Operations Analysis Collaberation
Supply Chain Logistics Management
BUS320
–
Supply Chai Logistics
Management
Unit
7
Assignment
How effective a collaborator are you?
Direction:
Collaboration is a critical part of business today, to the point where we even covered the topic to an extent in this week’s DB. Let’s continue the effort, but this time with a greater self-focus.
For this exercise, the second part will require you to work with a friend, co-worker, perhaps another student, anyone whom you have some type of relationship with, and preferably someone from an organization you’re involved with. Read on!
Complete the tests below, and then reflect on what your scores have shown you. How collaborative an individual are you, and where might there be room to improve? What has this exercise taught you?
Length and format:
The four (4) work sheets from below must be included with this assignment, and a paper no less than 400 words in length. This week, you have a test. No! Not like that!
These tests provide a Collaboration metric for yourself, your partner(s) as noted above, and potentially your organization. They form a natural corollary to the exploration of collaboration published elsewhere on this blog as: “How to maintain your autonomy in a collaborative partnership.”
Implicit in these tests is both a way of seeing collaboration and also a structure within which collaboration can take place. It will be quickly obvious that collaboration is not easy and that collaborations of high importance to each individual also call for the highest levels of candor and understanding.
These tests will help you answer the questions: How well do you collaborate? and: Are you able to bring out the best from yourself and draw it out from your partner(s)?
Of the two tests that follow, the first – The Personal Assessment – is predominantly for yourself, so you can appraise your personal skills at effective collaboration.
The second test – The Joint Assessment – is in four parts and enables you to score both yourself and your collaborator. It applies equally to groups as to individuals.
Reviewing both assessment tests will give you some useful feedback, and it will also add to your fund of knowledge of what is needed to ensure successful collaborations.
PLEASE NOTE: You can download the assessment forms in PDF format by right-clicking on: Dynamic Living Assessment Tests and selecting “Save target (or “link”) as”.
The Personal Assessment
This is a straightforward self-test, simply designed to highlight your strengths and weaknesses.
|
Score yourself using the following measure: 1= I have trouble with this, 2= I do this |
|
|
reasonably well, 3= I see this as a strength of mine. |
|
Once you’ve done it for yourself, you might score your partner from your perspective.
If you want to have some real fun as the nights grow longer, you might then ask him or her to do the same for you and you could discuss the results instead of watching TV one night. Of course, if you don’t think you could raise the subject with him or her, it will tell you something about the state of collaboration in your relationship.
The Joint Assessment
Each of the four assessments that follows can be completed by you (or your workgroup) for both you (Me) and your partner (Them).
Every question needs to be considered from a joint perspective because one person, or one side of the collaboration, cannot ‘do it’ for the whole partnership.
|
You can select your own scale for scoring. I find 1-5 is adequate to cover most |
|
|
nuances of opinion for me, but if you’re more precise you may prefer 1-10. |
|
The four assessments cover aspects of collaboration involved in: Trust Building, Organizing and Operational Skills, Decision-making and Creative-Planning Skills, and Conflict Management. We begin with an essential part of collaboration that has to precede any negotiation:
Trust Building
How do we let the other see that we’re reliable and consistent? It’s not enough simply to say we are. We have to show it through actions such as these. When we perform them unthinkingly, routinely, we make a strong statement as to the goodwill and earnest of our intent.
Organizing and operating skills
These are the mechanics of collaboration. We may have the best will in the world, but without some basic techniques we’re going to be creating misunderstanding and maybe setting quite the wrong impression.
Decision-Making & Creative Problem Solving
This is the fun part of collaboration, when the hard work of creating a safe and trustable working environment pays dividends.
Conflict Management
No couple or group of people can discuss any matter without coming into conflict. Oftentimes the conflict is minor, sometimes not. It’s at these times that collaboration is tested to the full. This is the time when full candor is called for, expressed in a way which, at the very least, doesn’t drive the other away.
This assessment reviews ways to respond when conflict occurs:
Students: Be sure to read the criteria (last page), by which your assignment will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.
Grading Criteria for This Week’s Assignment
|
Criteria |
Deficient |
Needs Improvement |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
|
Information Sheets Included |
No; Deduct 40 points |
Answers are one word, no explanation; Deduct 20 points |
Answers cover the questions as asked; No deduction |
|
|
Assignment Length |
Deduct 25 points |
Deduct 15 points |
Deduct 10 points |
Full credit |
|
|
Less than 100 words |
100-299 words |
300-399 words |
400 words or more |
|
Assignment Complete On-Time |
Assignment not accepted. Zero total score. |
Deduct 20 points |
Deduct 10 points |
Full Credit |
|
|
More than two days late. |
Two days late. |
One day late. |
Complete On-Time |
|
Professional communication |
0 points |
1-4 points |
5-9 points |
10 points |
|
|
More than 10 grammatical, capitalization, spelling or punctuation errors. |
5-9 grammatical, capitalization, spelling or punctuation errors. |
1-4 grammatical, capitalization, spelling or punctuation errors. |
No grammatical, capitalization, spelling or punctuation errors. |
|
References to weekly course materials |
0 points |
1 point |
2 points |
5 points |
|
|
No references made. |
1 relevant reference made. |
2 relevant references made. |
3 or more relevant references made. |
|
Content: Reflective and Critical thinking
|
0-5 points |
6-9 points |
10-14 points |
15-20 points |
|
|
Little to no reflective or critical thinking about questions/topics. Share little to no experience or insights about the topic and own experience. Limited or no weekly course concepts addressed. |
Some reflective or critical thinking about questions/topics. Share some experience or insights about organization and own experience, but may not all be relevant. Addresses limited number of concepts and/or only some aspects of course. |
Experience and insights shared are relevant and well thought out/reasoned; Addresses most relevant course concepts. |
Experience and insights shared are relevant, well-reasoned, and demonstrate depth of thinking about the concepts/topics. Addresses all relevant course concepts. |
|
Totals: |
|
|
|
/100 |