Collaboration

Assignment 3 Rubric

Assignment 3: Reaching a Common Goal Through Collaboration

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement

Satisfactory Competent Exemplary

COM200-A3-1 1. Provide clear and comprehensive documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.

0.00 %

Does not provide documentation of the common measurable goal completed.

65.00 %

Provides incomplete or unclear documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.

75.00 %

Provides partial documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.

85.00 %

Provides documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.

100.00 %

Provides clear and comprehensive documentation of the common measurable goal the team has completed.

COM200-A3-2 2. Describe team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities and how these were established.

0.00 %

Does not describe team process.

65.00 %

Describes team process in general terms without providing specifics.

75.00 %

Describes team process, but does not include each person’s role and responsibilities.

85.00 %

Describes team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities

100.00 %

Fully describes team process, including each person’s role and responsibilities and how these were established.

COM200-A3-3 3. Identify collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explain how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal, with specific examples.

0.00 %

Does not identify any collaborative tools.

65.00 %

Identifies collaborative tools used (or potential tools that could be used).

75.00 %

Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools that could be used and partially explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal.

85.00 %

Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal.

100.00 %

Identifies collaborative tools (or potential tools used and explains how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal. Includes specific examples.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 10.00%

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

1 of 2

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement

Satisfactory Competent Exemplary

COM200-A3-4 4. Describe 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal, including concrete examples.

0.00 %

Does not describe collaborative approaches or describes ineffective approaches used.

65.00 %

Describes collaborative approaches used, but does not describe how they were used to accomplish the team’s goal.

75.00 %

Describes 1–2 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal.

85.00 %

Describes 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal. Provides concrete examples of only one of these approaches.

100.00 %

Describes 2–3 effective collaborative approaches and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal. Provides concrete examples of these approaches.

COM200-A3-5 5. Describe challenges and opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork, including specific examples.

0.00 %

Does not describe challenges or opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork.

65.00 %

Describes challenges or opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork.

75.00 %

Describes challenges and opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork.

85.00 %

Describes challenges and opportunities to improve collaborative teamwork. Provides specific examples of either challenges or opportunities.

100.00 %

Describes challenges and opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork. Provides specific examples of each.

6. The submission was clean, clear, and easy to read.

0.00 %

Did not submit an assignment.

65.00 %

Submission had major spelling/grammar issues in 50% of the assignment.

75.00 %

Submission had major spelling/grammar issues in 25% of the submission.

85.00 %

Submission had no major spelling/grammar issues, but minor issues throughout the assignment.

100.00 %

Submission was clean, clear, and easy to read.

Weight 25.00%

Weight 20.00%

Weight 5.00%

2 of 2