Assignment 6

assignment6rubric.docx

Home >Education homework help >Assignment 6

Your response must demonstrate an understanding of the knowledge of the field. You are expected to demonstrate the depth of your understanding by applying your knowledge rather than by merely reciting factual information.

Your response will be evaluated based on the following criteria.

· o Purpose: the extent to which your response achieves the purpose of the assignment.

· o Subject Knowledge: the appropriateness and accuracy in the application of the subject knowledge

· o Support: quality and relevance of supporting evidence

· o Rationale: soundness of argument and degree of understanding of the subject

Descriptions of each criteria.

Purpose

· o Your response focuses on reading comprehension and explains both strengths and weaknesses.

· o You cite specific evidence from both the passage and the retelling of the passage.

Subject Knowledge

· o The application of subject knowledge is accurate and substantial, including the use of terminology.

· o The distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is clearly stated.

· o Areas where the student needs intervention are clearly identified and addressed.

Support

· o You provide examples from the text and/or retelling that are both relevant and important to the discussion.

· o Support is sound and the examples are of high quality.

· o The examples and the discussion of the examples are clearly related and in context.

Rationale

· o Your response is ably reasoned and relates each part of the discussion to the whole picture of the student’s comprehension.

· o The choice of strength/weakness to discuss, the explanations given and the examples all show a comprehensive understanding of reading comprehension.

· o The conclusions brings the threads of the discussion together.

Analysis of Reading Comprehension – Grading RubricCriterion

Advanced – 4

Proficient – 3

Basic – 2

Minimal – 1

Purpose

InTASC 4

Your response focuses on significant reading and comprehension skills.

A significant strength and weakness are identified and supported thoroughly with specific evidence from both the passage and the retelling of the passage (32 pts)

Your response focuses on reading and comprehension skills.

A strength and weakness are identified and supported with specific evidence from both the passage and the retelling of the passage (27.2 pts)

Your response focuses on reading OR comprehension skills.

A strength and weakness are identified and supported with specific evidence from the passage OR the retelling of the passage

(22.4 pts)

Your response is vaguely focused on reading comprehension.

A strength and weakness are identified but supported with little or no specific evidence (17.6 pts)

Subject Knowledge

InTASC 4

The application of subject knowledge is accurate and substantial, including the use of terminology.

The distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is clearly stated.

Areas where the student needs intervention are clearly identified and addressed (32 pts)

The application of subject knowledge is accurate, including the use of terminology.

The distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is apparent.

Areas where the student needs intervention are identified and addressed. (27.2 pts)

The application of subject knowledge is mostly accurate, including the use of terminology.

Some distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is made.

Areas where the student needs intervention are identified. (22.4 pts)

The application of subject knowledge is minimal or inaccurate, and terminology is lacking.

Little to no distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is made.

Areas where the student needs intervention are ignored. (17.6 pts)

Support

InTASC 4

Examples from the text and retelling are both relevant and important to the discussion.

Support is sound and the examples are of high quality.

The examples and the discussion of the examples are clearly related and in context. (32 pts)

Examples from the text and/or retelling are both relevant and important to the discussion.

Support is sound and the examples are of high quality.

The examples and the discussion of the examples are clearly related.

(27.2 pts)

Examples from the text or retelling are relevant to the discussion.

Support and examples are present.

There is discussion of the examples. (22.4 pts)

Examples from the text or retelling are minimal or missing.

Little to no support or examples are present.

There is little to no discussion of the examples. (17.6 pts)

Rationale

InTASC 4

CAEP A1.1 Data Analysis

The response is ably reasoned and relates each part of the discussion to the whole picture of the student’s comprehension.

The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a comprehensive understanding of reading comprehension.

The conclusion brings the threads of the discussion together. (32 pts)

The response relates each part of the discussion to the whole picture of the student’s comprehension.

The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a good understanding of reading comprehension.

The conclusion neatly summarizes the discussion. (27.2 pts)

The response focuses on the student’s comprehension.

The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a basic understanding of reading comprehension.

The conclusion restates the main points. (22.4 pts)

The response minimally focuses on the student’s comprehension.

The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show little to no understanding of reading comprehension.

The conclusion is minimal or lacking. (17.6 pts)

APA-compliant formatting

Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (NO errors) (10 pts)

Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (1-2 MINOR errors).

(8.5 pts)

Limited (3-5) APA errors in APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (7 pts)

More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.(5.5 pts)

Mechanics

The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS. (12 pts)

The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors). (10.2 pts)

The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors). (8.4 pts)

The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5

errors). (6.6 pts)