SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT ATTN: CATHERINE OWENS

profile1Chance
Assignment7-Powerpoint21.pptx

Assignment 7 – Powerpoint Presentation

Team B –MGMT 617: Leading Team

September 20, 2020

HOLACRACY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HOLACRACY DEFINED / ORIGIN/ TIMELINE

ADVANTAGES / DISADVANTAGES

IMPLEMENTATION / ELEMENTS

01

02

03

SUCCESSFUL / UNSUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION

04

CONCLUSION

05

WHAT IS HOLACRACY?

A customized self-management practice

A way to empower members in making meaningful decisions

A framework which pursues the organization’s purpose

A non-traditional, self managed alignment organizational structure

A business practice that incorporates innovation to improve the ‘decision-making’ mindset (Nair, 2016)

HOLACRACY ORIGINATION

Developed to help organizations understand what gets in the way of collaborative, effective work

Designed to eliminate conventional management layer models and increase innovation and responsiveness to customer needs

Established to differentiate roles and the people working in them

Created to address tensions in the organization

Formed to enhance survivability in complex, dynamic environments

TIMELINE

Organizations begin to use holacracy for training and implementation services to transform operations – Core rule set evolved into a version 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, and 4.0

2009 - Now

Robertson and entrepreneur Thom Thomison focused experimentation and research to form holacracy

2007

HolocracyOne formalized the method into the first Holacracy Constitution

2009

Brian Robertson began experimentation and research on organizational culture, values, and consciousness – responded to current challenges of principles and practices for ‘lean’ movement

2001

ADVANTAGES OF HOLACRACY

Beyond empowerment, self-managing workplace distributing authority equally amongst all

Leader-follower conflicts are eradicated

The peer-to-peer workplace enhances efficiency, innovation, and accountability

Creates clarity of purpose and roles, thereby increasing self-worth as well as satisfaction (Kumar & Mukherjee, 2018)

DISADVANTAGES OF HOLACRACY

Implementation, and sustainability on a larger scale is questionable

The increased responsibilities and autonomy may not be what all employees want

The transition from hierarchic environment to Holacracy may disrupt the current habits, and processes in place (Yew, 2020)

Holacracy reduces control in an organization, making it difficult to devote department priorities and change course

THREE STEPS IN IMPLEMENTING HOLACRACY

QUANTITATIVE DATA MANAGEMENT

The organization consolidates information from three aspects:

Results – the end outcomes of the core of operations, such as sales and productivity

Process – the tasks performed in the organization

Labor – the time and work efforts spent in the process

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

Members communicate ‘Quantitative Data Management’ aspects throughout the organization to promote participative decision-making in areas that need improvement – achieved through an ‘open web’ of collaborative meetings

RELEASE INFORMATION AND POWER

Decisions and further discussion findings are released throughout the organization through press, internet, and memorandum formats. Self-management concepts are reinforced through this unobstructed flow of decisive information (Velinov et al., 2018)

Establish and maintain protocols

Clear formal guidance allows for efficiency and standardization

Leave no member behind

Ensures that communication is open and accessible for each person – the internalized information advances the concept of self-management

Start slow and build a consensus

This element facilitates the change management process and fosters the culture and structure in the organizational environment

Set realistic expectations and goals

Setting these expectations is necessary for recognizing accomplishment and encouraging growth during the implementation of holacracy

FOUR ELEMENTS OF HOLACRACY

David Allen Company – Raleigh, NC

One of the nation’s most respected tile, stone, terrazzo, underlayment and specialty concrete contractors

Successfully implemented self-customized management practices of holacracy – to include leveraging technology to support production and adapting to meet consumer demands

Holacracy practice contributed to steady increases in annual revenue: $61.1 million in 2019 (Pressler, 2019)

Zappos – Las Vegas, NV

American Multinational online shoe and clothing retailer

Successfully implemented self-customized management practices of holacracy – to include controlling production and engaging in self-efficacy

Holacracy practice contributed to increased employee retention rates and 2019 revenue of $1.2 billion (Luenendonk, 2019)

SUCCESSFUL ORGANIZATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION

UNSUCCESSFUL ORGANIZATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION

ExtraHop

Cake Human Resources

The Human Resource software corporation failed to fully implement self-customized management and reverted back to the traditional structure

The cybersecurity solutions organization failed due to the inability to adapt to self-customized practices

Holacracy is a contemporary approach to modern business practice. As with any construct, it’s effectiveness is largely influenced by organizational commitment. The holacracy outlook distributes power differently from conventional management hierarchies and allows for the maintaining of individual freedom and alignment with an organization’s mission – making the process one of the most progressive, alternative organizational structures.

CONCLUSION

“If everyone had to think outside the box, maybe it was the box that needed fixing.”

Kumar, V. S., & Mukherjee, S. (2018). Holacracy – the future of organizing? the case of zappos. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(7), 12-15. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1108/HRMID-08-2018-0161

Luenendonk, M. (2019, September 18). Zappos: E-Commerce Retailer. Cleverism. https://www.cleverism.com/zappos-ecommerce-retailer/

Nair, D. R. (2016). Holacracy in academia. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 13(1), 4. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/docview/1780449824?accountid=8289

Pressler, A. (2019, October 1). Business North Carolina’s Top 125 Private Companies 2019. Business North Carolina. https://businessnc.com/business-north-carolinas-top-125-private-companies-2019/

Velinov, E., Vassilev, V., & Denisov, I. (2018). Holacracy and obliquity: Contingency management approaches in organizing companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 330-335. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.21511 /ppm.16(1).2018.32

Yew, S. Y. (2020). Holacracy in action: Zappos experience replicability [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Università Ca'Foscari Venezia.

REFERENCES