ENG 111
Assignment/paper comments
Since extensive comments were given on the first draft of the paper, the revised papers receive very few, if any, comments. The new grade will replace the old grade. Grades 25 and below have major citation issues or the paper did not meet or follow the requirements in the syllabus, instructions, or in Canvas. Grades 60 and below usually are caused by citation issues. The highest grade a paper can receive with citation issues is a 60.
I would like you to sign up for a little extra help at one of TCC's writing centers, learning success centers, and/or virtual tutoring services, especially for help with MLA citation. This is not bad, nor is it a punishment, but I just want to make sure that you do well in the course. If I am not on campus, a writing center, a student success center, a learning success center, a librarian, or a tutor are the next best options. Again, this is not bad, but I want to make sure that you get the best grade out of the course and do well on all the assignments.
Paper had many significant citation issues.
Unknown formats on the WC page. Database article citation? Why is a date in parentheses? Why is a volume after an article title? Cortez, Elif Kiesow, ed. “Data Protection around the World: Privacy Laws in Action.” Vol. 33. Springer Nature. (2020).
-Improper Works Cited page...consult MLA Guide or the Simon and Schuster handbook chapter 26 for proper citation rules and formats…see page 346 for the example of the proper format and page 300 for the list of proper citation formats for individual sources. Also, old and/or outdated MLA formats, which have not been used in over five years, are no long valid or acceptable. Current MLA format must be used. Lastly, copying raw or example citation information into a paper is not creating a proper MLA citation.
-Works Cited should be centered and written at the top. Do not use bibliography, references, sources, works cited page, or works consulted…only Works Cited. Also, do not bold, underline, italicize, use quotation marks around, change the font size of, or put a period or colon after Works Cited. The Works Cited page should start on its own page.
-Capitalize first letters of all major words in a title, even if they do not.
-Citations with unknown formats or outdated formats cannot be given credit. This can happen when chapter 26 in the Handbook for Writers with the gold seal is not used, old and outdated formats are used, any other citation other than an official MLA guide is used, when an automatic citation generator is used, a student creates their own citation without using the book, when one copies raw citation information into a Works Cited page without formatting it correctly, when instructions are not followed concerning citation, and/or when another form of citation is used, for example, APA citation, which is not the same as MLA citation. For the Works Cited page assignment in ENG 111, this can happen when instructions are not followed about which citations to do, it can happen when someone tries to cite, for example, an online anthology when an actual physical anthology was assigned, and/or if the citation is just randomly made up without format, has mixed formats, is just invented by guessing, or is a different format than what was assigned, for example, using a regular web page model citation to create an article in a scholarly journal with a print version database source citation. Please use chapter 26 in Use the Handbook for Writers to create citations. Make sure that the book has a gold seal on it stating: New! 2016 MLA Updates.
-vol. for the number, not volume and number or volume. issue number
Example: vol. 21, no. 3, not 21.3…also, no big V
-no. for the issue number, not issue and number or volume. issue number
Example: vol. 21, no. 3, not 21.3…also, no big N
-volume, issue, year of publication, page range, not date, volume, issue, page range for citation 2
-use pp. for a page range, not p. Do not include the number of pages. Only include the page range.
-Database name missing or improper on the database sources… JSTOR is the database name in the example citation for number 2. JSTOR is not the name of the company that owns the database, so do not put EBSCOhost. Use the name of the specific database that you are in. Do not just type JSTOR. After the database name comes the DOI number or web address.
-DOI number or web address missing from the database citations.
-The whole Works Cited page should be in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, even the quotation marks and web addresses
-Double-space the whole Works Cited page…one blank line between each line, not two. No extra wide spacing anywhere in a paper, including the heading, body, and WC page. No extra wide space between Works Cited and the citations.
Why are random numbers in citation?
Ex: 7.3-4 (2020): 135.
The paper is too long. No matter how long a paper is, if the citations are not correct, the length does not matter.
The paper is too long. No more than three pages. Focus on quality over quantity.
-better title needed. Using only one or two words makes for a topic that is too broad, and one should just not announce the subject or be the name of the assignment.
-better title needed. Titles should be dramatic and informative. Remember, the title is the first thing someone reads before he/she starts reading your paper. The title should also not sound like an announcement, should not be the type of paper, and should not have character names in it.
-only one space should be used between the parts of the heading, the heading and title, and the title and the first paragraph (see page 341)
-No extra wide spaces between paragraphs. Open the paragraph tab and place a check in the box where it asks if you want an extra space between paragraphs of the same style
-Do not state, explain, discuss, argue, refute, or quote the obvious. Examples: There are 100 pennies in a dollar, America is a country, Walmart is a popular store, smoking is bad, drinking and driving is dangerous, marijuana is a drug, and abortion is the termination of a fetus. Announcing that a topic is a controversial topic or a debate in an argument paper is also explaining the obvious. Explaining that things happen in the world is obvious…we only live on one planet. Do not pad the paper with statements or explanations of the obvious. Statements of the obvious will be deducted from the length of the paper. Take out all statements of the obvious.
-Do not repeat the same idea in different ways. Explain the idea once and move on. Unnecessary repetition will be deducted from the length of the paper. Do not pad the paper with repeated information or unnecessarily long sentences. Unnecessary repetition is also a bit insulting, especially in a short paper, because it implies that the audience cannot remember what was written.
-Do not artificially pad papers with sentences and words. If three words will do, do not use ten. If one sentence will do, do not use five sentences. Artificially paper padding and fluffing is not acceptable in academic papers. Artificial padding and fluffing will be deducted from the length of the paper. Every sentence should be packed with critical detail and explanation. Lastly, repeating the same ideas and explaining the obvious are also artificially padding a paper. Unnecessary repetition and explanations of the obvious will be deducted from the length of the paper.
Do not announce or say that people argue. Just quote the arguments.
A quote? a quote introduction
Missing critical introduction
Missing quotation marks
Missing intext citation
According to the Fourth Amendment, searches and seizures must be reasonable, and public safety constitutes a reasonable cause for limited privacy intrusions. Proponents state that the government has the authority to enact regulations that serve the public interest, even if they impose some limits on individual privacy(period) as Cortez (101) states that…
All quoted?
Who is quoted?
1,2,3 or more quotes run together?
Missing critical introductions
Missing quotation marks around what are not your words
Why is (101) in the middle of the sentences? Is it an intext citation?
Do not quote parts of sentences or fragments. Quote whole sentences and ideas.
According to the Fourth Amendment, searches and seizures must be reasonable, and public safety constitutes a reasonable cause for limited privacy intrusions. Proponents state that the government has the authority to enact regulations that serve the public interest, even if they impose some limits on individual privacy as Cortez (101) states that “this right is not an absolute right” in reference to individual privacy rights. This perspective emphasizes that privacy concerns should not override the necessity to protect public safety. Moreover, data handling protocols can ensure that mental health records are used solely for the purpose of background checks and not for any other governmental intrusion. Proper data protection measures, such as encrypting sensitive information and restricting access to authorized personnel, can effectively address privacy concerns while ensuring that individuals with significant mental health issues are prevented from accessing firearms as “prohibiting the mentally ill from owning firearms” is considered effective in gun control laws (Smith and Spiegler 3).
The audience knows what it highlights because the audience just read it.
Improper and/or missing MLA Documentation
Below is some information about proper MLA Citation:
-For MLA citations, you have to create a Works Cited page at the end of the paper that has the complete citation list. In the body of the paper, you have to critically introduce a quote, put quotation marks around it, and use an in-text citation, which is placed at the end of the sentence and looks like this (Smith 42) or (American Cancer 42). Smith would be the author's name, and 42 would be the page number. American Cancer, being The American Cancer Society, would be the online source's name, and again, 42 would be the page number the quote or information was taken from. If I see (Smith 42) in the body of the paper, then that will refer me to the Works Cited page, at the end of the paper, where the full citation is written out. Here is an example of a proper quote and an in-text citation in the body of a paper: According to Douglass Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, “the answer to the ultimate question is 42” (166). You could also write: “The answer to the ultimate question is 42,” according to Douglass Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (166). Both are acceptable and correct. However, if you do not introduce your source, you must place the author’s last name and the page number or paragraph number in the in-text citation. For instance: According to the author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, “The answer to the ultimate question is 42” (Adams 166). I would prefer the former to the latter. One must always preface a quote or tell where it came from, put quotation marks around what is quoted, and then place the author's last name and page number in brackets with a period at the end. The only difference when paraphrasing is that you do not use the quotation marks, but you must still introduce the quote and use an in-text citation. Do not do this (Smith, 42). Do not place a comma in the in-text citation. Lastly, if there is no author, use the first word or two of the citation on the Works Cited page to create an in-text citation. Look at the left-hand side of the screen or page when looking at your Works Cited page. The author’s last name or the title of the source should be there. Use the author’s last name and page or paragraph number: example (Smith 42) or (Smith p.4). For a source with no author that begins with a title, say the American Heart Association, use the first word or two of the title ( American 42) or (“American” p.4). If the title is in quotation marks or italics on the Works Cited page, carry them over to the in-text citation. One should be able to see an in-text citation and easily scan the left side of a Works Cited page to see which source is being quoted. All quotes in the body should have a corresponding full citation on the Works Cited page. All full citations on a Works Cited page should have a corresponding critical introduction, quote in quotation marks, and in-text citation in the body of a paper. (Remember, there is no paraphrasing or summary allowed in the course…only direct quotation is accepted)
75% of a paper must be written in your own words. Quotation should be used to support ideas, but it should not be used to write most of the paper.
-Use your quotations to support your ideas, not to write the paper for you. For example, begin and end paragraphs with your own words, only use a quoted sentence or two in the middle of a paragraph, and then say something in your own words about your quotation. Also, do not run quotes together without saying something between them. You can agree with, disagree with, add to, subtract from, or interpret the quotation. You do not want a series of linked quotes that write the paper for you. In other words, do not simply write the first and last sentences of a paragraph in your words and have the rest of the body sentences being quotation. Seventy five percent of a paper should be written in your words. Remember, it is your paper, so it should mostly be written in your own words.
-improper citation...I do not know which are your words and which are not due to improper and/or lack of citation. There is no paraphrasing or summary allowed in this course. Only direct quotation is acceptable.
Say something in your own words about your quotation. You can agree with, disagree with, add to, subtract from, or interpret the quotation. Do not simply move on or into another quote. A quote is not just another sentence in a paper. In an argument appear, you have to agree or disagree with what a quote said and go into critical detail and explanation about why the information in a quote is logical or illogical. Do not just repeat what the quote said.
Whenever you quote someone, always try to say something critical in your own words about the quote. You should always try to interpret, explain, add to, subtract from, agree with, disagree with, point out faulty logic, or show the reasoning behind a quote. Try not to link too many quotes together. Use quotation for support, but do not let it write or dominate parts of your paper. Always place a critical comment after a quote. Say something about the information in the quote. Do not just go right into another quote or idea. Do not just repeat what the quote said.
-always say something about a quotation before moving on to a different topic, subject, or other quote. Always make critical comment on a quote. Never leave a quotation hanging, and never expect the quote to speak for itself.
-when quoting, always introduce a quote, use quotation marks around the quoted words, and place an in-text citation at the end of the sentence. This must be done in order to protect yourself from accidental plagiarism due to improper citation.
This is a number, not an argument for or against MHBC, mental health background checks
In the CDC’s report, “In 2020, 79% of all homicides and 53% of all suicides involved firearms” (Kegler 2).
- Avoid quoting numbers and statistics that do not have explanations. They are just numbers. Quote explanations and arguments. Say this was a quote: “350000 abortions happen in the U.S. each year.” This number is just a number. It may be big to some, small, or be reasonable to others. Also, this quote does not say, explain, argue, or refute. There are no reasons given and no logic provided as to why abortion should be legal or illegal or if it is moral or immoral. Polls, surveys, what many people believe or do not believe or feel or do not feel, big or small numbers, large or small statistics are not explanations, arguments, facts, reasons, or refutations. If numbers or statistics are quoted, the quote should also explain in specific detail why the numbers matter, what the significance of the numbers is, or why and how the numbers are important. Otherwise, numbers are just numbers and statistics are just statistics, usually being cited to emotionally manipulate an audience. Quote detailed, specific explanations and arguments, not just numbers or statistics.
No, it does not. It is just numbers without context, argument, or explanation
Of great concern, this figure captures the position of firearms in the lives of the suicidal.
More critical approach needed
Unclear meaning, wording, and logic
Guns are a more efficient and less reversible approach to dying, which is why access control is essential.
Who? Never heard of them
Missing critical introduction…full names, credentials, and article title needed
Why is there a number after their names?
Missing comma
Missing intext citation
Why is there a dash at the end of the quote?
Do not add your own words to the quote.
In research carried out by Pallin and Barnhorst (1), it was established that the(comma) “odds of dying by suicide are more than 3 times higher for those with access to firearms compared to those without access” – this points at the link between guns and suicide rates.
Unclear wording, meaning, and logic
Therefore, it can be possible for the authorities to identify the patients who are likely to harm themselves and ensure that they are not granted access to firearms in a bid to reduce on suicides.
-Do not refer to your own paper in the paper, explain why the topic or points are important to write about, refer to a quote by saying this quote says or this quote means, or announce how the paper will be written or organized.
-Do not announce or speak to the audience directly. Stay in 3rd person, stay in past tense, and be objective. Do not write in present tense. You should not be in the paper or be speaking directly to the audience in the paper. The voice of the author should not be heard in the paper. Papers should not sound or read like lectures. Do not add personal opinion or commentary into the paper. Also, not including enough specific detail and description can lead to a paper that has vague, unclear, general announcements without specific meanings. In a story, just say what the characters are doing, but do not put in personal opinion or feelings about the characters or topic. Also, do not announce what is happening. Just show the story. For instance, Jim liked doing things is not showing a story. Should be: Jim smiled while he reeled in a seven-pound trout. In an exemplification or argument paper, do not say: the reason is…, or this is because…, or one can agree/disagree because…In argument, do not just say you agree or disagree or just summarize what a quote said in a general statement. Argue, explain, and refute in critical detail, using critical explanation to talk about the information and ideas in the quotes. Do not just say, Dr. Susan Smith was correct or one agrees with her. Moreover, do not announce that information is important, crucial, essential, a good example, or that the paper contains data or research. In addition, do not refer to your own paper in the paper with statements saying ‘this quote means’ or ‘this essay is about,’ along with not announcing what a quote said after the quote. Lastly, do not just make a statement. For example, do not say: The death penalty is wrong. You have to explain, argue, or refute in specific detail, not just announce a view.
Stop saying things are important
No, it is not important to note because it is obvious.
Stop announcing
It is also important to note that some of the school shooters had some symptoms of mental illness prior to the shooting
Missing critical introduction
Missing intext citation
2013 was over ten years ago….what about today? Use current research.
According to Metzl et al. (83), there is “a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) study of 63 active-shooter incidents between 2000 and 2013 that found that 25% of shooters were known to have been diagnosed with a mental illness of some kind.”
Take out
The sentence after this makes the argument
Such a connection between mental health and acts of violence means that prevention is necessary.
Critical introduction needed. A journal is just a place to publish articles. Introduce the author, their credentials, and the name of the study or article.
Journal names should be italicized
Missing comma
The source has no page 1
The point was already supported and explained by a previous quote…do not repeat
Moreover, a study published in the Journal of Threat Assessment and Management established that(comma) “approximately two‐thirds of public mass shooters exhibit signs of mental illness” (Lankford and Cowan 1).
Take out
Do not explain what you are trying to do in a paper
This strengthens the argument for thorough background checks to identify possible threats before they escalate to acts of violence.
Already stated previously almost word for word
However, privacy rights are not absolute and can be reasonably limited to protect public safety.
Missing critical introduction
Is (134) an intext citation? Why is it after the critical introduction?
Missing intext citation
This is not a critical argument or explanation
Do not use quotes with capitalization issues or errors
According to Cortez (134), “the constitution should balance individual rights with the public interest or national interest.”
Stop saying things are highlighted
Stop making announcements after quotes
Missing critical introduction
Missing comma
Quote is an unclear fragment
As noted by legal experts, effective data protection protocols can(comma) “prevent harm to individuals from wrongful collection or misuse of their personal information” (Raul 44).
Stop saying people argue and just quote their arguments
Just quote it
Stop announcing
However, substantial evidence contradicts this claim.
Same mechanical issues as the previous quotes
Missing introduction
The quote does not explain why or how?
The effectiveness of these measures is further supported by a Policy Studies Journal study that concluded that, “stricter gun control laws decrease gun-related deaths” (Smith and Spiegler 5).
-Do not announce conclusions with ‘in conclusion,’ ‘in summary,’ ‘in closing,’ or in any other way. The audience can see that it is the last paragraph. Also, a paper should naturally feel like it is coming to an end without any prompting.