QUALITY PAPER!!!!!! DUE 7 JUNE BY 10PM EST
1. Explain what you will do during the implementation event to tilt the balance away from the presentation toward participation.
2. Include a synopsis of how people might react to the idea that change is imminent and that they will be involved in the change process.
3. Explain what you will do to help people get unstuck from the same old conversations and begin new ones.
4. Explain how you will bring the element of place into your design for each event.
The requirements and format of the paper is to be as follows:
· ZERO PLAGERISM!!!!!!!!!!!
· IN-TEXT CITATIONS MUST BE LEGIT AND ABLE TO BE FOUND!!!
· Must be 4-5 Pages
· Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
· MUST include an introduction, body with headers (1-4 listed above), and conclusion
· Include a reference page. The reference page is not included in the required page length. Must include 3-4 references
· Reference #1 Class textbook: Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer-Wiley
|
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric: |
|
Outcomes Assessed |
· Examine organizational and employee resistance as part of the consulting process. · Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource management consulting. |
|
Grading Rubric for Assignment 3 – Employee Resistance |
|
Criteria |
0 Unacceptable |
20 Developing |
30 Competent |
40 Exemplary |
|
1. Discuss the factors involved in the outsourcing decision. |
Did not complete the assignment or did not discuss the factors involved in the outsourcing decision; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Discussed partially the factors involved in the outsourcing decision; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Discussed sufficiently the factors involved in the outsourcing decision. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Discussed fully the factors involved in the outsourcing decision. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
2. Describe the issues surrounding the sense of control. |
Did not complete the assignment or did not describe the issues surrounding the sense of control; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Described partially the issues surrounding the sense of control; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Described sufficiently the issues surrounding the sense of control. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Described fully the issues surrounding the sense of control. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
3. Prioritize the steps involved in meeting employee resistance to the outsourcing plan and rationalize the plan. . |
Did not complete the assignment or did not prioritize and rationalize the steps involved in meeting employee resistance to the outsourcing plan; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Prioritized and rationalized partially the steps involved in meeting employee resistance to the outsourcing plan; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Prioritized and rationalized sufficiently the steps involved in the meeting employee resistance to the outsourcing plan. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Prioritized and rationalized fully the steps involved meeting employee resistance to the outsourcing plan. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
4. Justify why the employees’ jobs should be protected. |
Did not justify why the employees’ jobs should be protected; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Partially justified why the employees’ jobs should be protected; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Sufficiently justified why the employees’ jobs should be protected. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Fully justified why the employees’ jobs should be protected. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
|
5. Clarity |
Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized. (Major issues) |
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (Many issues) |
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues) |
Explanations very clear and well organized. (Added helpful details) |
|
6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, and APA usage. Included 2 references. |
Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues) |
Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues) |
Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues) |
Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. |