Social Science Assignment 4 and 5
|
Assignment IV (2-3 pages) - Proposes a theoretically or model-based solution for change within the context of factors or pressures that support the status quo (restraining forces) and those pressures that support change in the desired direction (driving forces). ( See Appendix D and E)
|
|
|
Introduction - Solution & Vision for Change |
10 |
|
Describe key elements of proposed change based on literature review |
|
|
Discuss macro – the theoretical/model basis of the proposed change (based on the literature review) |
20 |
|
History of theory/model development |
4 |
|
Key proponents of theory/model |
4 |
|
Seminal message/ focus of theory/model |
4 |
|
Clear and thorough connection between the theory/model base and the proposed change |
4 |
|
Vision statement (Essential elements after the change – what will the difference look like?) |
4 |
|
Introduction - Systems, Roles, and Allies or Adversaries Analysis Chart - Presented in narrative format. Diagram placed in appendix |
10 |
|
Identify individuals and their organizational roles and if they are sponsor, agent, target and if they are allies or adversaries |
|
|
Introduction - ID Force Field Analysis Chart - Presented in narrative format. Diagram placed in appendix |
30 |
|
Identify Internal Driving Force |
5 |
|
Identify Environmental Driving Force |
5 |
|
Identify Internal Restraining Force |
5 |
|
Identify Environmental Restraining Force |
5 |
|
Identify Benefits to target and if allies or adversaries |
5 |
|
Identify losses to target and if allies or adversaries |
5 |
|
Composition |
20 |
|
Details –Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information. |
5 |
|
Organization - The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong. |
5 |
|
Word Choice - The author uses vivid words and phrases. The choice and placement of words seems accurate, natural, and not forced. |
5 |
|
Sentence Structure, Grammar, Mechanics, & Spelling -All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics. |
5 |
|
|
|
Appendix D: Systems, Roles, and Allies or Adversaries Analysts Chart
|
Stakeholder, Roles, Allies and Adversaries |
Whose support is needed |
Readiness |
Capacity |
||||||
|
Stakeholder |
Role |
Ally |
Adversary |
Must actively champion |
Has little influence |
Is ready to champion |
Adamantly opposes |
Going along with the majority |
Has the skills and argument to be a champion |
|
Brenda |
Administrative Assistant |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
|
Yes |
|
Niesha |
Assist. Director |
|
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Benefits and Losses Chart
|
Negative Outcomes of Not Making the Change |
Benefits/Positive Outcomes of Making the Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Appendix E: Force Field Analysis Chart
|
Impact Score |
|
Forces for change |
|
Recommended Change |
|
Forces Against Change |
|
Impact Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Impact Score
3 High Impact
2 Medium Impact
1 Low Impact
0 No Impact