Operations Analysis Collaberation

profileBigfoot
AssignmentandRubric.docx

Supply Chain Logistics Management

BUS320

Supply Chai Logistics

Management

Unit

7

Assignment

How effective a collaborator are you?

Direction:

Collaboration is a critical part of business today, to the point where we even covered the topic to an extent in this week’s DB. Let’s continue the effort, but this time with a greater self-focus.

For this exercise, the second part will require you to work with a friend, co-worker, perhaps another student, anyone whom you have some type of relationship with, and preferably someone from an organization you’re involved with. Read on!

Complete the tests below, and then reflect on what your scores have shown you. How collaborative an individual are you, and where might there be room to improve? What has this exercise taught you?

Length and format:

The four (4) work sheets from below must be included with this assignment, and a paper no less than 400 words in length. This week, you have a test. No! Not like that!

These tests provide a Collaboration metric for yourself, your partner(s) as noted above, and potentially your organization. They form a natural corollary to the exploration of collaboration published elsewhere on this blog as: “How to maintain your autonomy in a collaborative partnership.”

Implicit in these tests is both a way of seeing collaboration and also a structure within which collaboration can take place. It will be quickly obvious that collaboration is not easy and that collaborations of high importance to each individual also call for the highest levels of candor and understanding.

These tests will help you answer the questions: How well do you collaborate? and: Are you able to bring out the best from yourself and draw it out from your partner(s)?

Of the two tests that follow, the first – The Personal Assessment – is predominantly for yourself, so you can appraise your personal skills at effective collaboration.

The second test – The Joint Assessment – is in four parts and enables you to score both yourself and your collaborator. It applies equally to groups as to individuals.

Reviewing both assessment tests will give you some useful feedback, and it will also add to your fund of knowledge of what is needed to ensure successful collaborations.

PLEASE NOTE: You can download the assessment forms in PDF format by right-clicking on: Dynamic Living Assessment Tests and selecting “Save target (or “link”) as”.

The Personal Assessment

This is a straightforward self-test, simply designed to highlight your strengths and weaknesses.

Score yourself using the following measure: 1= I have trouble with this, 2= I do this

reasonably well, 3= I see this as a strength of mine.

Once you’ve done it for yourself, you might score your partner from your perspective.

If you want to have some real fun as the nights grow longer, you might then ask him or her to do the same for you and you could discuss the results instead of watching TV one night. Of course, if you don’t think you could raise the subject with him or her, it will tell you something about the state of collaboration in your relationship.

The Joint Assessment

Each of the four assessments that follows can be completed by you (or your workgroup) for both you (Me) and your partner (Them).

Every question needs to be considered from a joint perspective because one person, or one side of the collaboration, cannot ‘do it’ for the whole partnership.

You can select your own scale for scoring. I find 1-5 is adequate to cover most

nuances of opinion for me, but if you’re more precise you may prefer 1-10.

The four assessments cover aspects of collaboration involved in: Trust Building, Organizing and Operational Skills, Decision-making and Creative-Planning Skills, and Conflict Management. We begin with an essential part of collaboration that has to precede any negotiation:

Trust Building

How do we let the other see that we’re reliable and consistent? It’s not enough simply to say we are. We have to show it through actions such as these. When we perform them unthinkingly, routinely, we make a strong statement as to the goodwill and earnest of our intent.

Organizing and operating skills

These are the mechanics of collaboration. We may have the best will in the world, but without some basic techniques we’re going to be creating misunderstanding and maybe setting quite the wrong impression.

Decision-Making & Creative Problem Solving

This is the fun part of collaboration, when the hard work of creating a safe and trustable working environment pays dividends.

Conflict Management

No couple or group of people can discuss any matter without coming into conflict. Oftentimes the conflict is minor, sometimes not. It’s at these times that collaboration is tested to the full. This is the time when full candor is called for, expressed in a way which, at the very least, doesn’t drive the other away.

This assessment reviews ways to respond when conflict occurs:

Students: Be sure to read the criteria (last page), by which your assignment will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.

Grading Criteria for This Week’s Assignment

Criteria

Deficient

Needs Improvement

Proficient

Exemplary

Information Sheets Included

No; Deduct 40 points

Answers are one word, no

explanation;

Deduct 20 points

Answers cover the questions as asked;

No deduction

Assignment Length

Deduct 25 points

Deduct 15 points

Deduct 10 points

Full credit

Less than 100 words

100-299 words

300-399 words

400 words or more

Assignment Complete On-Time

Assignment not accepted. Zero total score.

Deduct 20 points

Deduct 10 points

Full Credit

More than two days late.

Two days late.

One day late.

Complete On-Time

Professional communication

0 points

1-4 points

5-9 points

10 points

More than 10 grammatical,

capitalization, spelling or

punctuation errors.

5-9 grammatical, capitalization, spelling or

punctuation errors.

1-4 grammatical, capitalization, spelling or

punctuation errors.

No grammatical, capitalization, spelling or punctuation errors.

References to weekly course materials

0 points

1 point

2 points

5 points

No references made.

1 relevant reference made.

2 relevant references made.

3 or more relevant references made.

Content: Reflective and

Critical thinking

0-5 points

6-9 points

10-14 points

15-20 points

Little to no reflective or

critical thinking about

questions/topics.

Share little to no experience or

insights about the topic and own experience.

Limited or no weekly course concepts addressed.

Some reflective or critical thinking about

questions/topics.

Share some experience or

insights about

organization and own experience,

but may not all be relevant.

Addresses limited number of

concepts and/or

only some aspects of course.

Experience and insights shared are

relevant and well thought

out/reasoned; Addresses most relevant course concepts.

Experience and insights shared are relevant, well-reasoned, and

demonstrate depth of thinking about the

concepts/topics.

Addresses all relevant course concepts.

Totals:

/100