case study

profileAnEsh
assignmentbrief2021.docx

Assessment 2: Case Study-2

Due date:

Week 12

Group/individual:

Individual

Word count / Time provided:

2500

Weighting:

30%

Unit Learning Outcomes:

ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4

Assessment Details:

The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, system development approaches, data modelling, IS project management, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance.

This assessment allows students to apply theoretical concepts to practice by analyzing case studies and proposing a suitable design. The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, system development approaches, data Modeling, IS project management, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance.

Case Study: Online System for Kangaroo Taxi

Kangaroo Taxi is a new company in Australia, offering online booking services for their users. Kangaroo Taxi is about to launch an easy-to-use website allowing its users to access from smartphones. The website will enable the users to plan and book their trip. Upon the first use, users would be able to enter their details into the system, including their means of payments (e.g., credit card, PayPal, etc.). This will allow the users to use the Kangaroo Taxi in any subsequent bookings as well. Users can simply log in to their registered accounts and make a booking for a taxi by entering their pickup and destination address. The system will provide them with an estimated cost according to this information.

Suppose you are asked to develop this online system for Kangaroo Taxi. You have been given only three weeks to come up with a blueprint of the system design. After that, you will be presenting your design to a team of consultants. The online system should perform several activities such as adding or creating a new user, checking for available taxis and drivers in the area requested by the customer, calculating the cost of a trip, issuing an online ticket or receipt and processing all bookings transactions. In addition, you may add any other functions for this system.

Tasks:

1. Draw use case description for registering accounts and making a booking.

1. Draw use case diagram.

1. Identify all entities and their attribute and draw an E-R (Entity-Relationship) diagram.

1. Draw the class diagram.

1. Draw a Sequence diagram.

1. Draw activity diagram.

1. Design a data entry screen for entering membership details.

1. Design a booking taxi input screen that includes the date, time, pickup and destination address, type of the service, passenger name, contact number and payment methods. Plan suitable testing and deployment activities.

if you believe that you need to make additional assumptions, clearly state them for each situation *You can use Microsoft Visio or Microsoft Word to present your design.

Assignment Format

Submission:

Only through Canvas

Length:

2500 words max (+ or – 10%)

Font size:

12pt (min) Times Roman

Line spacing:

1.5 or double line spacing

Cover sheet:

APIC standard coversheet

Referencing:

Use Harvard referencing only

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark.

Marking

Criteria

Not satisfactory

(0-49%) of the

criterion mark)

Satisfactory

(50-64%) of the criterion mark

Good

(65-74%) of the criterion mark

Very Good

(75-84%) of the criterion mark

Excellent

(85-100%) of the criterion mark

Introduction (5%)

Poor introduction with irrelevant details

Introduction is presented briefly and is missing the report outline

Introduction is generally presented along with the report outline

Introduction is well written, and the report outline is also discussed

Introduction is very well written, and the report outline is also discussed

Use Case description

(10%)

Poorly discussion of the use case description

Brief discussion of the use case description

Good discussion of the use case description

Well discussion of the use case description

Excellent discussion of the use case description

Use Case diagram (10%)

Lack of evidence of understanding of use case diagram

Evidence of basic understanding of use case diagram

Evidence of good understanding of use case diagram

Clear understanding of use case diagram

Has excellent understanding of use case diagram

Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

(10%)

Poor identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

Brief identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

Generally good identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

Clear description identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

Excellent identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram

Class Diagram (10%)

Lack of evidence of understanding of Class

Diagram

Evidence of basic understanding of Class

Diagram

Evidence of good understanding and

identification of Class

Diagram

Clear understanding and identification of

Class Diagram

Has excellent understanding and

identification of Class

Diagram

Sequence diagram (10%)

Poor identification and description of Sequence diagram

Brief identification and description of Sequence diagram

Generally good identification and description of

Sequence diagram

Clear description identification and description of

Sequence diagram

Excellent identification and description of

Sequence diagram

Activity diagram (10%)

Poor identification and

description of activity diagram

Brief identification and description of activity diagram

Generally good identification and

description of activity diagram

clear description identification and

description of activity diagram

Excellent identification and

description of activity diagram

Design a data entry screen (5%)

Poor design of data entry screen

Brief design of data entry screen

Good design of data entry screen

Well design of data entry screen

Excellent design of data entry screen

Design a booking taxi input screen (10%)

Poor design of booking taxi input screen

Brief design of booking taxi input screen

Good design of booking taxi input screen

Well design of booking taxi input screen

Excellent design of booking taxi input screen

Testing and deployment activities

(10%)

Poor description of testing and deployment activities

Brief identification and description of testing and deployment activities

Generally good identification and

description of testing and deployment

activities

Clear description identification and

description of testing and deployment

activities

Excellent identification and

description of testing and deployment

activities

Summary

(5%)

Summary not

relating to the report

Brief summary of the report with some relevance

Generally good summary of the report

A section clearly summarizing the

overall contribution

A section very clearly summarizing the

overall contribution

References using

Harvard style (5%)

Lacks consistency with many errors.

Unclear referencing/style

Generally good referencing/style

Clear referencing/ style

Clear styles with excellent source of references.