psychology 3
olubunmi24
assignmentpsychologyrubicCasestudyrubric1.docx
OPAIR – ver. 2015-2016 Template – Rubrics Page 7
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below Average |
Unsatisfactory |
Course Outcomes |
Measurable Outcomes |
|
Domain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation of presenting problem and background of client. 5 points |
Points: 5 |
Points: 4 |
Points: 3.5 |
Points: 2-1 |
Points: 0 |
4,7 |
2.3 |
|
|
Includes presenting problem and at least 5 relevant background issues. Cultural background included in relevant issues and importance explained
|
Includes presenting problem and at least 4relevant background issues, Cultural background included in relevant issues |
Includes presenting problem and at least 3 relevant background issues Cultural background merely mentioned in relevant issues
|
Includes presenting problem and 2 or fewer relevant background issues Cultural issues not mentioned in discussion |
No attempt to present an analysis of history and background (0 points) |
|
|
|
Presentation of Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis 30 points
|
Points: 30-27 |
Points: 26-24 |
Points: 23-21 |
Points: 20-18 |
Points: 17-0 |
3,5 |
6.2 |
|
|
Presents a thorough analysis of all 3 components identified; diagnosis is correct and supported by DSM evidence.
|
Presents a thorough analysis of at least 2 components; diagnosis is correct and supported by DSM evidence.
|
Presents a superficial analysis of some components; diagnosis is incorrect and not supported by DSM
|
Presents an incomplete analysis of components identified; diagnosis is incorrect and not supported by DSM
|
No attempt to present an analysis of components identified
|
|
|
|
Presentation of Theoretical Discussion 30 points |
Points: 30-27 |
Points: 26-24 |
Points: 23-21 |
Points: 20-18 |
Points: 17-0 |
1,6 |
|
|
|
Presents analysis of 3 theories; etiology and treatment included
|
Presents analysis of theories; etiology and treatment included
|
Presents analysis of 1 or 2 theories but omits some critical components (e.g. etiology or treatment)
|
Mentions only 1 theory. Omits critical components (e.g. etiology or treatment) |
No attempt to present an analysis of components identified
|
|
|
|
Use of peer-reviewed sources 3 articles 15 points (multiple points by 3) |
Points: 5 |
Points: 4 |
Points: 3.5 |
Points: 2-1 |
Points: 0 |
2,8 |
4.1.4.2 |
|
|
Journal is peer-reviewed; article is data-driven and used to support the paper assertions |
Journal is peer-reviewed; article is data-driven and used but does not support assertion |
Journal is peer-reviewed but only mentioned in body of essay or not data-driven |
Journal is peer-reviewed but only in reference list |
No peer-reviewed journal used |
|
|
|
Student demonstrated academic writing skills 10 points |
Points: 10-9 |
Points: 8 |
Points: 7 |
Points: 6 |
Points: 5-0 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
No more than 6 grammatical and spelling errors*; language is appropriate for college level, academic paper |
No more than 8 grammatical and spelling errors: language is somewhat appropriate for college level academic paper |
No more than 10 grammatical and spelling errors: language is somewhat appropriate for college level academic paper |
No more than 12 grammatical and spelling errors: language is not appropriate for college level academic paper (slang, etc. used) |
No evidence of standard English |
|
|
|
Student demonstrates use of correct APA format 10 points |
Points: 10-9 |
Points: 8 |
Points: 7 |
Points: 6 |
Points: 5-0 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
All 4 elements in APA format with no more than 1 errors* |
All 4 elements in APA format with no more than 2 errors |
All elements in APA format with no more than 3 errors |
All elements in APA format with no more than 4 errors |
Not in APA format |
|
|
