case study
Assessment 2: Case Study-2
|
Due date: |
Week 12 |
|
Group/individual: |
Individual |
|
Word count / Time provided: |
2500 |
|
Weighting: |
30% |
|
Unit Learning Outcomes: |
ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 |
Assessment Details:
The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, system development approaches, data modelling, IS project management, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance.
This assessment allows students to apply theoretical concepts to practice by analyzing case studies and proposing a suitable design. The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, system development approaches, data Modeling, IS project management, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance.
Case Study: Online System for Kangaroo Taxi
Kangaroo Taxi is a new company in Australia, offering online booking services for their users. Kangaroo Taxi is about to launch an easy-to-use website allowing its users to access from smartphones. The website will enable the users to plan and book their trip. Upon the first use, users would be able to enter their details into the system, including their means of payments (e.g., credit card, PayPal, etc.). This will allow the users to use the Kangaroo Taxi in any subsequent bookings as well. Users can simply log in to their registered accounts and make a booking for a taxi by entering their pickup and destination address. The system will provide them with an estimated cost according to this information.
Suppose you are asked to develop this online system for Kangaroo Taxi. You have been given only three weeks to come up with a blueprint of the system design. After that, you will be presenting your design to a team of consultants. The online system should perform several activities such as adding or creating a new user, checking for available taxis and drivers in the area requested by the customer, calculating the cost of a trip, issuing an online ticket or receipt and processing all bookings transactions. In addition, you may add any other functions for this system.
Tasks:
1. Draw use case description for registering accounts and making a booking.
1. Draw use case diagram.
1. Identify all entities and their attribute and draw an E-R (Entity-Relationship) diagram.
1. Draw the class diagram.
1. Draw a Sequence diagram.
1. Draw activity diagram.
1. Design a data entry screen for entering membership details.
1. Design a booking taxi input screen that includes the date, time, pickup and destination address, type of the service, passenger name, contact number and payment methods. Plan suitable testing and deployment activities.
if you believe that you need to make additional assumptions, clearly state them for each situation *You can use Microsoft Visio or Microsoft Word to present your design.
Assignment Format
|
Submission: |
|
Only through Canvas |
|
Length: |
|
2500 words max (+ or – 10%) |
|
Font size: |
|
12pt (min) Times Roman |
|
Line spacing: |
|
1.5 or double line spacing |
|
Cover sheet: |
|
APIC standard coversheet |
|
Referencing: |
|
Use Harvard referencing only |
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark.
|
Marking Criteria |
Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) |
Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark |
Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark |
Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark |
Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark |
|
Introduction (5%) |
Poor introduction with irrelevant details |
Introduction is presented briefly and is missing the report outline |
Introduction is generally presented along with the report outline |
Introduction is well written, and the report outline is also discussed |
Introduction is very well written, and the report outline is also discussed |
|
Use Case description (10%) |
Poorly discussion of the use case description |
Brief discussion of the use case description |
Good discussion of the use case description |
Well discussion of the use case description |
Excellent discussion of the use case description |
|
Use Case diagram (10%) |
Lack of evidence of understanding of use case diagram |
Evidence of basic understanding of use case diagram |
Evidence of good understanding of use case diagram |
Clear understanding of use case diagram |
Has excellent understanding of use case diagram |
|
Entities, Attributes and ER diagram (10%) |
Poor identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram |
Brief identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram |
Generally good identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram |
Clear description identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram |
Excellent identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram |
|
Class Diagram (10%) |
Lack of evidence of understanding of Class Diagram |
Evidence of basic understanding of Class Diagram |
Evidence of good understanding and identification of Class Diagram
|
Clear understanding and identification of Class Diagram |
Has excellent understanding and identification of Class Diagram |
|
Sequence diagram (10%) |
Poor identification and description of Sequence diagram |
Brief identification and description of Sequence diagram |
Generally good identification and description of Sequence diagram |
Clear description identification and description of Sequence diagram |
Excellent identification and description of Sequence diagram |
|
Activity diagram (10%) |
Poor identification and description of activity diagram |
Brief identification and description of activity diagram |
Generally good identification and description of activity diagram |
clear description identification and description of activity diagram |
Excellent identification and description of activity diagram |
|
Design a data entry screen (5%) |
Poor design of data entry screen |
Brief design of data entry screen |
Good design of data entry screen |
Well design of data entry screen |
Excellent design of data entry screen |
|
Design a booking taxi input screen (10%) |
Poor design of booking taxi input screen |
Brief design of booking taxi input screen |
Good design of booking taxi input screen |
Well design of booking taxi input screen |
Excellent design of booking taxi input screen |
|
Testing and deployment activities (10%) |
Poor description of testing and deployment activities |
Brief identification and description of testing and deployment activities |
Generally good identification and description of testing and deployment activities |
Clear description identification and description of testing and deployment activities |
Excellent identification and description of testing and deployment activities |
|
Summary (5%) |
Summary not relating to the report |
Brief summary of the report with some relevance |
Generally good summary of the report |
A section clearly summarizing the overall contribution |
A section very clearly summarizing the overall contribution |
|
References using Harvard style (5%) |
Lacks consistency with many errors. |
Unclear referencing/style |
Generally good referencing/style |
Clear referencing/ style |
Clear styles with excellent source of references. |