and/or have 7 or more APA errors.

0 pts

Level 0

Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.

1 pts

Total Points: 20