Nursing assignment
godrick
Assignment5.docxChronic Care Management Plan
People living with a chemical or behavioral addiction often struggle with daily living functions, employment, family, and social relationships. Applying a chronic care management plan can be useful to help a patient manage their chronic disease. Utilize the case below and outline a chronic care management plan for this patient.
Instructions:
1. Review this case scenario
.
2. Use this template Assignment 5.1 Chronic Care Management Plan
to create your chronic care management plan.
3. Be sure to thoroughly address each area (review the grading rubric for more information). You will be graded based on the thoroughness of your responses and the integration of course materials.
4. Support your response with evidence and/or examples from the course materials and/or find additional resources from the UTA Library.
5. Cite any resources using APA format Links to an external site. .
Expectations:
Please submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (CT) on Friday of Module 5. Submit as a Word document or PDF file only in the format provided.
Grading:
A rubric is provided to explain the criteria for points and how you are graded.
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Assessments view longer description |
20 to >17 pts Exceptional Identifies 3-4 key assessments relevant to medical diagnoses. Identifies 3 psychosocial concerns. 17 to >13 pts Proficient Identified 1-2 key assessments relevant to medical diagnoses. Identifies 2 psychosocial concerns. 13 to >0 pts Unacceptable Identifies assessments not relevant to medical diagnoses. Identifies 0-1 psychosocial concern. |
/ 20 pts |
|
Diagnoses view longer description |
10 to >8 pts Exceptional Identifies accurate diagnoses specific to patients history and symptoms. 8 to >6 pts Proficient Identifies somewhat accurate diagnoses specific to patients history and symptoms. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable Identifies no or inaccurate diagnoses specific to patients history and symptoms. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Interventions & Rationale view longer description |
25 to >22 pts Exceptional Identifies 3 independent interventions. Scientific rationale relevant and supported by citations. 22 to >17 pts Proficient Identifies 2 independent interventions. Scientific rationale somewhat relevant and supported by citations. 17 to >0 pts Unacceptable Identifies 1 independent interventions. Scientific rationale not relevant or supported by citations. |
/ 25 pts |
|
Expected Outcomes view longer description |
10 to >8 pts Exceptional Describes relevant outcomes specific to identified interventions. 8 to >6 pts Proficient Describes somewhat relevant outcomes specific to identified interventions. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable Describes irrelevant outcomes specific to identified interventions. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Referrals view longer description |
15 to >13 pts Exceptional Lists 3 or more appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. Demonstrates excellent understanding of interventions. 13 to >10 pts Proficient Lists 2 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns. Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of interventions. 10 to >0 pts Unacceptable Lists inappropriate collaborative issues/concerns. Demonstrates unsatisfactory understanding of interventions. |
/ 15 pts |
|
Evaluation/Monitoring Plan view longer description |
20 to >17 pts Exceptional Follow-up plan is specific and detailed related to interventions and referrals. 17 to >13 pts Proficient Follow-up plan is somewhat specific and detailed related to interventions and referrals. 13 to >0 pts Unacceptable Follow-up plan is not specific or detailed related to interventions and referrals. |
/ 20 pts |
|
|
