Annual Review Paper

profileRaven_23
AssignmentRubic.docx

Assignment: Annual Review

Criteria

Exemplary

100% A

Proficient

85% B

Fair

75% C

Meets Minimum Expectations

65% D

Unacceptable

0% F

1. Explain how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

Weight: 45%

Thoroughly explained how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

Satisfactorily explained how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

Partially explained how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

Insufficiently explained how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

Did not submit or incompletely explained how you will address Jim’s recent performance issues.

2. Suggest both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

Weight: 45%

Thoroughly suggested both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

Satisfactorily suggested both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

Partially suggested both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

Insufficiently suggested both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

Did not submit or incompletely suggested both constructive and positive feedback designed so that Jim will leave motivated to do his best.

3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

There are no mechanical, grammar spelling, punctuation, or stylistic errors.

There are several mechanical, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or stylistic errors.

There are some mechanical, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or stylistic errors.

There are many mechanical, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or stylistic errors.

Did not submit or is unreadable.