For KateTutor
RESEARCH II Grade Sheet
Agency Assessment Paper Part I Description of the Program
Name of Student _________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.An overview of the program (Heading) |
|
|
|
2. History of the organization? |
|
3. Mission statement in the organization |
|
4. Organization Structure |
|
5. History of the program within the organization |
|
6. Program’s rationale / definition. General purpose of the program |
|
7..Social problems addressed by the Program (Explain in full detail with statistics) (Heading)- 1pg. |
|
8.Intervention Methods (Heading) |
|
|
|
9. Methods proposed to achieve the program’s results |
|
10. Theories that underlie the proposed Interventions |
|
11.Logic within the program in using these interventions to achieve its goals |
|
12 Describe the length of services |
|
13.Program Funding and Cost – cost per day in hospice in New Jersey. |
|
(Subheadings) |
|
14. Method for Program Funding (Public, private, state, federal, or Local money? Public or private Organization/) This is a private company |
|
|
|
15.Characteristics of the staff providing services –(Heading) |
|
|
|
16.Professional and non-professional staff Role and credentials (What are professional and non- professional staff background? Are they trained in the type of intervention being utilized by the program? What are the professionals’ perspectives on the model of intervention being utilized? |
|
17.What standardized method is used to evaluate the staff performance and client satisfaction? (Provide SAMPLEs) |
|
Implementation issues – (Heading) |
|
(Subheadings) |
|
18. Successes and Challenges in the program? |
|
19.Do the intervention methods seem appropriate? |
|
20. Are people coming for services? |
|
21.Are they the types of clients expected to come? |
|
22.Has the amount of outreach work been underestimated and has this delayed program implementation? |
|
|
Conclusion: The students demonstrate knowledge and skills by writing a summary of the evaluation process. Describe the successes and limitations of the program and the difficulties you encountered in writing this paper? What do they think needs to be changed in order to enhance this program? How would implement these changes? How does this program evaluation paper relate to social work policy, practice and research?