Project Risk Management
Part 1 Instructions
See the attached file for the instructor provided project. This includes a draft scope statement and the WBS/Estimate/Schedule.
Read through the attached documents.
For this assignment submission, since you have been given a scope statement, (1) prepare a short summary of the project, (2) what success looks like for the project and (3) what challenges might get in the way of the project being successful.
This includes reviewing (1) the MPP and (2) identifying the WBS, resourcing, and critical path schedule to note how these may affect the project's success.
Part 2 Instructions
Week 1 Learning Objectives
Articulate the value and benefits of creating an effective approach to planning for project risk management
Create a risk management plan to determine how both positive and negative risks will be identified, analyzed and managed
Essential Components
This assignment provides the opportunity to review risk management practices and the Risk Management Plan.
- The Risk Management Plan is typically the first risk deliverable created in a project – and is the agreement to the approach for risk work for the project. However, since we have not yet reviewed the risk management tool/s techniques that would be integrated in this document, it is difficult to write it this week. For this week, we will create an awareness of this deliverable. As we go through the term and discus these different tools/ techniques, it is then possible to detail out this deliverable. Each week, based on our topics, continue to build this RMP - you will then submit the completed Risk Management Plan at the end of Week 5 for comprehensive feedback - remember, typically this would be built first and then guide the work we will do in Weeks 2 - 4. Instead, this term, we are practicing the risk work and then using that knowledge to "reverse engineer" the RMP. Hope this makes sense and reach out with any questions.
- For this week, you will review the Risk Management Plan through the perspective of your project.
A Risk Management Plan (RMP) template is provided as a framework.
Refer to Rubric for grading guidelines
Assignment Rubric
Category
Above Standard
Meets Standards
Approaching Standards
Below Standards
Not Evident
Assignment requirements (70%)
Goes well above the requirements of the assignment.
Provides new
Goes above the minimum requirements of the assignment
Meets minimum assignment requirements
Meets some assignment requirements
Does not meet the requirements of the assignment.
information, tools,
and/or techniques
Critical Thinking
Professional insights
Comprehensive
Includes an explanation
Includes a general
Does not explain the
(15%)
into depth and breadth
explanation of the
of the issue;
explanation of the issue
issue; does not explore
of assignment - goes
issue; exploration of
exploration of expert
but is vague or is not
expert viewpoints or
WELL beyond
expert viewpoints and
viewpoints and use of
clearly linked to the
use evidence to inform
assignment
use of evidence to
evidence to inform
identified risks;
interpretation and
requirements to
inform interpretation
interpretation and
includes some
analysis; does not
explore risks and/or
and analysis; thorough
analysis; includes an
exploration of expert
provide an evaluation
relevant new
evaluation of the
evaluation of the
viewpoints and use of
of the context
techniques.
context (historical,
context (historical,
evidence to inform
(historical, ethical,
ethical, cultural,
ethical, cultural,
interpretation and
cultural, environmental
environmental or
environmental or
analysis; includes a
or circumstantial
circumstantial
circumstantial
general evaluation of
settings), and self and
settings), and self and
settings), and self and
the context (historical,
others’ assumptions
others’ assumptions
others’ assumptions
ethical, cultural,
and perspectives when
and perspectives when
and perspectives when
environmental or
stating a position;
stating a position; well-
stating a position;
circumstantial
conclusions are not
informed conclusions
conclusions are based
settings), and self and
based on prioritized
based on methodically
on methodically
others’ assumptions
evidence and
and perspectives when
perspectives.
stating a position, but
prioritized evidence and perspectives.
prioritized evidence and perspectives.
lack specificity; conclusions are based on prioritized evidence and perspectives.
Communication (10%) (includes grammar and clarity)
Goes well beyond assignment requirements to communicate information in a precise, insightful and professional manner.
Assignment is well organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. High quality grammar. No misspellings.
Assignment is organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. High quality grammar. No misspellings.
Assignment is well organized, and the format can be followed. It is evident to reader what is contained in each section of the report. Good quality grammar. Minor misspellings.
Assignment is not organized. It is not evident to reader what is contained in each section of report. Low quality grammar, misspellings.
Formatting
Virtually no errors in
Rare errors in
Some errors in
Multiple errors in
Does not submit
(5%)
formatting, citations,
formatting, citations,
formatting, citations,
formatting, citations,
assignment materials
NOTE: Gross
or references.
or references.
or references.
or references.
in APA 6 format.
failure to
provide
PROPER
citations and
references –
particularly
with regard to
direct quotes –
will result in
sanctions as
outlined in the
academic
honesty policy