I need these two assignments Revamp!! NO PLAGIARISM This assignment must be based on HAC (Hospital Acquired Infections)
Cdanie69
Assignment9PP-2020.pptxstatistical results with recommendations to health system leadership.
Statistical Results for Decision Making
Chyterria Daniels
Introduction
Effective healthcare leaders influence the care of individual patients, performance of diverse clinical teams and direction of major healthcare organizations and beyond.
Importance of effective healthcare leadership is difficult to overestimate as it not only improves major clinical outcomes in patients, but also improves provider well-being by promoting workplace engagement and reducing burnout.
We define the ability to influence as the foundation of our definition of healthcare leadership: Healthcare leadership is the ability to effectively and ethically influence others for the benefit of individual patients and populations.
Introduction
We have found that leadership models are extremely helpful for learners to grasp new concepts, make sense of lessons learned through their experiences, afford structure that facilitates lasting comprehension through reflection, and provide a basis for learner assessment and program evaluation.
In the formative years of our programs, we used business leadership models as the foundation to teach leadership skills.
Our inability to find an appropriate healthcare leadership model led us to create a leadership model specific to healthcare.
Healthcare Leadership Model
graphical representation of healthcare leadership
a modified concept mapping approach to derive, prioritize, and thematically structure the fundamental competencies of healthcare leadership.
Concept mapping is a mixed methods approach that combines qualitative group processes such as brainstorming and interpretive sorting with rigorous quantitative data analysis to produce a visual depiction of the composite thinking of the group.
This process of structured conceptualization has been used to address complex issues in healthcare, and provides a framework that can guide action planning, program development or evaluation and measurement.
Results
| Characteristics | Medical students (n=22) | Physicians in training (n=29) | Attending physicians (n=25) | Non-MD professionals (n=16) | Total (n=92) |
| Sex, no. (%) | |||||
| Female | 8 (44%) | 14 (50%) | 7 (32%) | 4 (29%) | 33 (40%) |
| Male | 10 (56%) | 14 (50%) | 15 (68%) | 10 (71%) | 49 (60%) |
| Leadership training, no. (%) | |||||
| Prior formal training | 12 (57%) | 15 (54%) | 19 (83%) | 11 (73%) | 57 (66%) |
Table 1: Characteristics of participants in card sorting
Note: Discrepancies in totals are due to incomplete responses as demographic questions were optional.
RESUlts
| Competency statements, mean (±SD) | Total (n=92) |
| Acting with Personal Integrity – behaving in an open, honest, and trustworthy manner | 3.07 (±2.24) |
| Communicating Effectively – ability to communicate with patients and team; successfully navigating difficult conversations and providing feedback | 2.98 (±1.8) |
| Acting with Professional Ethical Values – applying medical ethical principles to difficult situations | 1.98 (±2.27) |
| Pursuing Excellence – striving for excellence in all areas of personal, team, and organizational life | 1.2 (±2.75) |
| Building and Maintaining Relationships – listening to and supporting others, gaining trust, and showing understanding | 1.15 (±2.17) |
| Thinking Critically – being able to think analytically and conceptually to evaluate and solve problems | 1.12 (±2.5) |
Table 2: Top competency statements ranked by mean (SD) importance score
Results
Hierarchical cluster analysis
Recommendations
Health Information authorities should collaborate to regulate, certify, and monitor health care applications and systems that integrate medical devices and health information technologies.
In collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, should establish design guidelines and standards, based on existing accessibility and usability guidelines, for content, accessibility, functionality, and usability of consumer health information technologies related to home-based health care.
Research for the labeling of and ensuing instructional materials for medical devices designed for home use by lay users.
References
Dannels SA, Yamagata H, McDade SA, et al. Evaluating a leadership program: a comparative, longitudinal study to assess the impact of the Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM) Program for Women. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):488–495.
Cochran J, Kaplan GS, Nesse RE. Physician leadership in changing times. Healthc (Amst) 2014;2(1):19–21.
Shanafelt TD, Gorringe G, Menaker R, et al. Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(4):432–440.
Ham C. Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. Lancet. 2003;361(9373):1978–1980.
Majmudar A, Jain AK, Chaudry J, Schwartz RW. High-performance teams and the physician leader: an overview. J Surg Educ. 2010;67(4):205–209.
Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989;12(1):1–16.
Calhoun JG, Vincent ET, Baker GR, Butler PW, Sinioris ME, Chen SL. Competency identification and modeling in healthcare leadership. J Health Adm Educ. 2004;21(4):419–440.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement . The Clinical Leadership Competency Framework. Coventry, England: 2011. [Accessed March 27, 2017]. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/AMRCLeadershipFramework.
Bradberry T, Greaves J. Emotional Intelligence 2.0. San Diego, CA: Talent Smart; 2009.
