Project Risk Management

profileMona78
AssignmentInstructions.doc.rtf

Part 1 Instructions

See the attached file for the instructor provided project. This includes a draft scope statement and the WBS/Estimate/Schedule.  

Read through the attached documents.  

For this assignment submission, since you have been given a scope statement, (1) prepare a short summary of the project, (2) what success looks like for the project and (3) what challenges might get in the way of the project being successful.  

This includes reviewing (1) the MPP and (2) identifying the WBS, resourcing, and critical path schedule to note how these may affect the project's success.

Part 2 Instructions

Week 1 Learning Objectives

Articulate the value and benefits of creating an effective approach to planning for project risk management

Create a risk management plan to determine how both positive and negative risks will be identified, analyzed and managed

Essential Components

This assignment provides the opportunity to review risk management practices and the Risk Management Plan.

  • The Risk Management Plan is typically the first risk deliverable created in a project – and is the agreement to the approach for risk work for the project. However, since we have not yet reviewed the risk management tool/s techniques that would be integrated in this document, it is difficult to write it this week. For this week, we will create an awareness of this deliverable. As we go through the term and discus these different tools/ techniques, it is then possible to detail out this deliverable. Each week, based on our topics, continue to build this RMP - you will then submit the completed Risk Management Plan at the end of Week 5 for comprehensive feedback - remember, typically this would be built first and then guide the work we will do in Weeks 2 - 4. Instead, this term, we are practicing the risk work and then using that knowledge to "reverse engineer" the RMP. Hope this makes sense and reach out with any questions.

  • For this week, you will review the Risk Management Plan through the perspective of your project.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) template is provided as a framework.

  • At this point, we have not covered the tools that would be integrated into this plan – for this assignment, for each section of the RMP template provide a sentence or two as to what would be included in the section, how it will support the risk work for the project. and how it adds value to risk management work for the project.
  • Refer to Rubric for grading guidelines

  • Use the readings and topics covered in class as a checklist to ensure that all the key elements are considered.
  • Assignment Rubric

    Category

    Above Standard

    Meets Standards

    Approaching Standards

    Below Standards

    Not Evident

    Assignment requirements (70%)

    Goes well above the requirements of the assignment.

    Provides new

    Goes above the minimum requirements of the assignment

    Meets minimum assignment requirements

    Meets some assignment requirements

    Does not meet the requirements of the assignment.

    information, tools,

    and/or techniques

    Critical Thinking

    Professional insights

    Comprehensive

    Includes an explanation

    Includes a general

    Does not explain the

    (15%)

    into depth and breadth

    explanation of the

    of the issue;

    explanation of the issue

    issue; does not explore

    of assignment - goes

    issue; exploration of

    exploration of expert

    but is vague or is not

    expert viewpoints or

    WELL beyond

    expert viewpoints and

    viewpoints and use of

    clearly linked to the

    use evidence to inform

    assignment

    use of evidence to

    evidence to inform

    identified risks;

    interpretation and

    requirements to

    inform interpretation

    interpretation and

    includes some

    analysis; does not

    explore risks and/or

    and analysis; thorough

    analysis; includes an

    exploration of expert

    provide an evaluation

    relevant new

    evaluation of the

    evaluation of the

    viewpoints and use of

    of the context

    techniques.

    context (historical,

    context (historical,

    evidence to inform

    (historical, ethical,

    ethical, cultural,

    ethical, cultural,

    interpretation and

    cultural, environmental

    environmental or

    environmental or

    analysis; includes a

    or circumstantial

    circumstantial

    circumstantial

    general evaluation of

    settings), and self and

    settings), and self and

    settings), and self and

    the context (historical,

    others’ assumptions

    others’ assumptions

    others’ assumptions

    ethical, cultural,

    and perspectives when

    and perspectives when

    and perspectives when

    environmental or

    stating a position;

    stating a position; well-

    stating a position;

    circumstantial

    conclusions are not

    informed conclusions

    conclusions are based

    settings), and self and

    based on prioritized

    based on methodically

    on methodically

    others’ assumptions

    evidence and

    and perspectives when

    perspectives.

    stating a position, but

    prioritized evidence and perspectives.

    prioritized evidence and perspectives.

    lack specificity; conclusions are based on prioritized evidence and perspectives.

    Communication (10%) (includes grammar and clarity)

    Goes well beyond assignment requirements to communicate information in a precise, insightful and professional manner.

    Assignment is well organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. High quality grammar. No misspellings.

    Assignment is organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. High quality grammar. No misspellings.

    Assignment is well organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. Good quality grammar. Minor misspellings.

    Assignment is not organized. It is not evident to reader what is contained in each section of report. Low quality grammar, misspellings.

    Formatting

    Virtually no errors in

    Rare errors in

    Some errors in

    Multiple errors in

    Does not submit

    (5%)

    formatting, citations,

    formatting, citations,

    formatting, citations,

    formatting, citations,

    assignment materials

    NOTE: Gross

    or references.

    or references.

    or references.

    or references.

    in APA 6 format.

    failure to

    provide

    PROPER

    citations and

    references –

    particularly

    with regard to

    direct quotes –

    will result in

    sanctions as

    outlined in the

    academic

    honesty policy