|
Category
|
Beginning
0-5 points
|
Developing
5-10 points
|
Accomplished
10-15 points
|
Exemplary
15-20 points
|
|
Thesis and Support
|
The writing may need a more clearly articulated thesis and/or appropriate related subordinate ideas. Fuzzy logic may be evident and adequate supporting evidence is lacking.
|
The writing has a clear thesis and related subordinate ideas supported by clear thinking and appropriate evidence. Logical arguments may be one-sided or incomplete.
|
The writing has a clearly articulated thesis supported by appropriate evidence and sound logic. Minor gaps in logic and argument may appear.
|
The writing has a clearly articulated original thesis and subordinate ideas supported by reliable and relevant evidence based on original research.
|
|
Organization
|
The writing is noticeably lacking in organization. There is no clear introduction nor conclusion and ideas are neither carefully nor fully developed. Supporting evidence is clearly lacking.
|
The writing demonstrates rudimentary organization and logical structure, but ideas may be more fully developed and supported by more appropriate evidence.
|
The writing is organized logically and flows well. An introduction and conclusion are evident, but transitions may be smoother.
|
The writing flows smoothly and logically from a well-defined thesis. It contains an appropriate introduction, conclusion, and smooth transitions.
|
|
Style
|
The writing lacks clarity and is sometimes confusing. The language chosen is not appropriate to the subject nor the assignment.
|
The writing is clear but could be expressed in a style more appropriate to the subject. It is jargon-free but may require a more complete explanation of some terms used.
|
The writing keeps the reader’s attention through a carefully crafted prose style Language chosen is appropriate to the subject, but may call attention to itself in minor ways.
|
The writing engages the reader through an original prose style appropriate to the subject. Language is precise. Sentences are varied but not noticeably so. Active voice is apparent.
|
|
Mechanics/Syntax/Grammar
|
The writing exhibits substantial errors in grammar and style so that the basic ideas are lost. Sources are overly quoted and not adequately documented nor cited.
|
The writing could benefit from additional proofreading, as some errors impede the flow of the reading. Sources are documented and cited but need to show greater consistency.
|
The writing may exhibit a few minor errors in grammar or style, but do impair the flow of the reading. Most quoted material is properly documented and cited.
|
The writing is free of grammatical, proofreading, and stylistic errors. All quoted material is properly documented and cited.
|
|
APA format
|
There are no resources cited.
|
References and in-text citations are included, but both are formatted incorrectly.
|
Either References or in-text citations are formatted incorrectly, or too much of the content is quoted or paraphrased, resulting in little original work.
|
References and in-text citations are included, appropriate and formatted correctly. Enough of the content is created by the student.
|