Assignment 4

profiledgrhmnfclanton
Assignment4GradingRubric.pdf

5/7/2018 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/HRM/565/1154/Week 8/Week 8 Assignment 4 Grading Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/HRM/565/1154/Week%208/Week%208%20Assignment%204%20Grading%20Rubric.html 1/1

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 165 Assignment 4: Employee Programs

Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

1. Describe briefly the three (3) companies’ coaching, performance management, and employee wellness programs. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely described briefly the three (3) companies’ coaching, performance management, and employee wellness programs.

Partially described briefly the three (3) companies’ coaching, performance management, and employee wellness programs.

Satisfactorily described briefly the three (3) companies’ coaching, performance management, and employee wellness programs.

Thoroughly described briefly the three (3) companies’ coaching, performance management, and employee wellness programs.

2. Compare the three (3) companies’ programs within a table format.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely compared the three (3) companies’ programs within a table format.

Partially compared the three (3) companies’ programs within a table format.

Satisfactorily compared the three (3) companies’ programs within a table format.

Thoroughly compared the three (3) companies’ programs within a table format.

3. Explain how these types of programs may enhance employee retention and productivity. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely explained how these types of programs may enhance employee retention and productivity.

Partially explained how these types of programs may enhance employee retention and productivity.

Satisfactorily explained how these types of programs may enhance employee retention and productivity.

Thoroughly explained how these types of programs may enhance employee retention and productivity.

4. Recommend additions or modifications to the organizations, if necessary. Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended additions or modifications to the organizations, if necessary.

Partially recommended additions or modifications to the organizations, if necessary.

Satisfactorily recommended additions or modifications to the organizations, if necessary.

Thoroughly recommended additions or modifications to the organizations, if necessary.

5. 4 references Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present